It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 12:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

While the United States Constitution specifies

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Top Contributor
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 570

Kudos [?]: 2660 [0], given: 220

Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2016, 13:59
Top Contributor
13
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:07) correct 30% (01:02) wrong based on 638 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Md. Abdur Rakib

Please Press +1 Kudos,If it helps
Sentence Correction-Collection of Ron Purewal's "elliptical construction/analogies" for SC Challenges

Kudos [?]: 2660 [0], given: 220

Top Contributor
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7872 [1], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2016, 23:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Top Contributor
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice ---- if is wrong; this is not a conditional situation. \ shift of tense to past tense is also wrong

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice------ No conditionals here.

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice -- correct choice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President -- specifying a person may give the wrong meaning that the constitution is trying to specify a specific person. We do need the connector ‘that’ essentially in a reported speech as this.

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice –same as in D plus the wrong use of the conditional.

I do not think there is a great split between the use of twice and two times. Both essentially mean the same; twice is more formal than two-times. Maybe GMAT will like twice rather two times.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509


Last edited by daagh on 13 May 2017, 09:04, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 7872 [1], given: 363

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 May 2016
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 345

CAT Tests
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2016, 00:21
confused between B and C
In error analysis of A ....while X states something , it does not state is right use of tense.....

another error is,(experts please correct if I am wrong)
IInd part needs to be a question if someone who has already been seleted, this means that person is still a president
then part hs to be future in this case. would is wrong.
B changes the meaning here by changing IInd part. a person who elected in past (changes the meaning )

C is the answer. please correct me if anything wrong

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 345

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 57

GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.5
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 07:38
mbaprep2016 wrote:
confused between B and C
In error analysis of A ....while X states something , it does not state is right use of tense.....

another error is,(experts please correct if I am wrong)
IInd part needs to be a question if someone who has already been seleted, this means that person is still a president
then part hs to be future in this case. would is wrong.
B changes the meaning here by changing IInd part. a person who elected in past (changes the meaning )

C is the answer. please correct me if anything wrong


The problem with b is not past tense saying he was elected twice would be correct. Use of conditional If is wrong here. Here 'whether' is required to convey the intention of the original sentence.
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos :)

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 57

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 10

Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 00:26
Could some one explain why the use of the conditional is wrong ? Would is used in the non-underlined portion of the sentence right ?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 10

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Status: active
Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 166

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 10

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 4
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 04:12
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times,it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times,it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice,it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice


for reported speech
that is used and makes more sense
D and E are out

In A and B If condition is not correct as there is no logic if ...then...
whether is used
C is best

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 10

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 319

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 88

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2017, 02:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
daagh wrote:
A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice ---- if is wrong; this is not a conditional situation. \ shift of tense tom past tense is also wrong

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice------ No conditionals here.

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice -- correct choice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President -- specifying a person may give the wrong meaning that the constitution is trying to specify a specific person. We do need the connector ‘that’ essentially in a reported speech as this.

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice –same as in D plus the wrong use of the conditional.

I do not think there is a great split between the use of twice and two times. Both essentially mean the same; twice is more formal than two-times. Maybe GMAT will like twice rather two times.



hi,
DAAGH sir
could you please explain what is difference btw more than twice and more than two times ! and which is more preferred in GMAT

thanks

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 88

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: Profile 1
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 40

GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2017, 06:30
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

daagh wrote:
A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice ---- if is wrong; this is not a conditional situation. \ shift of tense tom past tense is also wrong

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice------ No conditionals here.

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice -- correct choice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President -- specifying a person may give the wrong meaning that the constitution is trying to specify a specific person. We do need the connector ‘that’ essentially in a reported speech as this.

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice –same as in D plus the wrong use of the conditional.

I do not think there is a great split between the use of twice and two times. Both essentially mean the same; twice is more formal than two-times. Maybe GMAT will like twice rather two times.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 40

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1155

Kudos [?]: 1170 [1], given: 412

Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2017, 05:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
AbdurRakib wrote:
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice


The first main verb (specifies) is in present tense, but the second main verb (did not specify) is in past tense. We should not change the tense unless the meaning of the sentence dictates such a change; in this case, there is no reason to change to past tense, so the correct sentence should maintain the original, non-underlined tense: present. The original sentence also uses the word if to introduce the clause someone who has already… Vice President. If is used to introduce “if-then” type statements, but this statement does not have a “then” counterpart. Rather, this statement is discussing whether one of two things would be true: either someone is still eligible or someone is not still eligible. The correct idiom to introduce this clause is whether.

(C) CORRECT. This choice corrects the original tense error by changing did not specify to does not specify. The choice also corrects the original idiom error by substituting the word whether for the word if.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Kudos [?]: 1170 [1], given: 412

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 319

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 159

Location: India
saurav: suman
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 01:43
AbdurRakib wrote:
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice


Could anybody please explain how the option C is correct as we are using would....................
As i know would verb is used for hypothetical tense
_________________

You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 159

Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7872 [0], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 03:19
Top Contributor
It may be seen that 'would' is not underlined and is used for all the five choices. Should we take, therefore, this question is wrong? Nay.

In addition, this question is not testing conditionality. This is about a dilemma. That is the reason we are using 'whether'.
It is true that conditional clause will not contain either 'will or would' in the subordinate clause.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7872 [0], given: 363

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 319

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 159

Location: India
saurav: suman
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 08:07
daagh wrote:
It may be seen that 'would' is not underlined and is used for all the five choices. Should we take, therefore, this question is wrong? Nay.

In addition, this question is not testing conditionality. This is about a dilemma. That is the reason we are using 'whether'.
It is true that conditional clause will not contain either 'will or would' in the subordinate clause.

Daag sir I got your point somewhat, but could you please explain what is the role of would in this sentence

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 159

Top Contributor
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7872 [1], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 08:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
Top Contributor
'Would' here indicates a subjunctive mood of uncertainty. As of now, it is not clear whether the constitution will accept an application from someone who has already served as President twice. It may accede or deny. As you rightly said, 'would' does denote a hypothetical case, a phenomenon which is as yet a tentative insight, still to be confirmed by canon or custom.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7872 [1], given: 363

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2017, 20:13
C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice
correct choice because of 'that','does',and 'whether'

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 5

Re: While the United States Constitution specifies   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2017, 20:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

While the United States Constitution specifies

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.