It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 21:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2016
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 16 [3], given: 30

In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2016, 23:25
3
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (01:43) correct 50% (01:19) wrong based on 291 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.

B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.

C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.

D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.

E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 16 [3], given: 30

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Posts: 593

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 45

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2016, 01:50
mkjabc wrote:
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.

B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.

C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.

D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.

E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.


Premise 1: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession.

Premise 2: Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally

Assumption : That all subjects were able to find the patterned series itself and all give the same responses.

Since this being a must be true question, we need to find the fact sets information itself

A) No correlation given in the stimulus
B) Subjects are able to find the series.
C) This information is not given in the stimulus
D) Yes...as per our fact set and assumption
E) They are able to identify..

Option D is the correct answer..

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 45

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2016
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 30

Location: Singapore
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2016, 17:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
mkjabc wrote:
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.

B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.

C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.

D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.

E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.


I am struggling to choose between A & D. For me D looks like a conclusion drawn directly from the statement and A looks like correct inference.

Can someone please help me out on this one? Also, if possible, please mention your take on how to differentiate an inference from a conclusion.

Mucho Gracias,

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 30

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Jan 2017
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 31

Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.9
CAT Tests
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2017, 03:12
Hi. I cannot choose the correct answer between A and E. Please Help.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 31

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Apr 2015
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Location: India
Schools: ESADE '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.7
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2017, 02:56
The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.
it can be inferred from this statement that the individuals were able to recognize some of the patterns from the original seven patterns but not all unless they were shown in the original order. So, "Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence" does not hold.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1070

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 533

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2017, 08:38
mkjabc wrote:
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.

B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.

C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.

D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.

E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.


The answer is D

Premise 1:In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen.
Premise 2: Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession
Premise 3: Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared


Conclusion: the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.



Subjects were able to recognize only the original patterns that they were shown.This means that the original patters were again showed in the same order thus that means the order was also same of the original patterns.

A is a trap as it does not tell us whether the patterns shown were in the same sequence as they were in original.
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 533

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Status: One more try
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 52

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 154

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Economics
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2017, 23:10
mkjabc wrote:
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.

B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.

C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.

D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.

E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.



big flowery trap in A. :cry:
A is unecessary using single occurence.Hence should be left alone
_________________

Believe you can and you are halfway there-Theodore Roosevelt

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 154

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 17

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V38
GPA: 3.05
WE: Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2017, 23:38
guhabhishek wrote:
mkjabc wrote:
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.

B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.

C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.

D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.

E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.



big flowery trap in A. :cry:
A is unecessary using single occurence.Hence should be left alone



Also, A speaks about visual recognition. The Argument talks about Visual Perception experiment. I think there is a subtle difference between the two
_________________

Sometimes you have to burn yourself to the ground before you can rise like a phoenix from the ashes.

Dr. Pratik



Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 17

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2017, 09:08
In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to view a series of patterns displayed on a screen. Each subject was shown seven patterns in quick succession. Subsequently, the scientist showed the same seven patterns in a variety of random orders and in combination with additional patterns. The subject was asked to note each time any of the seven patterns appeared, but the only time that the subject was able to recognize successfully all seven patterns was when they were shown in the exact order as they were shown originally.


If the information in the argument above is true, which one of the following represents the most reasonable inference that can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A. Visual recognition is not correlated to a single occurrence but rather to a connected series.
to Broad of a conclusion.
B. The subjects were unable to identify all seven individual patterns in the original order.
this choice is ok but we have a better answer as this does not talk about the pattern.
C. The subjects were aware that they were being tested on sequential perception.
No such premise provided.
D. Each subject could only recognize the original sequence that he had been shown.
Correct answer as the subject was able to recognize only the original sequence.
E. The subjects were unable to identify any of the original patterns that they had been shown.
the subject was able to recognize.Wrong answer.

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 18

Re: In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi   [#permalink] 08 Aug 2017, 09:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a visual perception experiment, a scientist asked individuals to vi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.