Last visit was: 12 Dec 2024, 07:07 It is currently 12 Dec 2024, 07:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,846
Own Kudos:
685,289
 [3]
Given Kudos: 88,255
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,846
Kudos: 685,289
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,846
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,255
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,846
Kudos: 685,289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
forsellingonline1
Joined: 03 Nov 2015
Last visit: 18 Jan 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
venkateshksep24
Joined: 04 Apr 2017
Last visit: 15 Jan 2018
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Products:
Posts: 7
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate.
avatar
tejasa07
Joined: 11 Jul 2017
Last visit: 28 Mar 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 13
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question.
Please evaluate my approach: Negate option A, the statement is weakened.
User avatar
sahilvijay
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 16 Apr 2021
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
846
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
Posts: 305
Kudos: 846
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
forsellingonline1
What if there are students who are not able to hear?
How will option A work in that case?


Then he will not be sitting in phonics class but he will be sitting in visual expression class.. :cool:
avatar
shivarora306
Joined: 29 Mar 2017
Last visit: 13 Mar 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Our reading program teaches third graders to use phonics to sound out multi-syllabic words by pronouncing prefixes and suffixes separately from base words, and then reading the word parts all together. Since children are still primarily reading aloud at this age, this approach ensures comprehension even in books that contain a high percentage of multi-syllabic words.

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?


A. Students will recognize multi-syllabic words when they hear them.
B. Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes.
C. Third graders struggle more than other students with multi-syllabic words.
D. Comprehension is less important than sounding out words.
E. Other reading programs do not focus on multi-syllabic words.


Situation: A reading program teaches third-graders to sound out multi-syllabic words in order to understand them.

Reasoning: Which identifies the assumption underlying the program’s approach? The reading program teaches students a way of breaking down words and sounding them out. This strategy, together with the fact that children are still primarily reading aloud at this age, makes it clear that children are expected to recognize the words once they hear them.
  1. The program’s emphasis is on using sounds to figure out long words, making clear the assumption that children will recognize the words if they can only pronounce them.
  2. The passage does not make this claim for all multi-syllabic words.
  3. Third graders are not compared with other students in the passage.
  4. In fact, the passage states that words are sounded out so that comprehension can be ensured.
  5. Other reading programs are not compared in the passage.

Answer: A

My question is -
Is "recognizing" a word considered equivalent to "comprehending" it in the deemed correct answer choice?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
shaarang
Joined: 06 Sep 2018
Last visit: 06 Apr 2021
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Our reading program teaches third graders to use phonics to sound out multi-syllabic words by pronouncing prefixes and suffixes separately from base words, and then reading the word parts all together. Since children are still primarily reading aloud at this age, this approach ensures comprehension even in books that contain a high percentage of multi-syllabic words.

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?


A. Students will recognize multi-syllabic words when they hear them.

comprehension
noun /ˌkɑːm.prəˈhen.ʃən/
the ability to understand completely and be familiar with a situation, facts, etc.

Comprehension and recognizing have two fundamentally different meanings. While the other answer choices don't make sense either, "recognize" threw me off and I ended up selecting an answer choice I knew made little sense. I only say this because I encountered this problem on the test, and I hope it gets fixed, and if there's no reason to fix it, I'd like an expert's explanation reconciling the discrepancy.

I've never encountered anything like this in an official GMAT problem and usually, the gap between "comprehension" and "recognize" is why answers are incorrect.
User avatar
StringArgs
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Status:Patience
Location: India
Posts: 53
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here the assumption is actually: hearing the words helps better comprehend the words.

My interpretation of A was:
A. Students will recognize multi-syllabic words when they hear them: How does recognizing if a word is a tough one help the a child better understand/comprehend it? I marked B instead as I found A irrelevant.

B said that: Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes. Even though this isnt quite the main assumption of the statement one can say that the kids better comprehend all big words because they can read aloud the prefix and the suffix (assuming all big words have prefix and suffix)

In the Answer provided however it is assumed that recognize=comprehend (which I dont think is quite right, i'd say one would not face such an issue with a official question). If we let that pass we get the main assumption i.e. The students will recognize/understand the word when they HEAR them aloud.
User avatar
Saksham337
Joined: 20 Jul 2024
Last visit: 04 Dec 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Recongize does not mean comprehend. Negating option A, provided the correct meaning of recognize, does not destroy our conclusion. Option B, while extreme, is a required assumption because the whole concept of the reading program was to use sounds by pronouncing prefixes and suffices, which leads to comprehension. If the multi-syllabic words are not all composed of pre/suf then how would the logical flow work behind the concept? I understand "all" is a put-off but this option is the best of the lot, in spite of that, in my opinion.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 39,357
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21,578
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,357
Kudos: 76,704
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you for the point. I agree about the recognize vs. comprehend. I have updated the question appropriately.

In terms of the option B, that's a trap assumption. It is indeed an assumption that the words that kids are reading have prefixes and suffixes. However, the question asks

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?

The subject is not words but third grader's comprehension. The question is looking for assumptions related directly to how third graders comprehend multi-syllabic words. The assumption needs to be something that underpins the teaching strategy employed by the program, specifically aimed at aiding comprehension. Answer B, stating that "Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes," discusses the structure of words rather than how children comprehend them, and is not relevant to the question asked (relevant to the reading program but not the question). There are other reasons why B is wrong but this is the easiest to explain for me. :angel:





Saksham337
Recongize does not mean comprehend. Negating option A, provided the correct meaning of recognize, does not destroy our conclusion. Option B, while extreme, is a required assumption because the whole concept of the reading program was to use sounds by pronouncing prefixes and suffices, which leads to comprehension. If the multi-syllabic words are not all composed of pre/suf then how would the logical flow work behind the concept? I understand "all" is a put-off but this option is the best of the lot, in spite of that, in my opinion.
User avatar
Saksham337
Joined: 20 Jul 2024
Last visit: 04 Dec 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
That makes sense. Thank you so much!
bb
Thank you for the point. I agree about the recognize vs. comprehend. I have updated the question appropriately.

In terms of the option B, that's a trap assumption. It is indeed an assumption that the words that kids are reading have prefixes and suffixes. However, the question asks

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?

The subject is not words but third grader's comprehension. The question is looking for assumptions related directly to how third graders comprehend multi-syllabic words. The assumption needs to be something that underpins the teaching strategy employed by the program, specifically aimed at aiding comprehension. Answer B, stating that "Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes," discusses the structure of words rather than how children comprehend them, and is not relevant to the question asked (relevant to the reading program but not the question). There are other reasons why B is wrong but this is the easiest to explain for me. :angel:





Saksham337
Recongize does not mean comprehend. Negating option A, provided the correct meaning of recognize, does not destroy our conclusion. Option B, while extreme, is a required assumption because the whole concept of the reading program was to use sounds by pronouncing prefixes and suffices, which leads to comprehension. If the multi-syllabic words are not all composed of pre/suf then how would the logical flow work behind the concept? I understand "all" is a put-off but this option is the best of the lot, in spite of that, in my opinion.
Moderators:
Math Expert
97845 posts
Founder
39357 posts