samsung1234
Hi
AndrewNI have often heard that the GMAT is moving away from testing idioms. Based on this, do you think that this would be a fair question nowadays?
Good question,
samsung1234. I think idioms will always play a part in SC questions. Why? Because it is virtually impossible to create difficult, meaning-based questions without going beyond mechanical issues such as subject-verb agreement, modifiers, or parallelism. I would add, however, that I see fewer questions in more recent editions of the OG that rely on idiomatic usage as the
sole consideration between the correct answer and an incorrect trap. Some older questions I have seen might have a single word underlined, and I think those questions are falling by the wayside as the international pool of test-takers increases.
So, do I think the above question could appear as such on the current GMAT™? Yes, I do. Comparisons are quite often tested, and this question is bound within one, requiring a careful read to avoid making a hasty conclusion. You have to ask yourself,
Are like entities being compared? When I scan the answer choices, I see the following:
(A) country-to-union comparison
X(B) union-to-union comparison
√(C) missing
in in country-to-country comparison
X(D) union-to-country comparison
X(E) union-to-union comparison
√Now, between (B) and (E), even without resorting to idioms, you can ask yourself whether the infinitive form
to organize at the tail-end of the underlined portion is incorrect. If the answer is no, then there is no way to attack (B). It is okay to be unsure about (E), but you do not want to chase what could be the correct answer. Work from a place of comfort instead and seek to disprove what you can.
- Andrew