Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
lalliemoon
Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 37
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Schools: Darden '27 IIMB '25 IIMC '25 IIM IIMC HEC Jan'24 Intake ISB '27 Anderson '27 Booth '27 Columbia '27 Fuqua '27 Kelley '27 Kenan-Flagler '27 Rotman '27
GRE 1: Q168 V159
GPA: ???-
Schools: Darden '27 IIMB '25 IIMC '25 IIM IIMC HEC Jan'24 Intake ISB '27 Anderson '27 Booth '27 Columbia '27 Fuqua '27 Kelley '27 Kenan-Flagler '27 Rotman '27
GRE 1: Q168 V159
Posts: 37
18 Jul 2024, 01:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
A) The first is the analyst's main conclusion; the second provides evidence to support that conclusion.
- This option suggests that the first boldface statement is the main conclusion, which isn't accurate because it's more of a premise or observation. The second statement does provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of current marketing strategies, but it's not the main conclusion.
- The first statement presents an observation (no increase in budget despite competitors' increased spending). The second statement provides an explanation (existing strategies are effective), but it's more than just an additional explanation; it supports the overall conclusion.
- The analyst doesn't dispute the first statement; it's accepted as a fact. The second statement provides evidence rather than an alternative explanation.
- This option correctly captures the situation. The first statement presents a scenario (competitors increasing advertising, but no increase in our budget or loss of market share), which is unexpected. The second statement provides evidence (increased customer engagement and satisfaction, stable market share despite cost increases) that supports the conclusion that the existing strategies are effective.
- The first observation is not under question; it's accepted as true. The second statement provides supporting evidence rather than refuting an objection.
18 Jul 2024, 01:02
Kudos
Bookmarks
Let's analyze the analyst's reasoning and the roles of the boldfaced portions:
The first boldfaced portion is:
"Despite the recent spike in online advertising by most competitors, our company has not increased its digital marketing budget and has seen no decrease in market share."
This portion presents a scenario that seems contradictory to what might be expected: typically, one might expect that not increasing the marketing budget in response to competitors' increased advertising would lead to a decrease in market share. However, this has not happened.
The second boldfaced portion is:
"Furthermore, our sales team has reported an increase in customer engagement and satisfaction with current marketing efforts."
This portion provides additional evidence supporting the conclusion that the company's existing marketing strategies are still effective despite the lack of increased digital marketing spending.
Given this analysis, the best answer is:
(D) The first presents a scenario that seems contradictory to expected outcomes; the second provides supporting evidence that explains the actual outcome observed.
The first boldfaced portion is:
"Despite the recent spike in online advertising by most competitors, our company has not increased its digital marketing budget and has seen no decrease in market share."
This portion presents a scenario that seems contradictory to what might be expected: typically, one might expect that not increasing the marketing budget in response to competitors' increased advertising would lead to a decrease in market share. However, this has not happened.
The second boldfaced portion is:
"Furthermore, our sales team has reported an increase in customer engagement and satisfaction with current marketing efforts."
This portion provides additional evidence supporting the conclusion that the company's existing marketing strategies are still effective despite the lack of increased digital marketing spending.
Given this analysis, the best answer is:
(D) The first presents a scenario that seems contradictory to expected outcomes; the second provides supporting evidence that explains the actual outcome observed.
18 Jul 2024, 01:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
(A) The first is the analyst's main conclusion; the second provides evidence to support that conclusion. - The first is not the main conclusion. The conclusion is affirmation of effective marketing strategy by the analysts.
(B) The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation; the second is the analyst's additional explanation. - The first is not rejecting any explanation. It is an observation.
(C) The first is a statement of fact that the analyst disputes; the second provides an alternative explanation that the analyst offers. - The first is not a statement of fact, rather it's an observation by the analysts.
(D) The first presents a scenario that seems contradictory to expected outcomes; the second provides supporting evidence that explains the actual outcome observed. - With no increase in marketing budget the market share should have decreased. The first bold-face contradicts this expected outcome. The second provides evidence with supporting this with customer engagement data.
(E) The first outlines an initial observation that is under question; the second provides evidence to refute a potential objection to the analyst's final conclusion. - The first option is not under question and the second is not an objection to the conclusion.
Correct Option: D
Posted from my mobile device
(B) The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation; the second is the analyst's additional explanation. - The first is not rejecting any explanation. It is an observation.
(C) The first is a statement of fact that the analyst disputes; the second provides an alternative explanation that the analyst offers. - The first is not a statement of fact, rather it's an observation by the analysts.
(D) The first presents a scenario that seems contradictory to expected outcomes; the second provides supporting evidence that explains the actual outcome observed. - With no increase in marketing budget the market share should have decreased. The first bold-face contradicts this expected outcome. The second provides evidence with supporting this with customer engagement data.
(E) The first outlines an initial observation that is under question; the second provides evidence to refute a potential objection to the analyst's final conclusion. - The first option is not under question and the second is not an objection to the conclusion.
Correct Option: D
Posted from my mobile device
