GMATGuruNY
OA: Warmed by the sun, ocean water evaporates, rises, and condenses.
Here, the four colored actions are presented in a logical sequence.
First, the water is WARMED.
Then, the water EVAPORATES, RISES and CONDENSES.
The implication is that the incipient green action leads to the three subsequent blue actions.
D: The water in the oceans evaporates, warmed by the Sun, rises, and condenses.
Here, the four colored actions are presented OUT OF SEQUENCE, with the incipient red action inserted inexplicably between the first two blue actions.
As a result, the intended meaning -- that the incipient red action leads to the three subsequent blue actions -- is not conveyed.
Since the ordering in D is illogical, eliminate D and choose C.
GMATGuruNYkudos for the nice explanation.
So, can we think of the following happen by the above explanation?
Quote:
OA: Warmed by the sun, ocean water evaporates, rises, and condenses.
1/
Warmed by the sun, ocean water
evaporates2/
Warmed by the sun, ocean water
rises3/
Warmed by the sun, ocean water
condensesQuote:
D: The water in the oceans evaporates, warmed by the Sun, rises, and condenses.
1/
warmed by the Sun, The water in the oceans
evaporates2/ The water in the oceans
rises3/ The water in the oceans
condensesAm I missing anything?
(D) The water in the oceans evaporates (without comma) rises high into the atmosphere, and condenses in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust, which forms clouds.
Two verbs trying to be the verb at a time of one subject! so, that seems wrong. This one is my explanation
This line of reasoning is invalid.
-modifier from D -- we must also remove the comma that directly follows this modifier.
Not so.
Here, if we remove the nonessential modifier in blue, we must retain the comma that follows this modifier, as follows:
Even when the nonessential blue modifier is omitted, the comma immediately before
must be retained.
The resulting structure is not invalid.
.