Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:53 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:53
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   5   
605-655 Level|   Clauses|                     
User avatar
blitzkriegxX
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2018
Last visit: 28 May 2019
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
247
 [8]
Given Kudos: 329
Location: Bouvet Island
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V30
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V31
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 490 Q39 V18
GPA: 4
GMAT 4: 490 Q39 V18
Posts: 94
Kudos: 247
 [8]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine Updated on: 22 Dec 2018, 00:18
Originally posted by blitzkriegxX on 13 Oct 2018, 07:36.
Last edited by blitzkriegxX on 22 Dec 2018, 00:18, edited 1 time in total.
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sriramsundaram91
Can some one tell me why Option D is wrong. IMO, I don't see anything wrong with D.
Show more

Hey sriramsundaram91,
Lets look at option D.

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still

1. "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity,..."
Do u think "there was" is necessary here?
We could simply start with "less than 1 percent..."
Also, think about WTF is "there was" doing in my sentence?

Fineee.. I get it! You are not convinced with that explanation. Let me throw another error at you!

2. Verb-ing modifier - "having lighting that was still..."
But before we jump into this one you should know what it is briefly.

Verb-ing modifiers do two things usually
- Gives us some extra information or the result aspect of the preceding clause when followed by a comma.
- Gives us extra information about the preceding NOUN if there is NO comma.

So now that we kind of know what verb-ing modifiers are, lets find the damn error!
We know that COMMA + having modifies the ENTIRE preceding clause.
The subject of "having lighting that was still.." MUST BE the SUBJECT of the PRECEEDING CLAUSE.
Logically "having lighting that was still..." should modify the subject "homes" to make any sense.
But because we have "there", it is pretty confusing and illogically modifies "there" instead of "homes".


I will try to explain with a simple example on verb-ing modifiers -

Amy skipped school, giving the excuse of stomach ace.
Who is doing the action of skipping school? The subject -Robert
Who is doing the action of giving excuses? The subject again - Robert

But in option D we have the wrong subject. Hence it is wrong.

Let me know if u have any more doubts. (or if u find anything wrong with the explanation)
Hope it helped you. :)
User avatar
saurabh9gupta
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Last visit: 28 Jul 2023
Posts: 264
Own Kudos:
177
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kenan-Flagler '24 (D)
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Kenan-Flagler '24 (D)
GRE 1: Q163 V155
Posts: 264
Kudos: 177
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 24 Feb 2019, 00:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been

daagh sir - need some help in this one

I eliminated CDE because "Where" has to modify a place but in CDE it modifies electricity which is not a place.

I am having trouble in eliminating B.. could you please guide?
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [2]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 24 Feb 2019, 00:40
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suarabh

Quote:
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.
Show more


(B)

Look at B from parallelism point of view. On the left of 'and' you have a passive voice IC with electricity as the subject and was as the verb. However on the right of 'and. You have only a phrase with a subject' lighting and a participle 'provided'. The verb auxiliary verb 'was' is missing. Hence, this combination is not parallel and is a fragment.

If B were "electricity was in less than one percent of homes, lighting still provided mainly by candles or gas", then that might have been ok.( I mean without the 'and')


Therefore, if a modifier appears after 'and', Pl. check for symmetrical parallelism immediately. In 90% of the cases, you find only a fragment in GMAT.

HTH!
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,175
 [13]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,175
 [13]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 16 Apr 2019, 12:45
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow it down to the right choice quickly! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences in orange:

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been

While there are a lot of things we could focus on, there are 2 major ones that jump out:

1. was/had been/had
2. was still/still/was still being/was still/had still been

Since both of these deal with verbs, let's start our focus there. If we look at the entire sentence, we can gather clues as to which verb tense we'll need to use:

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

The events go in a certain order, which requires certain verb tenses:

Public spaces install electric lighting --> electricity is in less than 1 percent of homes + lighting is still done by candles and gas

The earliest event (public spaces install electric lighting) needs to use past perfect "had installed," which it does. The other two events happen later, AND AT THE SAME TIME, so they both need to use past tense. They should also be written using parallel structure. Let's see which options handle this correctly, and eliminate the ones that don't:

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided --> OK
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still provided --> WRONG (needs to have the verb "was" in front of "provided" to work.)
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being provided --> WRONG
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided --> OK
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been provided --> WRONG

We can eliminate options B, C, & E because they use the wrong verb formats or don't use parallel structure. Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's take a closer look at each option with the non-underlined part attached and look for problems:

(A) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is CORRECT! By starting the modifier with the word "where," it modifies the noun directly before it, which is homes. This makes perfect sense! It also uses the proper verb tenses throughout to indicate the correct order of events.

