hero_with_1000_faces
Hey
AndrewN, how are you doing ?
Need some help, I think this is a poor question and A seems to be incorrect as per my below reasoning.
Quote:
(A) whose murals are brilliantly colored, their geometrical symmetries embellished with old and new iconography and in a style that varies from woman to woman and house to house
Issue 1. I dont get how "embellished" past participle and in a style that varies are parallel, usage of "and" demands parallelism. IMO
Issue 2. From X to Y is the idiom, this usage seems so alien, From X to Y and X to Y. ? is the "from" understood to be repeated like ellipses ?
Issue 3. structural issue, I dont get the structure of A:
Sub+verb, modifier, and modifier ? don't we need an and between modifier 1 and modifier 2.
Appreciate your reply! always
Hello, Hero. I am doing fine, thank you for asking. I hope all is well on your end. To be straightforward, I have no problem with the question or OA. There is some embellishment going on in the question itself, but the basic structure is one of main clause + dependent clause + absolute phrase. Speaking to your points, the first issue hinges on the parallel components of an
and. Although identical parts of speech are as tightly parallel as can be, there is nothing wrong with a little mixing and matching, as long as the parallel components could be placed in reverse order without destroying the sentence. Try it out on the part of the sentence in question:
their geometrical symmetries in a style that varies from woman to woman and house to house and embellished with old and new iconographySure, I would
prefer a verb-turned-adjective before the prepositional phrase
in a style, but I would not write off the answer choice simply because I did not see
executed or
made, for example.
You seem to have worked out the second issue yourself, and this feature is what I meant earlier in mentioning embellishment within the question. There are simply two (parallel) elements here that fit into the
from X to Y construct, and yes, there is an understood
from at the head of the second element. We see this type of description used somewhat commonly in articles on, say, language:
... with dialects that vary from region to region and village to village. Notice that you could just as easily put the second part, about the villages, first.
I think I may have accidentally touched on your third concern first.
Whose murals are brilliantly colored is a clause, not a modifier in the same sense as a modifying phrase. Absolute phrase questions tend to cause GMAT™ aspirants a lot of grief. A lot of them appear as harder questions on this site, anyway.
In the end, I would not label the question "Poor quality." I would give it about an 8 out of 10. I would expect tighter parallelism regarding the first issue on the actual GMAT™, but remember, you always have to go by what is on the screen, and your goal is to select the best answer of the five choices presented.
I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask me about this question. As always, good luck with your studies.
- Andrew