MartyTargetTestPrep
Asad
MartyTargetTestPrepThe spoiler says that the correct answer is E, but E is not legit to me. In E,
fox’s is adjective. We can't use any
non-possessive pronoun (
it) of this Possessive Noun (
fox’s ); we must use the Possessive Pronoun (
its) of possessive noun
fox’s. At least, I never see this type of use in any official SC. Help me if I miss anything here, please.
Thanks__
Hi Asad.
Actually, there are official SC questions in which, in the correct answers, the only logical referents of personal pronouns are nouns in the possessive form.
For further discussion of this topic, please see the posts preceding yours in this thread.
MartyTargetTestPrepThank you sir for citing the official question, which is considered the exceptional one (some people consider it as exceptional).
Quote:
Although she was considered among her contemporaries to be the better poet than her husband, later Elizabeth Barrett Browning was overshadowed by his success.
(A) Although she was considered among her contemporaries to be the better poet than her husband, later Elizabeth Barrett Browning was overshadowed by his success.
(B) Although Elizabeth Barrett Browning was considered among her contemporaries as a better poet than her husband, she was later overshadowed by his success.
(C) Later overshadowed by the success of her husband, Elizabeth Barrett Browning's poetry had been considered among her contemporaries to be better than that of her husband.
(D) Although
Elizabeth Barrett Browning's success was later overshadowed by that of
her husband, among
her contemporaries
she was considered the better poet.
(E) Elizabeth Barrett Browning's poetry was considered among her contemporaries as better than her husband, but her success was later overshadowed by his.
Sir,
In D, possessive noun (
Elizabeth Barrett Browning's) with possessive pronoun (
her) is perfectly fine. But, the problem is in "possessive noun" (
Elizabeth Barrett Browning's ) with "non-possessive pronoun" (
she ). We did not
directly get this "non-possessive pronoun" (
she) from "possessive noun" (
Elizabeth Barrett Browning's); we got "possessive pronoun" (
her) first. From my understanding, "possessive pronoun" (
her) with "non-possessive pronoun" (
she) make sense at least for this case!
But,
non-possessive pronoun (
it) with "Possessive Noun" (
fox’s ) does not make sense to me
without having any indication of Possessive Pronoun (
its)
in a same sentence. Could you shade more lights on it, please? Thanks__