(D) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is INCORRECT because it includes an -ing modifier that's being used incorrectly. The -ing modifier must modify the main subject and verb of the previous clause, and in this case it's trying to modify the phrase "there was." It SHOULD modify the word "homes," but it would need to be reworded into a different type of modifier for that to work.


There you have it - option A was correct all along!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
User avatar
priyanshu14
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2017
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 74
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 71
Location: India
Schools: IIMC MBAEx'23
Schools: IIMC MBAEx'23
Posts: 74
Kudos: 13
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 19 Jun 2019, 05:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow it down to the right choice quickly! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences in orange:

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been

While there are a lot of things we could focus on, there are 2 major ones that jump out:

1. was/had been/had
2. was still/still/was still being/was still/had still been

Since both of these deal with verbs, let's start our focus there. If we look at the entire sentence, we can gather clues as to which verb tense we'll need to use:

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

The events go in a certain order, which requires certain verb tenses:

Public spaces install electric lighting --> electricity is in less than 1 percent of homes + lighting is still done by candles and gas

The earliest event (public spaces install electric lighting) needs to use past perfect "had installed," which it does. The other two events happen later, AND AT THE SAME TIME, so they both need to use past tense. They should also be written using parallel structure. Let's see which options handle this correctly, and eliminate the ones that don't:

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided --> OK
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still provided --> WRONG (needs to have the verb "was" in front of "provided" to work.)
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being provided --> WRONG
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided --> OK
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been provided --> WRONG

We can eliminate options B, C, & E because they use the wrong verb formats or don't use parallel structure. Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's take a closer look at each option with the non-underlined part attached and look for problems:

(A) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is CORRECT! By starting the modifier with the word "where," it modifies the noun directly before it, which is homes. This makes perfect sense! It also uses the proper verb tenses throughout to indicate the correct order of events.

(D) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is INCORRECT because it includes an -ing modifier that's being used incorrectly. The -ing modifier must modify the main subject and verb of the previous clause, and in this case it's trying to modify the phrase "there was." It SHOULD modify the word "homes," but it would need to be reworded into a different type of modifier for that to work.


There you have it - option A was correct all along!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Show more

Dear @EMPOWERgmatVerbal ,

Thanks for detailed explanation. I am confused in option D with your explanation:

[/quote] (D) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is INCORRECT because it includes an -ing modifier that's being used incorrectly. The -ing modifier must modify the main subject and verb of the previous clause, and in this case it's trying to modify the phrase "there was." It SHOULD modify the word "homes," but it would need to be reworded into a different type of modifier for that to work. [/quote]

As per your explanation verb+ing "having" is modifying "there was" which according to me is wrong. having is modifying the complete clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity" which is correct.
According to me, Option D is wrong because:
1. The clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity" is incorrect. Instead of "was", it should be "were" since the subject is "1 percent of homes".
2. "That" is wrong.
2A: In the clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity", it should be those since 1% of homes are plural.
2B: In the clause "having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas", it should be "other homes".

I will also request egmat to confirm my understanding.

Thanks in advance
bb generis GMATNinja egmat
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,175
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,175
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 20 Jun 2019, 11:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
priyanshu14
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow it down to the right choice quickly! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences in orange:

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been

While there are a lot of things we could focus on, there are 2 major ones that jump out:

1. was/had been/had
2. was still/still/was still being/was still/had still been

Since both of these deal with verbs, let's start our focus there. If we look at the entire sentence, we can gather clues as to which verb tense we'll need to use:

In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

The events go in a certain order, which requires certain verb tenses:

Public spaces install electric lighting --> electricity is in less than 1 percent of homes + lighting is still done by candles and gas

The earliest event (public spaces install electric lighting) needs to use past perfect "had installed," which it does. The other two events happen later, AND AT THE SAME TIME, so they both need to use past tense. They should also be written using parallel structure. Let's see which options handle this correctly, and eliminate the ones that don't:

(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided --> OK
(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still provided --> WRONG (needs to have the verb "was" in front of "provided" to work.)
(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being provided --> WRONG
(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided --> OK
(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been provided --> WRONG

We can eliminate options B, C, & E because they use the wrong verb formats or don't use parallel structure. Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's take a closer look at each option with the non-underlined part attached and look for problems:

(A) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is CORRECT! By starting the modifier with the word "where," it modifies the noun directly before it, which is homes. This makes perfect sense! It also uses the proper verb tenses throughout to indicate the correct order of events.

