Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44412

Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2016, 05:52
Question Stats:
79% (01:23) correct 21% (01:27) wrong based on 141 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2016
Posts: 263
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23 GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.9

Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2016, 06:43
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Bunuel wrote: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the beginning of 2016, her portfolio had an allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Over the course of 2016, the total value of her portfolio increased by 8%, with the value of her stock holdings increasing by 10%. By what percent did the value of her bond holdings increase?
A. 4% B. 5% C. 6% D. 7% E. 7.5% B Let the total value of her portfolio be $100,000 then the value of her stocks will be $60,000 and the value of her bonds will be $40,000 Her total portfolio value increased by 8% to $108,000 her stock holding value increased by 10% to $66,000 so her bond increased to $108,000$66,000= $42000 required = $42,000$40,000/$40,000 = 1/20 = 5%



Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3366
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)

Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2016, 08:14
Bunuel wrote: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the beginning of 2016, her portfolio had an allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Over the course of 2016, the total value of her portfolio increased by 8%, with the value of her stock holdings increasing by 10%. By what percent did the value of her bond holdings increase?
A. 4% B. 5% C. 6% D. 7% E. 7.5% As usual a tabular approach works best for me  Attachment:
Capture.PNG [ 5.25 KiB  Viewed 1375 times ]
Thus total value of Bond at the end of 2016 is 420 ( ie, 1080  660 ) So, Per unit value of Bond at the end of 2016 is \(\frac{420}{40} = 10.50\) Hence, percentage increase is \(\frac{0.50}{10}*100 =5\)%, answer will be (B)
_________________
Thanks and Regards
Abhishek....
PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS
How to use Search Function in GMAT Club  Rules for Posting in QA forum  Writing Mathematical Formulas Rules for Posting in VA forum  Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )



Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1283
Location: Malaysia

Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2017, 22:08
Bunuel wrote: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the beginning of 2016, her portfolio had an allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Over the course of 2016, the total value of her portfolio increased by 8%, with the value of her stock holdings increasing by 10%. By what percent did the value of her bond holdings increase?
A. 4% B. 5% C. 6% D. 7% E. 7.5% Official solution from Veritas Prep. If you recognize that this is a weighted average problem, you can employ the weighted average Mapping Strategy to solve. You know that the weighted average of growth is 8% and that the growth from stocks is 10%, so you can draw your map accordingly: x8%10% You also know that the ratio of stocks to bonds is 3:2, meaning that the distances from x% to 8% and from 8% to 10% will follow a ratio of 3:2, with the more heavilyweighted stocks (10%) having the shorter distance. So since there are two places from 8 to 10 that means that x will be three places from 8, meaning that the answer is 5%, answer choice B. Alternatively, you can solve algebraically or by picking numbers. Since you're working with percent changes, if you want to pick numbers a good place to start is to pick a number like $1,000 for her total value. That would mean that she started with $600 in stocks, from which a 10% increase would mean that stocks gained her $60. Since her total value increased from $1000 to $1080, that means that bonds needed to account for the other 20% gain. Given a starting value of $400 in bonds, you can then ask what percent of $400 is $20, and the answer is 5%.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."
“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”
"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."
Rules for posting in verbal forum  Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!



Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 38

Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2017, 11:35
Stupid question. Trying to solve this with weighted average formula, but for some reason it doesn't work. (x is bond return) \(\frac{0.6*10+0.4*x}{10+x}\)= 8 6+0.4x=80+8x 7.6x= 74



VP
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 1437

Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2017, 12:45
1
This post received KUDOS
Bunuel wrote: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the beginning of 2016, her portfolio had an allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Over the course of 2016, the total value of her portfolio increased by 8%, with the value of her stock holdings increasing by 10%. By what percent did the value of her bond holdings increase?
A. 4% B. 5% C. 6% D. 7% E. 7.5% inter , I ran into exactly the same problem. I don't use the scale method or alligation. I stayed with weighted average, but I used different numbers and got the answer. I kept everything in decimals because x is a percent; x is really \(\frac{x}{100}\). This weighted average works, where x = percent return on bonds: (.6)(.1) + (.4)(x) = .08 .06 + .4x = .08 .4x = .02 x = \(\frac{.02}{.4}\) x = .05 = 5 percent ANSWER B
_________________
At the still point, there the dance is.  T.S. Eliot Formerly genxer123



Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 38

Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2017, 13:09
Thanks  just realized everything is already in percents.



VP
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 1437

Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2017, 13:51
inter wrote: Thanks  just realized everything is already in percents. inter  this question is really basic, but now I'm a little scrambled : when you say "everything is already in percents," what, in weighted average terms, do you mean? I usually work with rounder numbers (I change decimal percentages to integers). I went wrong by multiplying the weights, instead of the percentages, by 100 to get rounder numbers. I also know that I could multiply the percentages by 100 and it works (result is .4x = 2, x = 5, and I've included the "percent" already by multiplying all the percents by 100). For the future: if "everything is already in percents," do you find that it is easier to just leave them that way? Or did you intend something else?
_________________
At the still point, there the dance is.  T.S. Eliot Formerly genxer123



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 2155

Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Dec 2017, 08:21
Bunuel wrote: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the beginning of 2016, her portfolio had an allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Over the course of 2016, the total value of her portfolio increased by 8%, with the value of her stock holdings increasing by 10%. By what percent did the value of her bond holdings increase?
A. 4% B. 5% C. 6% D. 7% E. 7.5% We can let p = the value of Amy’s portfolio at the beginning of 2016. We are given that she initially had 60% stocks or 0.6p and 40% bonds or 0.4p. Since the total value of her stock holdings increased by 10% and the total value of her portfolio increased by 8%, we can create the following equation in which n is the percentage increase of the bond holdings. 1.1(0.6p) + (1 + n/100)(0.4p) = 1.08p 0.66p + [(100 + n)/100)](0.4p) = 1.08p 0.66p + [(40p + 0.4pn)/100] = 1.08p Multiplying the entire equation by 100, we have: 66p + 40p + 0.4pn = 108p 106p + 0.4pn = 108p 0.4pn = 2p 0.4n = 2 n = 2/0.4 = 5 Answer: B
_________________
Jeffery Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
GMAT Quant SelfStudy Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 11309
Location: United States (CA)
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170

Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jan 2018, 14:10
Hi All, This question can be solved in a number of different ways, including algebraically and by TESTing VALUES. It's ultimately a Weighted Average question though, so here's how you can approach it with that formula: Since we have 60% stocks and 40% bonds, the ratio is 6/4 = 3/2... meaning that for every 3 stocks we have 2 bonds. We know that the value of the stocks increased by 10% and the TOTAL value of the portfolio increased by 8%. We're asked to find the increase in the value of the bonds.... X = increase in value of the bonds [3(10) + 2(X)] / (5) = 8 30 + 2X = 40 2X = 10 X = 5 Thus, the value of the bonds increased by 5% Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/
***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************




Re: Amy’s retirement portfolio contains only stocks and bonds. At the begi
[#permalink]
12 Jan 2018, 14:10






