sivasanjeev wrote:
Children's tendency to be more susceptible to bronchitis and asthma than adults is possibly because, according to recent research, children retain 35 percent more of inhaled airborne particles on the surface of their lungs than adults do.
(A) Children's tendency to be more susceptible to bronchitis and asthma than adults is
(B) Children's tendency to be more susceptible than is the case with adults to bronchitis and asthma is
(C) Children tend toward being more susceptible to bronchitis and asthma than adults, which is
(D) Children, who tend to be more susceptible to bronchitis and asthma than are adults, are so
(E) Children tend to be more susceptible than adults to bronchitis and asthma,
comparison on gmat is never easy. it makes us trouble.
the point is the comparison must be between the logic things. we need a logic comparison. one way to find logic comparison is parallelism. parallelism helps us find the compared elements and check whether compared elements are logically compared.
but we do not need perfect parallelism to make comparison logic. some official answer on
og or gmatprep contain no perfect comparison but as long as the elements compared are logic , the sentence is fine.
so, the main point is that using parallelism to find the 2 elements compared. the main point is not that we find a parallelism. our purpose is to find the element compared grammatically and check weather they are logically compared logically.
using parallelism to find grammatical role of each compared element. each compared element must have the same grammatical role in its clause. if grammatical roles are different , we find a mistake.
look at choice A.
look for parallelism and grammatical roles of "children's " and "adult". they are not parallel and grammatical role of "adult" and "children's" are different. we find a mistake
children's tendency should be compared with adults's tendency, not adults
choice A is gone.
choice B should be " as is the case with adults' tendency"