GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 25 Sep 2018, 21:56

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 217
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.54
Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2017, 09:07
1
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (00:53) correct 27% (01:11) wrong based on 178 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the number of un-recycled soda cans to half. The un-recycled soda cans were about 10 per person then. Currently the soda cans that are un-recycled are only 5 per person. Clearly, the state has met its goal.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) People are increasingly becoming aware of the harmful effects of drinking soda.
B) There is little damage to the overall soft drink industry due to the negative publicity generated by the recycling campaign.
C) Lonsia is not the only state that is concerned about recycling.
D) The total population of the state of Lonsia has not increased substantially in the past two years.
E) The per-capita consumption of soda in the state of Lonsia has not increased during the past two years.

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1385
Location: Viet Nam
Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2017, 09:18
sunny91 wrote:
Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the number of un-recycled soda cans to half. The un-recycled soda cans were about 10 per person then. Currently the soda cans that are un-recycled are only 5 per person. Clearly, the state has met its goal.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) People are increasingly becoming aware of the harmful effects of drinking soda.
B) There is little damage to the overall soft drink industry due to the negative publicity generated by the recycling campaign.
C) Lonsia is not the only state that is concerned about recycling.
D) The total population of the state of Lonsia has not increased substantially in the past two years.
E) The per-capita consumption of soda in the state of Lonsia has not increased during the past two years.

Only D is relevant to the argument. D indicates that the reduction in un-recycled soda cans per person is not due to the increase in the population.
_________________
Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 539
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2017, 09:26
Straight D.
Let's say we have 10 people and the un-recycled soda cans were about 10 per person then --> 100 cans
now un-recycled soda cans are about 5 per person --> 10*5 = 50....decreased

But here we are assuming that we still have 10 people. It the population substantially increases to 30, we would have 30*5 = 150.--> not decreased.

So we are assuming The total population of the state has not increased substantially in the past two years.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq

Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2017, 07:46
D is a weakening choice and not an assumption. Can someone explain please.
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 125
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
Schools: IIMA (II)
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2017, 11:08
samay1305 wrote:
D is a weakening choice and not an assumption. Can someone explain please.

D is a perfect assumption. can you tell why you are considering it as a weakener, so that we can understand what is the flaw in your thinking?
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2013
Posts: 137
Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2017, 00:44
Number of soda-cans per person might have reduced, but if the total number of people have increased, then the total number of un-recycled soda-cans could actually have increased.

I had a question. I understand that D is the best of the given choices, but it says that the total population of the state of Lonsia has not increased substantially in the past two years. "increased substantially" looks slightly generic to me. Should it have been that the total population of the state of Lonsia has not more than doubled in the past two years.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2104
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2017, 06:51
Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the number of un-recycled soda cans to half. The un-recycled soda cans were about 10 per person then. Currently the soda cans that are un-recycled are only 5 per person. Clearly, the state has met its goal.

Type - assumption
Boil it down - suppose two years ago , total population was 10 and the number of un-recycled soda cans was 100 .
- What if the population has now increased to 20 , but the number of un-recycled soda cans is 100 . If this is true , then our claim will not hold water .

A) People are increasingly becoming aware of the harmful effects of drinking soda. - Irrelevant
B) There is little damage to the overall soft drink industry due to the negative publicity generated by the recycling campaign. - Irrelevant
C) Lonsia is not the only state that is concerned about recycling. - Irrelevant
D) The total population of the state of Lonsia has not increased substantially in the past two years. - Correct - negate this statement and the argument falls apart
E) The per-capita consumption of soda in the state of Lonsia has not increased during the past two years. ISWAT - even if per-capita consumption has increased of soda has increased , it does not matter since we are only concerned with the number of un-recycled soda cans.

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Re: Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the &nbs [#permalink] 30 Nov 2017, 06:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two years ago, the state of Lonsia declared the goal of reducing the

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.