GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 02:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2012, 07:54
4
24
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (01:23) correct 34% (01:37) wrong based on 1459 sessions

### Show Tags

28 May 2014, 12:48
5
3
Quick version:

1) This statement lumps together T and I, so we'll never find T. Insufficient.

2) This relates T to the rest. T = .20(M+I). The ratio of T to other is 1 to 5, so the ratio of T to total is 1 to 6. We can now solve (1/6 of $12,000 is$2,000), but as soon as we see that we know the relation of T to the other parts (when we already know the total), we can stop. Sufficient.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

##### General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49301
Re: Last year if Arturo spent a total of $12,000 on his mortgage [#permalink] ### Show Tags 07 Dec 2012, 08:00 4 4 Last year, if Arturo spent a total of$12,000 on his mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, how much did he spend on his real estate taxes?

Let M, R, and H be the amounts that Arturo spent on mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, respectively.

Given: M + R + H = 12,000.
Question: R??

(1) Last year, the total amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes and home insurance was 33 1/3 percent of the amount that he spent on his mortgage payments --> 33 1/3 percent is 1/3 rd, thus given that R + H = M/3 --> M + R + H = M + M/3 = 12,000 --> M = 9,000 --> R + H = 12,000 - 9,000 = 3,000. R can take more than one value. Not sufficient.

(2) Last year, the amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes was 20 percent of the total amount he spent on his mortgage payments and home insurance --> given that R = (M + H)/5 --> 5R = M + H --> M + R + H = 5R + R = 12,000 --> 6R = 12,000 --> R = 2,000. Sufficient.

_________________
Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Posts: 26
Re: Last year if Arturo spent a total of $12,000 on his mortgage [#permalink] ### Show Tags 26 May 2014, 19:43 Walkabout wrote: Last year, if Arturo spent a total of$12,000 on his mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, how much did he spend on his real estate taxes?

(1) Last year, the total amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes and home insurance was 33 1/3 percent of the amount that he spent on his mortgage payments.

(2) Last year, the amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes was 20 percent of the total amount he spent on his mortgage payments and home insurance.

Problem: Tax+Morg+Ins=T+M+I=12 000

(1) T+I=331/3% x (12 000 -T -I) -------- (M=12 000 - T - I) Not sufficient.

(2) T=0.2 x (12 000 - T) --------------------(M+I=12 000 - T) Sufficient.

T+0.2T=2 400
T=2 400/1.2=2 000
Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 876
Last year if Arturo spent a total of $12,000 on his mortgage [#permalink] ### Show Tags 22 Aug 2018, 09:03 Bunuel wrote: Last year, if Arturo spent a total of$12,000 on his mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, how much did he spend on his real estate taxes?

Let M, R, and H be the amounts that Arturo spent on mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, respectively.

Given: M + R + H = 12,000.
Question: R??

(1) Last year, the total amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes and home insurance was 33 1/3 percent of the amount that he spent on his mortgage payments --> 33 1/3 percent is 1/3 rd, thus given that R + H = M/3 --> M + R + H = M + M/3 = 12,000 --> M = 9,000 --> R + H = 12,000 - 9,000 = 3,000. R can take more than one value. Not sufficient.

(2) Last year, the amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes was 20 percent of the total amount he spent on his mortgage payments and home insurance --> given that R = (M + H)/5 --> 5R = M + H --> M + R + H = 5R + R = 12,000 --> 6R = 12,000 --> R = 2,000. Sufficient.

when it says "Last year, the total amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes and home insurance was 33 1/3 percent of the amount that he spent on his mortgage payments "

I expressd the red part like this (R+H)0.30 = M why this equality didn't work ?

Same question applies for second statement "Last year, the amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes was 20 percent of the total amount he spent on his mortgage payments and home insurance "

i expressed the red part of sentance like this (M+H)0.20= R

here again it didnt work my equality why ?

what is the difference the way bunuel expressed R + H = M/3, R = (M + H)/5 and my equalities (R+H)0.30 = M , (M+H)0.20= R
_________________

In English I speak with a dictionary, and with people I am shy.

Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2016
Posts: 60
Location: Viet Nam
GPA: 3.54
Last year if Arturo spent a total of $12,000 on his mortgage [#permalink] ### Show Tags 22 Aug 2018, 11:02 2 dave13 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Last year, if Arturo spent a total of$12,000 on his mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, how much did he spend on his real estate taxes?

Let M, R, and H be the amounts that Arturo spent on mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and home insurance, respectively.

Given: M + R + H = 12,000.
Question: R??

(1) Last year, the total amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes and home insurance was 33 1/3 percent of the amount that he spent on his mortgage payments --> 33 1/3 percent is 1/3 rd, thus given that R + H = M/3 --> M + R + H = M + M/3 = 12,000 --> M = 9,000 --> R + H = 12,000 - 9,000 = 3,000. R can take more than one value. Not sufficient.

(2) Last year, the amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes was 20 percent of the total amount he spent on his mortgage payments and home insurance --> given that R = (M + H)/5 --> 5R = M + H --> M + R + H = 5R + R = 12,000 --> 6R = 12,000 --> R = 2,000. Sufficient.

when it says "Last year, the total amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes and home insurance was 33 1/3 percent of the amount that he spent on his mortgage payments "

I expressd the red part like this (R+H)0.30 = M why this equality didn't work ?

Same question applies for second statement "Last year, the amount that Arturo spent on his real estate taxes was 20 percent of the total amount he spent on his mortgage payments and home insurance "

i expressed the red part of sentance like this (M+H)0.20= R

here again it didnt work my equality why ?

what is the difference the way bunuel expressed R + H = M/3, R = (M + H)/5 and my equalities (R+H)0.30 = M , (M+H)0.20= R

1st statement: R+H = $$\frac{33+\frac{1}{3}}{100}* M = \frac{1}{3} * M$$ --> (R+H)*3 = M --> this is 3, not 0.3

2nd statement: $$R=\frac{20}{100}*(M+H)=\frac{1}{5}*(M+H)=0.2*(M+H)$$ --> Legend Bunuel 's expression and your expression are the same. You're right in this case.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.