(D) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is INCORRECT because it includes an -ing modifier that's being used incorrectly. The -ing modifier must modify the main subject and verb of the previous clause, and in this case it's trying to modify the phrase "there was." It SHOULD modify the word "homes," but it would need to be reworded into a different type of modifier for that to work.


There you have it - option A was correct all along!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.

Dear @EMPOWERgmatVerbal ,

Thanks for detailed explanation. I am confused in option D with your explanation:

Show more
(D) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is INCORRECT because it includes an -ing modifier that's being used incorrectly. The -ing modifier must modify the main subject and verb of the previous clause, and in this case it's trying to modify the phrase "there was." It SHOULD modify the word "homes," but it would need to be reworded into a different type of modifier for that to work. [/quote]

As per your explanation verb+ing "having" is modifying "there was" which according to me is wrong. having is modifying the complete clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity" which is correct.
According to me, Option D is wrong because:
1. The clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity" is incorrect. Instead of "was", it should be "were" since the subject is "1 percent of homes".
2. "That" is wrong.
2A: In the clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity", it should be those since 1% of homes are plural.
2B: In the clause "having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas", it should be "other homes".

I will also request egmat to confirm my understanding.

Thanks in advance
bb generis GMATNinja egmat[/quote]

Hello @priyanshu14!

Let's tackle your concerns, one at a time, and figure out where the miscommunication happened!

(D) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas.

This is INCORRECT because it includes an -ing modifier that's being used incorrectly. The -ing modifier must modify the main subject and verb of the previous clause, and in this case it's trying to modify the phrase "there was." It SHOULD modify the word "homes," but it would need to be reworded into a different type of modifier for that to work. [/quote]

As per your explanation verb+ing "having" is modifying "there was" which according to me is wrong. having is modifying the complete clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity" which is correct.

You are correct to say that an -ing modifier can sometimes modify an entire clause. However, the way this modifier is worded makes it confusing as to what it's referring back to. It's not that it's grammatically wrong - it's just not how the GMAT prefers we handle modifiers. They prefer that modifiers are as clear as possible. Option A rewrites the modifier to make it clearer that it's referring back to just "homes," rather than the entire phrase.

Now let's tackle your other issues:

According to me, Option D is wrong because:
1. The clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity" is incorrect. Instead of "was", it should be "were" since the subject is "1 percent of homes".

I'll agree with you on that one! Option A fixes this by moving the singular subject "electricity" before the verb.

2. "That" is wrong.

This is actually okay as it is. You couldn't change it to "which" because that would create a "modifier inside a modifier" situation, which wouldn't make a lot of sense to readers.

2A: In the clause "there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity", it should be those since 1% of homes are plural.

What are you replacing with "those" here? I don't see anywhere you could put "those" and it would work.

2B: In the clause "having lighting that was still provided mainly by candles or gas", it should be "other homes".

Again, I'm not sure where you would put "other homes" here?? I don't see where that would work.

I hope this helps! Also, if you want, please clarify what you mean by 2A & 2B on your list so I can better help you clear those up.
avatar
Abhishekrao12
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2024
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 52
Kudos: 65
 [1]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 27 Nov 2019, 20:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C. there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being ---1. still being provided changes the meaning. 2. Where is wrongly referring to electricity

According to the above solution, where is wrongly referring to electricity.
with is a preposition and with electricity is modifying the word homes. Can 'where' not refer to homes instead of electricity as who does in the example.

Ex : The committee chose Mr. Smith of Left Block, who was the most experienced member, to lead all the management-related operations.

who refers to Mr. Smith and not left block.

Can you please answer daagh ?
User avatar
Tamalmallick13
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Last visit: 16 May 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 20
Kudos: 3
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 30 Nov 2019, 09:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Grammar may solve most of this problem

A. electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still – the best since where refers to a place namely homes.

B. electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still --- Forthrightly unparallel with a clause in on side of ‘and’ but only a phrase at the other side.

C. there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being ---1. still being provided changes the meaning. 2. Where is wrongly referring to electricity

D. there was less than one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still --- was less than one percent of homes—SV number problem

E. less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been --- doesn’t make much sense
Show more

In the answer choice a), there is no bonafide verb in the independent clause introduced by but. Can you explain how it is correct?
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 30 Nov 2019, 09:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
was is as bonafide as a verb can get:).
User avatar
Tamalmallick13
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Last visit: 16 May 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 20
Kudos: 3
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 30 Nov 2019, 10:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
was is as bonafide as a verb can get:).
Show more

It seemed 'was' was used as an auxiliary verb and there is a requirement of the main verb. With the main verb, the sentence will look like "electricity was supplied in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still".

Would you explain, how without the main verb it was a complete sentence?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [3]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [3]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 30 Nov 2019, 15:26
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tamalmallick13 "Was" is not being used as an auxiliary verb here. We have "Electricity was X, where lighting was Y." Both X and Y are modifiers: X= in <1% of homes; Y = provided by candles/gas. "Was" is the main verb in that first part, just as it would be if we said "I was in the pool" or "I was out of town." We might have expected another word, such as "electricity was provided to < 1% of homes," but notice that even in that case, "provided" is NOT a verb. The electricity didn't provide anything, nor did the lighting in the later clause. "Provided" in that case would be serving as a modifier, and "was" would still be the only verb.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 30 Nov 2019, 23:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tamalmallick13

It seemed 'was' was used as an auxiliary verb and there is a requirement of the main verb. With the main verb, the sentence will look like "electricity was supplied in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still".

Would you explain, how without the main verb it was a complete sentence?
Show more
Hi Tamal, main verb is the verb of the independent clause.

For example:

Jack is smart.
- Above sentence is an independent clause. Auxiliary verb is is the main verb.

Peter sleeps.
- Above sentence is an independent clause. Action verb sleeps is the main verb.

On the other hand, in the following sentence:

Peter is a person who lives life on his own terms.
- lives is an action verb, but is not the main verb, because lives is the verb of the Dependent clause who lives life on his own terms. In the above sentence, is is the main verb because it is the verb of the Independent clause Peter is a person.

In other words, main verb can either be an action verb or an auxiliary verb.

Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Independent/Dependent clauses, their application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
jkrishh7
User avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2020
Last visit: 16 Sep 2020
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
21
Given Kudos: 18
Status:When going gets tough, tough gets going_GMAT2020
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
WE:Engineering (Military & Defense)
Posts: 37
Kudos: 21
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 24 Apr 2020, 23:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="yavasani"]In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.


(A) electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still

(B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still (helping verb (was) missing)

(C) there had been less than 1 percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being (there is confusing and had also)

(D) there was less than 1 percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still (there is confusing)

(E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been (use of had twice in a sentence)
User avatar
kornn
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
93
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 24 May 2020, 21:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear GMATGuruNY AjiteshArun MartyTargetTestPrep IanStewart DmitryFarber,

I'm just curious why is "less than one percent of homes" correct?

LESS should be used with uncountable nouns.
However, "one percent of homeS" are clearly countable.

Some expert replied earlier but I'm still confused.
avatar
TheUltimateWinner
avatar
Schools: Harvard '24 Judge '23 LBS '24 McCombs '24 Mendoza Tepper '24 Ross '24 Cox Marshall '24 Fisher Kelley '24 Jones McDonough '24 Owen '24 Terry BU Simon '24 Katz GWU Mason Babson Gabelli Foster '24 Goizueta '24 Scheller Stern '23 CBS '23 Booth '23 Haas '25 Wharton '25 Stanford '26 Johnson'23 Fuqua '23 Kellogg '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 INSEAD Aug 22 intake Olin '23 Said '23 Sloan '23 Carey Arizona "22 Yale '23 UC Davis Madison '23 Anderson '23 Carroll Carlson '23 Darden '23
Posts: 2,489
Kudos: 2,387
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 25 May 2020, 05:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Suarabh

Quote:
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops, and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas.


(B)

Look at B from parallelism point of view. On the left of 'and' you have a passive voice IC with electricity as the subject and was as the verb. However on the right of 'and. You have only a phrase with a subject' lighting and a participle 'provided'. The verb auxiliary verb 'was' is missing. Hence, this combination is not parallel and is a fragment.

If B were "electricity was in less than one percent of homes, lighting still provided mainly by candles or gas", then that might have been ok.( I mean without the 'and')


Therefore, if a modifier appears after 'and', Pl. check for symmetrical parallelism immediately. In 90% of the cases, you find only a fragment in GMAT.

HTH!
Show more
daagh
passive voice? i did not find any passive voice here! Could you share why do you consider it as passive voice, please?
If B were "electricity was in less than one percent of homes, lighting still provided mainly by candles or gas", then that might have been ok-->so do you think that 'lighting......' is considered as 'adverbial modifier' here?
Thanks__
avatar
TheUltimateWinner
avatar
Schools: Harvard '24 Judge '23 LBS '24 McCombs '24 Mendoza Tepper '24 Ross '24 Cox Marshall '24 Fisher Kelley '24 Jones McDonough '24 Owen '24 Terry BU Simon '24 Katz GWU Mason Babson Gabelli Foster '24 Goizueta '24 Scheller Stern '23 CBS '23 Booth '23 Haas '25 Wharton '25 Stanford '26 Johnson'23 Fuqua '23 Kellogg '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 INSEAD Aug 22 intake Olin '23 Said '23 Sloan '23 Carey Arizona "22 Yale '23 UC Davis Madison '23 Anderson '23 Carroll Carlson '23 Darden '23
Posts: 2,489
Kudos: 2,387
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 25 May 2020, 06:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Tamalmallick13 "Was" is not being used as an auxiliary verb here. We have "Electricity was X, where lighting was Y." Both X and Y are modifiers: X= in <1% of homes; Y = provided by candles/gas. "Was" is the main verb in that first part, just as it would be if we said "I was in the pool" or "I was out of town." We might have expected another word, such as "electricity was provided to < 1% of homes," but notice that even in that case, "provided" is NOT a verb. The electricity didn't provide anything, nor did the lighting in the later clause. "Provided" in that case would be serving as a modifier, and "was" would still be the only verb.
Show more
"electricity was provided to < 1% of homes,"--->it seems that 'provided' is a 'verb'. The verb 'provided' has been used as 'passive', isn't it?
The electricity didn't provide anything--->the electricity did not provide anything in the context. it's ok. But, apart from this context, 'provided' could be verb if we use it as passive voice.
The electricity was provided by the government to the local people.
^ in this example, 'provided' is verb. Am I missing anything in your writing?
Thanks__
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,985
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,985
 [5]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 25 May 2020, 06:35
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn

I'm just curious why is "less than one percent of homes" correct?

LESS should be used with uncountable nouns.
However, "one percent of homeS" are clearly countable.
Show more

It's always fine to use "less" with a percentage, and only sometimes fine to use "fewer" (only when the quantity is countable). English is flexible on that point. "On the test, less than ten percent of the questions were about geometry" is perfectly good English, and it's much more common to use "less" in this context than to use "fewer".

Asad

passive voice? i did not find any passive voice here! Could you share why do you consider it as passive voice, please?
Show more

I agree that, strictly speaking, the phrase "electricity was in less than one percent of homes" is not passive, though it is close. If it instead said "electricity was installed in less than one percent of homes", that's a passive construction, since it doesn't mention who did the installing. I don't see that it's important to consider passive and active construction in this question though; answer B is wrong because it includes a sentence fragment after "and", and not because of passive voice. Indeed the correct answer here uses passive voice, at the end of the sentence: "lighting was provided by candles" is passive ("candles provided lighting" would be the active version).

There is a long reply above that also incorrectly rules out answer B solely because "was" and "provided" are allegedly not 'parallel'. There's nothing inherently wrong with using "was... and provided..." in a list. There is no parallelism issue in the sentence "I was talking on the phone when I provided my credit card details." It is because "provided" is being used in a passive sense here that the word "was" is required.
User avatar
kornn
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
93
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 27 May 2020, 23:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart

It's always fine to use "less" with a percentage, and only sometimes fine to use "fewer" (only when the quantity is countable). English is flexible on that point. "On the test, less than ten percent of the questions were about geometry" is perfectly good English, and it's much more common to use "less" in this context than to use "fewer".
Show more
Dear IanStewart,

If LESS is fine with a percentage, then how could you eliminate choice A. in the below question?
I think one-quarter = 25%.
Quote:
When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950's, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.


(A) there are less than one-quarter that many

(B) there are fewer than one-quarter as many

(C) there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount

(D) the number is less than one-quarter the amount

(E) it is less than one-quarter of that amount
Show more
Here OA is B.
Is your decision point between A. and B. is "THAT many" vs. "AS many"?
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,985
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,985
 [3]
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 28 May 2020, 05:25
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn


Dear IanStewart,

If LESS is fine with a percentage, then how could you eliminate choice A. in the below question?
I think one-quarter = 25%.

Is your decision point between A. and B. is "THAT many" vs. "AS many"?
Show more

If you read the discussion here:

https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2014 ... -less.html

you'll see that among New York Times editors (the authors of that article are NYT editors, as is the person whose contrary opinion is discussed), the question of whether to use "less" or "fewer" with fractions and percentages is controversial, but that many American style guides and dictionaries favour "less". Yes, it is the correct use of "as" to construct a comparison that makes B the better answer in the question you ask about.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nine 28 May 2020, 23:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's odd that folks are discussing less vs. fewer on percents/fractions without discussing what we have percents/fractions OF. We can have less land, but fewer drive-ins. We'd have less food, but fewer cookies. This is a simple matter of singular vs. plural.
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts