To complete the urban planner's argument logically, we need to identify a reason that explains why the widespread adoption of green roofs has been slow despite their benefits. The argument mentions that the initial cost of installing green roofs is considerably high.
The completion of the argument should therefore focus on another factor that contributes to the slow adoption, possibly related to cost or convenience.Let's analyze each option to see which one best fits:
(A) There are sufficient numbers of skilled laborers available to install green roofs
This does not explain why adoption is slow. In fact, it suggests there is no labor shortage, which would imply that installation should be easier, not harder.
(B) Green roof materials are often sourced from suppliers who are located far from urban centers
This could contribute to the high initial cost and logistical difficulties, but it is not as directly relevant as cost and convenience comparisons.
(C) Tax incentives for green construction projects are commonly available in urban areas
This would likely encourage adoption rather than hinder it. Therefore, it doesn't explain the slow adoption.
(D) Traditional roofing solutions are generally less expensive and quicker to install than green roofs
This option directly addresses the comparison between green roofs and traditional roofs, highlighting that traditional roofs are less expensive and quicker to install. This directly contributes to the reason why the adoption of green roofs has been slow, making it a strong candidate.
(E) Green roofs typically last longer than traditional roofing materials, thus potentially saving money over time
This fact would encourage adoption rather than hinder it, as it suggests long-term savings.
Option (D) provides the most logical and direct completion to the urban planner's argument by explaining the comparative disadvantage of green roofs in terms of cost and installation time, which complements the initial point about high installation costs.So, Answer: D