Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 03:51 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 03:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,114
Own Kudos:
17,811
 []
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,114
Kudos: 17,811
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Diwakar003
Joined: 02 Aug 2015
Last visit: 04 Jul 2022
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Posts: 123
Kudos: 164
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,114
Kudos: 17,811
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jy295
Joined: 29 Mar 2017
Last visit: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 15
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm getting C. Can someone please check my math and see if there's any error in my logic?

Let's call length and width of the playground as L and W, respectively. We are trying to find (L + 2d)*(W+2d) - (L*W).

Statement 1: 2(L+W) = 100 ==> L+W = 50. Not Sufficient.
Statement 2: 2(L+2d) + 2(W+2d) = 200 ==> 2L + 4d + 2W + 4d = 200 ==> 2(L+W) + 8d = 200. Not Sufficient

Combining Statement 1 and Statement 2: 2(L+W) + 8d = 200 and we know from Statement 1 that 2(L+W) = 100 ==> 100 + 8d = 200 ==> 8d = 100 ==> d = 12.5
Plugging 12.5 back into the original equation, we get (L+25)*(W+25) - (L*W) = ?. Multiplying out the equation, we get (L*W) + 25L + 25W + 625 - (L*W) = ? ==> 25L + 25W + 625.
Simplifies into 25*(L+W) - 625 ==> From statement 1, we know (L+W) = 50, so (25*50) - 625 = 625. Statement 1 + Statement 2 is sufficient
User avatar
sleepynut
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
88
 []
Given Kudos: 905
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Posts: 162
Kudos: 88
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jy295
I'm getting C. Can someone please check my math and see if there's any error in my logic?

Let's call length and width of the playground as L and W, respectively. We are trying to find (L + 2d)*(W+2d) - (L*W).

Statement 1: 2(L+W) = 100 ==> L+W = 50. Not Sufficient.
Statement 2: 2(L+2d) + 2(W+2d) = 200 ==> 2L + 4d + 2W + 4d = 200 ==> 2(L+W) + 8d = 200. Not Sufficient

Combining Statement 1 and Statement 2: 2(L+W) + 8d = 200 and we know from Statement 1 that 2(L+W) = 100 ==> 100 + 8d = 200 ==> 8d = 100 ==> d = 12.5
Plugging 12.5 back into the original equation, we get (L+25)*(W+25) - (L*W) = ?. Multiplying out the equation, we get (L*W) + 25L + 25W + 625 - (L*W) = ? ==> 25L + 25W + 625.
Simplifies into 25*(L+W) - 625 ==> From statement 1, we know (L+W) = 50, so (25*50) - 625 = 625. Statement 1 + Statement 2 is sufficient

Hi Bunuel,
I am with the above poster.Except that his last simplification is wrong.
It should be 25*(L+W) + 625 = 1250+625 = 1875
Thus,together it is SUFFICIENT

Please help clarify
Thanks :-)
avatar
debtanuB
Joined: 22 Feb 2017
Last visit: 09 Oct 2021
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 141
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Location: India
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 29
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MathRevolution
Attachment:
1.png

A larger playground has a rectangular-shaped track shaded shown as above figure such that the track has a uniform d as its width. What is the track’s area?

1) The perimeter of the smaller playground is 100.
2) The perimeter of the larger playground is 200.

I think the correct answer is C.
suppose 'a' be the length & 'b' be the width of the ground. Now as the width of the tract is uniform the the total length of the figure is 'a+2d' & total width is 'b+2d'.
from (1) we have, a+b=100/2=50
from (2) we have, (a+2d+b+2d)=200/2=a+b+4d=100. Hence, we have 4d=50 or, d=50/4.
Now, we have to find net area of the track ,i.e, (a+2d)x(b+2d)-ab=ab+2ad+2bd+4d^2-ab=2d(a+b)+4d^2=2x(50/4)x(50)+4x(50/4)^2=1250+625=1875.
Hence, (1) & (2) are together sufficient.
Bunuel plz correct me if I am wrong.
avatar
dabhishek87
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Last visit: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 62
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think answer should be C.

A and B are clearly not sufficient.
Combing 1 and 2
inner rectangle 2*(l+b) = 100 gives l+b = 50....eq1
outer rectangle 2(l+2d+b+2d) = 200 gives l+b+4d = 100....eq2
using eq1 and eq2
50+4d = 100=>4d = 50=>d=25/2..eq3

now area of shaded portion is (l+2d)*(b+2d) - l*b
gives lb+2ld+2bd+4dd-lb
gives 2d*(l+b) +4 d^2
we know d from eq3 and l+b from eq1, we can get area
User avatar
TheMechanic
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Last visit: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 221
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am getting C as well. :shock: The OA needs to be corrected. :roll:
User avatar
rekhabishop
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 May 2018
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jy295
I'm getting C. Can someone please check my math and see if there's any error in my logic?

Let's call length and width of the playground as L and W, respectively. We are trying to find (L + 2d)*(W+2d) - (L*W).

Statement 1: 2(L+W) = 100 ==> L+W = 50. Not Sufficient.
Statement 2: 2(L+2d) + 2(W+2d) = 200 ==> 2L + 4d + 2W + 4d = 200 ==> 2(L+W) + 8d = 200. Not Sufficient

Combining Statement 1 and Statement 2: 2(L+W) + 8d = 200 and we know from Statement 1 that 2(L+W) = 100 ==> 100 + 8d = 200 ==> 8d = 100 ==> d = 12.5
Plugging 12.5 back into the original equation, we get (L+25)*(W+25) - (L*W) = ?. Multiplying out the equation, we get (L*W) + 25L + 25W + 625 - (L*W) = ? ==> 25L + 25W + 625.
Simplifies into 25*(L+W) - 625 ==> From statement 1, we know (L+W) = 50, so (25*50) - 625 = 625. Statement 1 + Statement 2 is sufficient

Absolutely!
I agree. The OA should be changed to C.
User avatar
Sash143
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Jul 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 62
Kudos: 721
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MathRevolution
==> In the original condition, if you set the width and the height of the playground as a and b, there are 3 variables (a,b,d). In order to match the number of variables to the number of equations, there must be 3 equations. Since there is 1 for con 1) and 1 for con 2), E is most likely to be the answer. By solving con 1) and con 2), from 2(a+b)=100 and 2(a+b)+8d=200, you cannot find a and b in a unique way, hence it is not sufficient.

Therefore, the answer is E.
Answer: E

But I believe we can find d with these two equations -

Please correct me if I m wrong - the area of the shaded region is [assuming the length and width of larger rectangle are L & B resp and those of smaller rectangle are l & b] = LB - lb
and wkt L = l + 2d ---- i ; B = b + 2d ----- ii [since d is uniform]

1) l + b = 50 insuff
2) L + B = 100 insuff

1) + 2)

From 2) we can find d i.e. from i and ii l + 2d + b + 2d = 100

Substituting value of d in LB - lb
------> (l + 2d)(b + 2d) - lb

Simplifying,
2d(l + b) + 4\(d^2\). We know value of d and l + b
Hence sufficient. Option C

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
97881 posts