Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 23:21 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 23:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,815
Own Kudos:
685,179
 [1]
Given Kudos: 88,242
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,815
Kudos: 685,179
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 07 Dec 2024
Posts: 3,503
Own Kudos:
7,088
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert reply
Posts: 3,503
Kudos: 7,088
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
mainbhiankit
User avatar
Fuqua Moderator
Joined: 21 Jul 2021
Last visit: 20 Oct 2023
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
175
 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 232
Kudos: 175
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 8,116
Own Kudos:
4,494
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
Posts: 8,116
Kudos: 4,494
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south. given The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant. same as A

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter. reason : A Japanese noun is pronounced the same way whether it is singular or plural Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant.
is not relevant to argument

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage. same as A

OPTION C is correct


Bunuel
A Japanese noun is pronounced the same way whether it is singular or plural, so to indicate plurality, speakers use number words paired with special endings known as counters. The phrase three fish could be rendered three (small animal)-count fish. Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude. The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional: even whales might be described using the small animal counter, as if saying number animal-count fish.

Which of the following can be most logically inferred on the basis of the information in the passage?


(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south.

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant.

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter.

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant.

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage.

 


This question was provided for
the GMAT Club World Cup Competition

Compete, Get Better, Win prizes and more

 

User avatar
NextGenNerd
Joined: 09 Jun 2021
Last visit: 28 Jan 2023
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Correct answer: Choice C

This is an inference question. So the answer should be 100% true

(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south. - Wrong- Does not have to be 100% true

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant.
- Wrong- Does not have to be 100% true

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter. - Correct answer.
The statements in the argument say: without counters, it will be ungrammatical and may be considered rude. Also, the noun is the same irrespective of singular or plural. hence I think, the meaning can definitely be grasped

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant. - Wrong- The argument says "MAY" be met with disapproval not 100%

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage. - Wrong- Does not have to be 100% true
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,422
Own Kudos:
4,594
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,422
Kudos: 4,594
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Japanese noun is pronounced the same way whether it is singular or plural, so to indicate plurality, speakers use number words paired with special endings known as counters. The phrase three fish could be rendered three (small animal)-count fish. Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude. The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional: even whales might be described using the small animal counter, as if saying number animal-count fish.

Which of the following can be most logically inferred on the basis of the information in the passage?


Quote:
(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south.
The statement contradicts " However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional"
Incorrect

Quote:
(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant.
The statement contradicts the sentence " The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use."
Incorrect

Quote:
(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter.
Even if there may be many counter counters for the same thing, a Japanese persons would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase since it is stated in the argument, "The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional"
Correct

Quote:
(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant.
A non-native speaker may have trouble understanding and using a counter but it can not be concluded that he would be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant. He may use body language instead.
Incorrect

Quote:
(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage.
A major city having inhabitants from across the World, will have more variations in usage of the counters than a smaller city
Incorrect

IMO C
avatar
soudipsengupta
Joined: 17 Sep 2020
Last visit: 15 Nov 2022
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
132
 [1]
Given Kudos: 222
Posts: 61
Kudos: 132
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A Japanese noun is pronounced the same way whether it is singular or plural, so to indicate plurality, speakers use number words paired with special endings known as counters. The phrase three fish could be rendered three (small animal)-count fish. Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude. The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional: even whales might be described using the small animal counter, as if saying number animal-count fish.

Which of the following can be most logically inferred on the basis of the information in the passage?


(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south.

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant.

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter.

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant.

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage.

 


This question was provided for
the GMAT Club World Cup Competition

Compete, Get Better, Win prizes and more

 


Inference question; one of the following must logically follow from the above statements.

(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south.
INCORRECT: This cannot be inferred from the given statements.

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant.
INCORRECT: This may be true but not must be true

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter.
CORRECT: This logically follows from the statements. From the statements: "Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude. The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional.." we see that although without the counters the phrase is considered ungrammatical and perceived as rude but for it to be rude, it may very well be understandable.

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant.
INCORRECT This may be true but not must be true

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage.
INCORRECT Again this may be true but not must be true.
User avatar
rxb266
Joined: 30 Nov 2018
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 138
Own Kudos:
152
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GPA: 4
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Japanese noun is pronounced the same way whether it is singular or plural, so to indicate plurality, speakers use number words paired with special endings known as counters. The phrase three fish could be rendered three (small animal)-count fish. Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude. The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional: even whales might be described using the small animal counter, as if saying number animal-count fish.

Which of the following can be most logically inferred on the basis of the information in the passage?


(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south. (This may or may not be the case and in way it is supported by the set of facts in the argument !) INCORRECT

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant. (It is too specific and in now way supported by the argument) INCORRECT

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter. Seems legit !! The choice use the word <<probably>> and not a certainty indicator <<will>>. Without the counter a phrase may be considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude but a person (Japanese) may probably grasp the meaning. Contender!!

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant. (The argument is in now way talking about the non native speakers.) INCORRECT

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage. (The passage does talks about regional dialects. But we can not go too broad to compare the regional variation of a city with that of a smaller city.) INCORRECT

IMO Option C
User avatar
VelvetThunder
Joined: 14 Jun 2020
Last visit: 30 Apr 2023
Posts: 74
Own Kudos:
130
 [1]
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 74
Kudos: 130
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A Japanese noun is pronounced the same way whether it is singular or plural, so to indicate plurality, speakers use number words paired with special endings known as counters. The phrase three fish could be rendered three (small animal)-count fish. Without these counters, a phrase is considered grammatically unsound and may be perceived as rude. The regional dialect, age, or even occupation of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. However, many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional: even whales might be described using the small animal counter, as if saying number animal-count fish.

Which of the following can be most logically inferred on the basis of the information in the passage?


(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south.

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant.

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter.

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant.

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage.

 


This question was provided for
the GMAT Club World Cup Competition

Compete, Get Better, Win prizes and more

 



ANSWER C

(A) A person from Hokkaido, the most northerly of the main islands of Japan, would have trouble understanding someone from Okinawa, located over a thousand miles to the south. Not necessarily. many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional

(B) Few elderly speakers would use the same counter as younger speakers to refer to an animal such as an elephant. Age of the speaker may dictate which counter to use. So incorrect

(C) A Japanese person would probably grasp the meaning of a phrase with or without a counter, even if that person would use a different counter. CORRECT. Could be true. many speakers across the country apply certain counters more broadly than is traditional

(D) A non-native speaker who did not know to use a counter would likely be met with disapproval when placing an order for two fish skewers at a restaurant. Not necessarily. It may be perceived as rude

(E) A major city such as Tokyo, with tens of millions of inhabitants, would be less likely than a smaller city to see regional variations in counter usage. Variance in usage is not mentioned in the passage
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts