GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 11 Dec 2018, 23:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Prep Hour

     December 11, 2018

     December 11, 2018

     09:00 PM EST

     10:00 PM EST

    Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
B
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 537
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2017, 12:05
12
Top Contributor
46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:29) correct 32% (01:36) wrong based on 2176 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Sentence Correction
Question No.: 763

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves.

(A) account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been
(B) of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz
(C) the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been
(D) the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz
(E) explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz

_________________

Md. Abdur Rakib

Please Press +1 Kudos,If it helps
Sentence Correction-Collection of Ron Purewal's "elliptical construction/analogies" for SC Challenges

Most Helpful Expert Reply
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2768
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 08:55
12
somtsat99 wrote:
elegantm wrote:
This question tests Parallelism. Parallelism that we need to check may follow either of the 3 below mentioned patterns-
Pattern 1 - Explain the presence of X, Y, & Z - Correct
Pattern 2 - Explain the presence of X, the presence of Y, & the presence of Z - Correct
Pattern 3 - Explain the presence of X, Explain the presence of Y, & Explain the presence of Z - Correct


A) Follows Pattern 2, But use of ACCOUNT FOR is unjustified. Hence Incorrect
B) Follows Pattern 1. Hence Correct
C) Follows mix of Patterns 1, 2, & 3. Hence Incorrect
D) Follows mix of Patterns 2 & 3. Hence Incorrect
E) Follows mix of Patterns 3 & 2. Hence Incorrect


But is follows presence of X and Of Y.

Posted from my mobile device



Hello somtsat99,


I am just adding my two cents here. When the elements in a parallel list are big phrases, the scope of possible parallel elements also increase by far.

Let's take a look at the sentence with the correct answer choice B:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence
    of a buried crater,
    of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and
    of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.


Since all the three elements are prepositional phrases, they are perfectly parallel.

Since of has been used in all the three elements, another possible parallel list can be what elegantm has stated in his post as Pattern 1.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Most Helpful Community Reply
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 28 May 2017
Posts: 285
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2017, 00:34
15
4
This question tests Parallelism. Parallelism that we need to check may follow either of the 3 below mentioned patterns-
Pattern 1 - Explain the presence of X, Y, & Z - Correct
Pattern 2 - Explain the presence of X, the presence of Y, & the presence of Z - Correct
Pattern 3 - Explain the presence of X, Explain the presence of Y, & Explain the presence of Z - Correct


A) Follows Pattern 2, But use of ACCOUNT FOR is unjustified. Hence Incorrect
B) Follows Pattern 1. Hence Correct
C) Follows mix of Patterns 1, 2, & 3. Hence Incorrect
D) Follows mix of Patterns 2 & 3. Hence Incorrect
E) Follows mix of Patterns 3 & 2. Hence Incorrect
_________________

If you like the post, show appreciation by pressing Kudos button

General Discussion
SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1687
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2017, 19:43
9
1
Topic Tested: Parallelism

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves. -- The original sentence is not parallel

A. account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been - Incorrect. Parallelism error.

B. of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz - Correct. would explain the presence of a buried crater, of the element iridium, and of quartz.

C. the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been - Incorrect. would explain the presence of x, y and explain the presence of z is not parallel again.

D. the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz - Incorrect. Parallelism error again.

E. explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz - Incorrect. Parallelism error.

Answer: B
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 635
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2017, 22:38
1
AbdurRakib wrote:
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves.
A. account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been
B. of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz
C. the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been
D. the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz
E. explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz


The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Sentence Correction
Question No.: 763


||ism ...
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves.

lets plug in option B

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz shattered by high-impact shocks wave.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Status: MBA Candidate Class of 2020
Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 112
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V31
GPA: 4
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 08:30
1
elegantm wrote:
This question tests Parallelism. Parallelism that we need to check may follow either of the 3 below mentioned patterns-
Pattern 1 - Explain the presence of X, Y, & Z - Correct
Pattern 2 - Explain the presence of X, the presence of Y, & the presence of Z - Correct
Pattern 3 - Explain the presence of X, Explain the presence of Y, & Explain the presence of Z - Correct


A) Follows Pattern 2, But use of ACCOUNT FOR is unjustified. Hence Incorrect
B) Follows Pattern 1. Hence Correct
C) Follows mix of Patterns 1, 2, & 3. Hence Incorrect
D) Follows mix of Patterns 2 & 3. Hence Incorrect
E) Follows mix of Patterns 3 & 2. Hence Incorrect


But is follows presence of X and Of Y.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 99
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 09:51
1
Could someone clarify how D is wrong?

Here is the sentence with D:
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and [would] explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

Just before this post, I read:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/your-verbal- ... 46533.html
which suggests not be over fixated with true parallel structure to the hilt.
Shouldn't there be more than just parallelism error for us to eliminate choices?
VP
VP
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1028
Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 18:52
1
sevenplusplus wrote:
Could someone clarify how D is wrong?

Here is the sentence with D:
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and [would] explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

Hi sevenplusplus, let's look at the sentence with D again:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

By the intended meaning of the sentence, hopefully it's clear would explain is trying to explain three elements. In D, the repetition of the presence in the second element suggests that the way to do (what we call as) XYZ deconstruct is:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain

i) X: the presence of a buried crater
ii) Y: the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth)
iii) Z: explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

Once we have done this deconstruct, the common portion of the sentence (in this case Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain) should individually make sense with X, with Y, and with Z.

In D, this common portion is not making sense with Z, because the sentence would read:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

explain explain is clearly incorrect.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses this very powerful method of tackling parallelism (XYZ deconstruct) , its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 99
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 18:58
1
EducationAisle wrote:
sevenplusplus wrote:
Could someone clarify how D is wrong?

Here is the sentence with D:
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and [would] explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

Hi sevenplusplus, let's look at the sentence with D again:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

By the intended meaning of the sentence, hopefully it's clear would explain is trying to explain three elements. In D, the repetition of the presence in the second element suggests that the way to do (what we call as) XYZ deconstruct is:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain

i) X: the presence of a buried crater
ii) Y: the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth)
iii) Z: explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

Once we have done this deconstruct, the common portion of the sentence (in this case Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain) should individually make sense with X, with Y, and with Z.

In D, this common portion is not making sense with Z, because the sentence would read:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

explain explain is clearly incorrect.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses this very powerful method of tackling parallelism (XYZ deconstruct) , its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.


Thanks for the reply. How do we know that "would explain" is "out" of the XYZ deconstruct? My argument is that it could be considered part of each X, Y, Z.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
VP
VP
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1028
Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 20:04
1
sevenplusplus wrote:
Thanks for the reply. How do we know that "would explain" is "out" of the XYZ deconstruct? My argument is that it could be considered part of each X, Y, Z.

Sure. So, let's try putting would explain within the XYZ deconstruct.

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period

i) X: would explain the presence of a buried crater
ii) Y: would explain the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth)
iii) Z: would explain explain the presence of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.

Again, as is evident, Z (would explain explain the presence...) is incorrect.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 23
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2017, 07:04
2
Vyshak wrote:
Topic Tested: Parallelism

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves. -- The original sentence is not parallel

A. account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been - Incorrect. Parallelism error.

B. of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz - Correct. would explain the presence of a buried crater, of the element iridium, and of quartz.

C. the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been - Incorrect. would explain the presence of x, y and explain the presence of z is not parallel again.

D. the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz - Incorrect. Parallelism error again.

E. explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz - Incorrect. Parallelism error.

Answer: B



Hi Vyshak ,

I have a doubt here. When do we use a comma before 'and'?
Usually its like a,b and c.
In what conditions, do we use- a,b, and c? and what's the difference?

Really appreciate if you or anyone on this forum can explain.

Regards,
ashygoyal
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1067
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2017, 10:54
1
Imo B
The parallelism is maintained in B
The structure of the list is X,Y and Z
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1268
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2018, 02:31
1
GMATNinja VeritasPrepKarishma


Quote:
Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves.


Quote:
(B) of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz

Why do we need preposition of before two element names?

Quote:
(C) the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been

Is modifier having been correctly used to denote quartz was shattered earlier and than its presence was detected?
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

EMPOWERgmat Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 374
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2018, 10:39
1
Hello Everyone!

This looks like a great example of a GMAT question that focuses on parallel structure! Let's go through each option carefully to narrow them down to the right answer! To get started, here is the original question:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves.

(A) account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been
(B) of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz
(C) the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been
(D) the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz
(E) explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz

One important sign that we're dealing with parallelism is when the options are part of a list. Any time you see a list, it's a good idea to start by asking yourself, "Is each item in the list worded/structured similarly?" Let's take a closer look at each option to throw out any answers that aren't parallel. To make it easier to spot, I've included the non-underlined part of the list because everything MUST match that in structure, verb tense, and tone:

(A) would explain the presence of a buried crater,
account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth),
and the presence of quartz having been

This option is NOT PARALLEL because each item in the list is introduced using a different verb, or none at all: explain / account for / no verb. Therefore, this is INCORRECT because it's not parallel.

(B) would explain the presence of a buried crater,
of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth),
and of quartz

This option is PARALLEL because each item is introduced in a similar manner (using the word "of"). It's much simpler and more concise, too! Therefore, this is the CORRECT option because it uses parallel structure.

(C) would explain the presence of a buried crater,
the element iridium (originating deep within the earth),
and explain the presence of quartz having been

This option is NOT PARALLEL because only 2 out of 3 items starts with "explain the presence of." For this to be parallel, all 3 items need to match. Therefore, this is another INCORRECT option!

(D) would explain the presence of a buried crater,
the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth),
and explain the presence of quartz

This option is also NOT PARALLEL because it only uses the verb "explain" in 2 of 3 items in the list. They're very close to parallel, but not quite good enough! Therefore, this option is INCORRECT because it doesn't use parallel structure.

(E) would explain the presence of a buried crater,
explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth),
and the presence of quartz

This option is NOT PARALLEL because each item uses different combinations of the phrases "explain the presence of," "explain," and "the presence of." For this to be parallel, all 3 items need to match. Therefore, this option is INCORRECT because it doesn't use parallel structure.

There you go - option B is the correct answer because it's the only one that uses parallel structure!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________

"Students study. GMAT assassins train."
Image

Image

★★★★★ GMAT Club Verified Reviews for EMPOWERgmat & Special Discount


GMAT Club Verbal Advantage EMPOWERgmat Critical Reasoning Question Pack

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Posts: 11
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2018, 03:05
egmat wrote:
somtsat99 wrote:
elegantm wrote:
This question tests Parallelism. Parallelism that we need to check may follow either of the 3 below mentioned patterns-
Pattern 1 - Explain the presence of X, Y, & Z - Correct
Pattern 2 - Explain the presence of X, the presence of Y, & the presence of Z - Correct
Pattern 3 - Explain the presence of X, Explain the presence of Y, & Explain the presence of Z - Correct


A) Follows Pattern 2, But use of ACCOUNT FOR is unjustified. Hence Incorrect
B) Follows Pattern 1. Hence Correct
C) Follows mix of Patterns 1, 2, & 3. Hence Incorrect
D) Follows mix of Patterns 2 & 3. Hence Incorrect
E) Follows mix of Patterns 3 & 2. Hence Incorrect


But is follows presence of X and Of Y.

Posted from my mobile device



Hello somtsat99,


I am just adding my two cents here. When the elements in a parallel list are big phrases, the scope of possible parallel elements also increase by far.

Let's take a look at the sentence with the correct answer choice B:

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence
    of a buried crater,
    of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and
    of quartz shattered by high-impact shock waves.


Since all the three elements are prepositional phrases, they are perfectly parallel.

Since of has been used in all the three elements, another possible parallel list can be what elegantm has stated in his post as Pattern 1.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha


So the use of 'of' before each element of the list is not needed but is not incorrect either?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Posts: 89
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 2.73
Premium Member
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2018, 23:57
Sentence Analysis
Here’s the sentence structure:

Positing (A gerund. Main Subject)
an enormous volcanic explosion (Object of ‘Positing’, answering ‘positing what?’)
at the end of the Permian period (Prepositional phrase modifying ‘Positing’)
would explain the presence of a buried crater, (Main Verb: would explain)
account for the presence of the element iridium (‘account’ is parallel to ‘explain’ and is thus a part of the main verb)
(originating deep within the earth), (Verb-ing modifiers modifying ‘iridium’)
and the presence of quartz (Noun ‘the presence’ violates parallelism. Something parallel to ‘explain’ and ‘account’ was needed here.)
having been shattered by high-impact shock waves. (Perfect participle modifying ‘quartz’)
The sentence says that proposing something (a volcanic explosion) at the end of a time (the Permian period) would explain a few things: the presence of a buried crater, the presence of the element iridium, and the presence of quartz that has been shattered by shock waves.

The sentence has the following problems:

Parallelism – The sentence has a deterministic error that ‘the presence of quartz’ is not parallel to ‘explain’ and ‘account’.
The use of the perfect participle ‘having been shattered’ is incorrect here (Deterministic error). We are not presenting a sequence of actions here (It doesn’t make sense to sequence the actions ‘explaining the presence of quartz’ and ‘the shattering of quartz’. These are two very unrelated events). We just need to provide additional information about quartz that it was shattered by high-impact shock waves. Therefore, we need either a verb-ed modifier ‘quartz shattered by …’ or a relative clause ‘quartz that was shattered by…’.
Since ‘account for’ and ‘explain’ mean the same thing, we can skip ‘account for’ in the second element of the list. This is a quality issue. On the same lines, since all the three elements of the list are about ‘the presence of something’, we need not repeat the words ‘the presence of’ in each element of the list.
_________________

If you like this post, be kind and help me with Kudos!

Cheers!

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Posts: 217
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: Tuck '19
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2018, 16:31
AbdurRakib wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Sentence Correction
Question No.: 763

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian period would explain the presence of a buried crater, account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been shattered by high-impact shock waves.

(A) account for the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz having been
(B) of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and of quartz
(C) the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz having been
(D) the presence of the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and explain the presence of quartz
(E) explain the element iridium (originating deep within the earth), and the presence of quartz



Hi Experts,
I understand the parallelism issue here.

But I have a few queries regarding option A.

1.Can someone please explain the usage of passive construct "having been shattered at"
2.explain the X,account for ,the presence of ..
I assume (explain and account are verbs ) and presence is noun so structuaraly not possible.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri &nbs [#permalink] 12 Oct 2018, 16:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Positing an enormous volcanic explosion at the end of the Permian peri

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.