Last visit was: 17 Jul 2024, 06:46 It is currently 17 Jul 2024, 06:46
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1426
Own Kudos [?]: 4600 [47]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3596
Own Kudos [?]: 5466 [4]
Given Kudos: 346
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 277
Own Kudos [?]: 378 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 277
Own Kudos [?]: 378 [0]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
abhimahna wrote:
I donot agree with the fist statement given in option D, but I can get D as the answer by POE.

Let me explain how:

It says depositors are relieved from financial collapse because top executives have been buying shares in their own bank.

Now, it says depositors are saying top executives have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, thus being worried is of no use.

But the author concluded that you are overoptimistic because blah blah...

Now, I can very well say 2nd is Author's main conclusion. And first is the premise used by depositors to come to their own conclusion.

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies. --> 2nd is not a counter evidence. It is the main conclusion. Hence, incorrect.

B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence. --> 2nd is the main conclusion of the author.

C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion. --> Same as A.

D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. --> Here, I got 2nd statement correct. I donot agree with 1st boldface here. But since I have rejected all other options, I am left with only D as the answer.

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion. --> Actually, the conclusion made by author is opposite to what depositors concluded.

I agree with you, the first BF is a premise supporting the intermediate conclusion i.e. these rumours are crap.
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 556
Own Kudos [?]: 953 [0]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.6
WE:Operations (Consumer Products)
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
egmat bb chetan2u

How can the first part be the intermediate conclusion ? As it is the sum of the reasoning. Please share your thoughts

Posted from my mobile device
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11474
Own Kudos [?]: 34396 [1]
Given Kudos: 322
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
1
Kudos
egmat bb chetan2u

How can the first part be the intermediate conclusion ? As it is the sum of the reasoning. Please share your thoughts

Posted from my mobile device

Hi .

The second portion is of course the main conclusion and that is the only reason why answer can be D...

BUT the first portion is not an intermediate conclusion. Intermediate conclusion is actually just after that bold face - those worrisome rumours must be false
The first is a premise supporting the intermediate conclusion.

Does not seem to be OG question. They will never error in this way.

Poor quality. Dump it.
Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [0]
Given Kudos: 63
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V40
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
This is a poor quality question. I don't agree that D's second half is main conclusion.
This passage seems to have 2 opinion from authors.
a) those worrisome rumors must be false.
b) They might well be overoptimistic

For my understanding intermediate conclusion leads to Main conclusion but these seem to be two possible explanations for a scenario.

1st half of D is completely wrong as also mentioned by Chetan above.
Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2017
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [0]
Given Kudos: 107
Location: United Arab Emirates
Schools: Owen '22
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
Can someone confirm this is a GMATPREP question? Given the dubious wording of the answer choice, if this is not a GMATPREP question, can the tag be removed?
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Posts: 830
Own Kudos [?]: 789 [0]
Given Kudos: 1576
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
Can we change the bold parts to the following to make the question correct?

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

BF1: those worrisome rumors must be false = Intermediate conclusion
BF2: They might well be overoptimistic = Main conclusion

Then at least D would be correct.
D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 976
Own Kudos [?]: 187 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have [#permalink]
Kurtosis wrote:
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
Second half is not an counterevidence bur rather the main conclusion therfore out

B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.
The second half is no intermediate conclusion it's the main one therefore out

C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
The second half actually supports the intermediate conclusion , out

D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
This is exactly the meaning conveyed by the boldfaced therefore let us hang on to it

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
The second half isn't supported by the first half therefore out

THerefore IMO D
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 731
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Re: Since it has become known that several of a banks top executives have [#permalink]
However, I got a D as an answer by the process of elimination. But there is a slight problem with option D.

The second boldface is the main conclusion - correct. And the only option that states that
The first boldface is a premise used to support the intermediate conclusion i.e. those worrisome rumors must be false. Saying the entire first boldface as the intermediate conclusion is a bit of a problem.

Maybe an issue while posting the question or an issue with the source.
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2023
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 272 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Re: Since it has become known that several of a banks top executives have [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Kurtosis wrote:
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.

B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.

C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.

D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.

Similar Question

Hi Bunuel bb

Please check whether this is a GMATPREP question.

As per the comments above and also according to me, Option D's first part is not correct.

If it is not an official question then we can remove the GMATPREP tag
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2021
Posts: 227
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [0]
Given Kudos: 781
Location: India
Schools: Ross '26 (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Re: Since it has become known that several of a banks top executives have [#permalink]
Can any experts weigh in on why B is incorrect and D is correct? Also how is the second BF the main conclusion of the argument? I thought the main conclusion would be "those worrisome rumors are true" .
Is it necessary for main conclusion to be explicitly written in the stem?

GMATNinja KarishmaB
Re: Since it has become known that several of a banks top executives have [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts