GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 10 Dec 2019, 06:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

While the United States Constitution specifies

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 522
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2016, 13:59
1
Top Contributor
27
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:24) correct 30% (01:36) wrong based on 1026 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5192
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 May 2017, 09:04
1
Top Contributor
4
A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice ---- if is wrong; this is not a conditional situation. \ shift of tense to past tense is also wrong

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice------ No conditionals here.

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice -- correct choice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President -- specifying a person may give the wrong meaning that the constitution is trying to specify a specific person. We do need the connector ‘that’ essentially in a reported speech as this.

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice –same as in D plus the wrong use of the conditional.

I do not think there is a great split between the use of twice and two times. Both essentially mean the same; twice is more formal than two-times. Maybe GMAT will like twice rather two times.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509)

Originally posted by daagh on 23 Sep 2016, 23:56.
Last edited by daagh on 13 May 2017, 09:04, edited 1 time in total.
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 May 2016
Posts: 92
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2016, 00:21
confused between B and C
In error analysis of A ....while X states something , it does not state is right use of tense.....

another error is,(experts please correct if I am wrong)
IInd part needs to be a question if someone who has already been seleted, this means that person is still a president
then part hs to be future in this case. would is wrong.
B changes the meaning here by changing IInd part. a person who elected in past (changes the meaning )

C is the answer. please correct me if anything wrong
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 236
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 07:38
mbaprep2016 wrote:
confused between B and C
In error analysis of A ....while X states something , it does not state is right use of tense.....

another error is,(experts please correct if I am wrong)
IInd part needs to be a question if someone who has already been seleted, this means that person is still a president
then part hs to be future in this case. would is wrong.
B changes the meaning here by changing IInd part. a person who elected in past (changes the meaning )

C is the answer. please correct me if anything wrong


The problem with b is not past tense saying he was elected twice would be correct. Use of conditional If is wrong here. Here 'whether' is required to convey the intention of the original sentence.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Posts: 34
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 00:26
Could some one explain why the use of the conditional is wrong ? Would is used in the non-underlined portion of the sentence right ?
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Status: active
Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 126
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 4
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 04:12
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times,it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times,it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice,it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice


for reported speech
that is used and makes more sense
D and E are out

In A and B If condition is not correct as there is no logic if ...then...
whether is used
C is best
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 250
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2017, 02:21
1
daagh wrote:
A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice ---- if is wrong; this is not a conditional situation. \ shift of tense tom past tense is also wrong

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice------ No conditionals here.

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice -- correct choice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President -- specifying a person may give the wrong meaning that the constitution is trying to specify a specific person. We do need the connector ‘that’ essentially in a reported speech as this.

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice –same as in D plus the wrong use of the conditional.

I do not think there is a great split between the use of twice and two times. Both essentially mean the same; twice is more formal than two-times. Maybe GMAT will like twice rather two times.



hi,
DAAGH sir
could you please explain what is difference btw more than twice and more than two times ! and which is more preferred in GMAT

thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: Profile 1
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 59
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2017, 06:30
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice,it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

daagh wrote:
A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice ---- if is wrong; this is not a conditional situation. \ shift of tense tom past tense is also wrong

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice------ No conditionals here.

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice -- correct choice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President -- specifying a person may give the wrong meaning that the constitution is trying to specify a specific person. We do need the connector ‘that’ essentially in a reported speech as this.

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice –same as in D plus the wrong use of the conditional.

I do not think there is a great split between the use of twice and two times. Both essentially mean the same; twice is more formal than two-times. Maybe GMAT will like twice rather two times.
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1347
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2017, 05:22
2
1
AbdurRakib wrote:
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice


The first main verb (specifies) is in present tense, but the second main verb (did not specify) is in past tense. We should not change the tense unless the meaning of the sentence dictates such a change; in this case, there is no reason to change to past tense, so the correct sentence should maintain the original, non-underlined tense: present. The original sentence also uses the word if to introduce the clause someone who has already… Vice President. If is used to introduce “if-then” type statements, but this statement does not have a “then” counterpart. Rather, this statement is discussing whether one of two things would be true: either someone is still eligible or someone is not still eligible. The correct idiom to introduce this clause is whether.

(C) CORRECT. This choice corrects the original tense error by changing did not specify to does not specify. The choice also corrects the original idiom error by substituting the word whether for the word if.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 277
Daboo: Sonu
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 01:43
1
AbdurRakib wrote:
While the United States Constitution specifies that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice would still be eligible to run for Vice President.

A. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it did not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice

B. that a person cannot be elected President more than two times, it does not specify if a former President who was elected twice

C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice

D. a person not to be elected President more than two times, it does not specify whether a twice-elected President

E. a person not to be elected President more than twice, it does not specify if someone who has already been elected President twice


Could anybody please explain how the option C is correct as we are using would....................
As i know would verb is used for hypothetical tense
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5192
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 03:19
Top Contributor
It may be seen that 'would' is not underlined and is used for all the five choices. Should we take, therefore, this question is wrong? Nay.

In addition, this question is not testing conditionality. This is about a dilemma. That is the reason we are using 'whether'.
It is true that conditional clause will not contain either 'will or would' in the subordinate clause.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 277
Daboo: Sonu
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 08:07
1
daagh wrote:
It may be seen that 'would' is not underlined and is used for all the five choices. Should we take, therefore, this question is wrong? Nay.

In addition, this question is not testing conditionality. This is about a dilemma. That is the reason we are using 'whether'.
It is true that conditional clause will not contain either 'will or would' in the subordinate clause.

Daag sir I got your point somewhat, but could you please explain what is the role of would in this sentence

Posted from my mobile device
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5192
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 08:31
1
Top Contributor
'Would' here indicates a subjunctive mood of uncertainty. As of now, it is not clear whether the constitution will accept an application from someone who has already served as President twice. It may accede or deny. As you rightly said, 'would' does denote a hypothetical case, a phenomenon which is as yet a tentative insight, still to be confirmed by canon or custom.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509)
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 243
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2017, 20:13
C. that a person cannot be elected President more than twice, it does not specify whether someone who has already been elected President twice
correct choice because of 'that','does',and 'whether'
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7244
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2019, 07:52
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: While the United States Constitution specifies   [#permalink] 23 Feb 2019, 07:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

While the United States Constitution specifies

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne