Here's what was given to us:
The urban planner discusses reasons for the slow adoption of green roofs despite their benefits.
One reason given is the high initial cost of installation. Hence we need to find a second reason that logically completes the argument for why adoption has been slow.Let's look at the options now:
(A) there are sufficient numbers of skilled laborers available to install green roofsAvailability of skilled laborers would actually make adoption easier, not slower. This doesn't fit.
A is out. (B) green roof materials are often sourced from suppliers who are located far from urban centersWhile this might increase costs, it's not a separate reason from the high initial cost already mentioned. Also, it doesn't directly address the comparison with traditional roofing.
Let's hold onto B and see if there's a better choice. (C) tax incentives for green construction projects are commonly available in urban areasTax incentives would encourage adoption, not slow it down. This contradicts the argument and weakens it.
C is out. (D) traditional roofing solutions are generally less expensive and quicker to install than green roofsThis provides a strong alternative to green roofs. It tells us why people might choose traditional roofing instead. Notice how it offers both a cost advantage and a time advantage.
D looks pretty good to me. (E) green roofs typically last longer than traditional roofing materials, thus potentially saving money over timeThis argues favouring green roofs (long-term cost savings), which doesn't explain slow adoption.
E is out. Therefore, the correct answer is (D).