Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 20 Jul 2019, 15:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56304
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2018, 06:40
2
23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

83% (02:04) correct 17% (02:12) wrong based on 1132 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Accordingly, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome.

C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction.

D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.


NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(CR05080)

_________________
Most Helpful Expert Reply
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 497
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2018, 10:54
3
2
553. Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Accordingly, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome.
C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction.
D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.


Type: Bolded Statement
BID (Boil It Down): Although expensive now, engineered seeds likely to be popular
Conclusion: The use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.
Evidence: Consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise.
Goal: Define the role of each statement, and the relationship between the two. Statement 1 tells us about an advance in seed tech to resist insect damage. Statement 2 reveals that most farmers won’t be financially advantaged by the technology.

Choice C is correct. The development introduced by the statement is the use of genetic engineering. The prediction is the conclusion: this use of genetically engineered seeds will become widespread. The second statement is that the farmers would not be compensated enough to use the genetically engineered seeds, which is a consideration that weighs AGAINST the prediction that the seeds will become widespread.

A. The first statement does provide context, but the second is not the conclusion, as shown in the analysis above.

B. The description of the first statement matches the correct choice well, but the second statement goes AGAINST the conclusion, as described in the explanation to the correct choice.

D. The first statement does not directly support a prediction, and the second statement is not a prediction.

E. The statements do not support the conclusion that the use of genetically engineered seeds is likely to become widespread. This is particularly true for the second statement, which supports the idea that the seeds might NOT become widespread.


C
_________________
General Discussion
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1676
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2018, 08:01
2
Question Type: Boldface

Argument: Use of genetic seeds is likely to become widespread.

A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion. - BF2 isn't the argument's main conclusion.

B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome. - BF2 says use of genetic engineered seeds isn't going to become widespread because of the cost issues that are highlighted. In a way, BF2 doesn't support BF1.

C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction. - Correct

D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction. - BF1 doesn't defend BF2.

E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion. - As explained in C, BF2 doesn't support the main conclusion.

Answer: C
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Location: India
GPA: 3.66
WE: Marketing (Real Estate)
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2018, 19:57
Answer is C.

In my opinion the first boldface plays the role of background information and the second boldface is a counter premise.

A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
The first part of the statement is correct but the main conclusion of the argument is "The growth of engineered seeds...widespread".

B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome.
First part of the statement is correct but the second part is not that outcome it is meant to contribute to. It is the exact opposite of the outcome it is meant to contribute to.

C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction.
Right answer.

D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
The second is not the prediction the argument seeks to defend. Prediction is the conclusion and we have identified the conclusion to be the last line in the argument.

E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
Both boldfaces are not premises, one is background information and another is a counterpremise.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 517
Location: India
Premium Member
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2018, 23:33
Bunuel wrote:
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Accordingly, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome.

C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction.

D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.


NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(CR05080)


Question Type: Bold face

Conclusion: Since consumer demand for items without pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds is here to stay.

Analysis:
Bold face 1: States a fact, that introduces the argument & acts as a opening premise for the conclusion

Bold face 2: It states one of the probable consequences of use of genetically engineered seeds, citing the cost implication for the farmers. This acts as a counter argument against the conclusion.

A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion. - Incorrect, the second part is not the main conclusion.

B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome. - Incorrect. The second part does not contribute to bring about the argument.

C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction. - Correct.

D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction. - Incorrect. the first does not support the second part

E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion. - Incorrect, the second does not support the conclusion.

Answer C.

Thanks,
GyM
_________________
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 05:35
1. Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. --- fact
Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.--- fact
2. Accordingly, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. --- assumption.
However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, --- contrast/plan
the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread. --- effect of plan/ main conclusion

verdict : 1st is supporting conclusion. 2nd is assumption which is weakening the conclusion.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion. ---- 2nd is not the main conclusion.

B. The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that, according to the argument, contributes to bringing about that outcome. --- 1st seems ok. 2nd is not correct.

C. The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that tends to weigh against that prediction. --- most close and on the lines of verdict.

D. The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction. --- 2nd is not a prediction. 1st is also not the best.

E. The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion. --- wrong.
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 05:38
Question of same type:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/plant-scient ... 59269.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/plant-scient ... 42128.html
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4815
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 17:45
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro   [#permalink] 16 Jul 2019, 17:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce cro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne