woohoo921
KarishmaB
paddyboy
Hi
i have doubt with option E.
"cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but"
"The first trenches cut into........." is a clause.
I think cut is a verb for the subject "first trenches"......Now in the same sentence, another verb "have yielded" too stands fr the subject "The first trenches"
So my doubt is hwo can there be two verb fr the same subject, when there is no connector.
"cut into a 500 acre ..." is a modifier. It modifies 'trenches' i.e. it tells you more about the trenches.
As pointed out by Vercules above, "cut into a 500 acre" can be replaced by "that were cut into a 500 acre". The meaning doesn't change but you can see clearly that "cut into..." is modifying trenches.
The verb is 'have yielded'.
KarishmaBI am a bit confused on the parallelism requirement mentioned above
"were arising simultaneously but independently of southern Mesopotamia --> NOT PARALLEL
were arising simultaneously with but independently of southern Mesopotamia --> PARALLEL"
What does the "with" mean in this case? Does it mean that the societies arose when southern Mesopotamia arose, but they were not connected to southern Mesopotamia?
This is what the 'that' clause is:
... societies ... arose simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia ...
It connects two ideas:
... societies ... arose simultaneously with the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia ...
... societies ... arose independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia ...
Using 'but' we have connected both these ideas together but if separated they both should make sense with the rest of the sentence.
If we remove 'with,' this is what we get:
... societies ... arose simultaneously but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia ...
which breaks into two like this:
... societies ... arose simultaneously of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia ... (doesn't make sense)
... societies ... arose independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia ... (acceptable)
Societies can rise simultaneously with city-states..., not simultaneously of city-states ...
Hence, we need the 'with' we have put after 'simultaneously.'