GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Oct 2018, 22:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Reviews Badge
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2017, 07:29
3
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (01:31) correct 39% (01:34) wrong based on 429 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying ever since that the two will reappear.

A. was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying
B. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
C. had been frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and by the clown, and has been worrying
D. has been frightened by the clown and the by grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
E. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 140
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, International Business
Schools: ISB '19, Fox"19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3
  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2017, 07:38
C out - past perfect construction
D out as its a useless passive construction..half of the sentence is in passive voice ..the other half in active voice..D a big NO
So we have A B and E
A the child was froghtened ...and was worrying...violation of parallelism rule

B and E are similar except the present perfect construction in the second part of the sentence..
If we go by the meaning present perfect makes more sense and since is used in the second part..
We generally use present perfect with since and within..
So E

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 639
Location: India
Schools: Rotman '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2017, 11:43
gauravraos wrote:
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying ever since that the two will reappear.

A. was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying
B. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
C. had been frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and by the clown, and has been worrying
D. has been frightened by the clown and the by grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
E. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried


We need present perfect in the 2nd part of sentence ....
C and E is the only choice ..But past perfect is not correct in C ..So E...
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2017, 00:12
1
Top Contributor
My doubts:

1. It is clear that the clown and the grifter are two separate entities. But E seems to say that both are one and the same since the choice is not using the preposition 'by' for the second factor namely 'the grifter'.

If the modifier ---who had a number of unsettling mannerisms--- refers to the grifter alone, the normal expression here would be: "was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and by the clown and has been worried.

I think that E has a word - order problem.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 260
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2017, 11:35
sobby wrote:
gauravraos wrote:
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying ever since that the two will reappear.

A. was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying
B. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
C. had been frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and by the clown, and has been worrying
D. has been frightened by the clown and the by grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
E. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried


We need present perfect in the 2nd part of sentence ....
C and E is the only choice ..But past perfect is not correct in C ..So E...

D also has Present Perfect. Frightened and Worried are parallel to each other.

D. has been frightened by the clown and the by grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried...

gauravraos wrote:
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying ever since that the two will reappear.

A. was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying We need Present Perfect here

B. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried frightened & worried are parallel to each other implying a construction similar to option A.

C. had been frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and by the clown, and has been worrying We need another event in the past to use Past Perfect.

D. has been frightened by the clown and the by grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried If we ignore the change in order of words the by the word has changes the meaning. <Frightened> was an event in the past and hence we should use past tense for it.

E. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried



Though I also have an issue with this construction.

The child was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms...

In this sentence, Relative Clause starting with Who seems to modify both The Clown and The Grifter.
_________________

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts

Please hit Kudos If my Solution helps

My Debrief for 750 - https://gmatclub.com/forum/from-720-to-750-one-of-the-most-difficult-pleatues-to-overcome-246420.html

My CR notes - https://gmatclub.com/forum/patterns-in-cr-questions-243450.html

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1314
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2017, 08:17
2
gauravraos wrote:
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying ever since that the two will reappear.

A. was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and the clown, and was worrying
B. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
C. had been frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and by the clown, and has been worrying
D. has been frightened by the clown and the by grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and worried
E. was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


This question has a fair amount going on, but really it's all about tense.

The timeline of the child's "worrying" in the initial version (A) is self-contradictory. "Was worrying" is past continuous, suggesting an action that had a duration but that is no longer ongoing in the present. But "ever since" suggests the opposite -- that the child continues to worry. Since this timeline makes no sense, we can eliminate A.
B cleans up some arguable style issues from A, but ultimately B does nothing to correct the contradictory tense issue associated with "the child was... worried ever since" (this might also be read as "the child... worried ever since," but the same issue would remain).

C repairs the end of the sentence by using the present perfect continuous "has been worrying" to describe a process ongoing from the past into the present. However, C adds the past perfect "had been frightened" at the beginning, which wrecks this aspect of the timeline. The past perfect describes a past tense event that occurred before another past tense event in the sentence, but the only other past tense event here is "had a number of unsettling mannerisms," and this presumably was true at the time when the grifter and the clown frightened the child (note that "had a number of unsettling mannerisms" is simple past, not past perfect; the "had" in this context is a verb meaning "possessed," rather than a perfect tense helping verb).

D attempts to solve the "worried ever since" problem by adding the present perfect helping verb "has" at the beginning of the sentence. This does, in fact, allow the latter part of the sentence to pick up the helping "has" and make sense. However, the unintended consequence is that the child's initially being frightened is also ongoing into the present. This is illogical especially given that the unsettling mannerisms are expressed in the simple past ("had") and given that the phrase "ever since" implies a definite point strictly in the past at which the child's worry began.

E corrects the tense issue at the end of the sentence by providing the present perfect "has been worried." In the process, it correctly retains the simple past tenses elsewhere in the sentence. Therefore E is the correct answer.

Some students may get hung up on the logic of locating the relative clause "who had a number of unsettling mannerisms." Does it refer to the grifter alone or to both the grifter and the clown? Does its meaning change when the clown is moved around the sentence in answers B, D, and E? Is it even unambiguous when placed after the compound phrase "the clown and the grifter"?

In A and C, only the grifter had unsettling mannerisms. Ultimately, answers B, D, and E change the meaning to state that both the clown and the grifter had unsettling mannerisms. When a pronoun ("who") follows a list, the pronoun will unambiguously refer to the entire preceding list if possible. This does, of course, change the meaning of the sentence, but that isn't problematic. The only rule of meaning that matters to the GMAT is whether the meaning in question is logical, not whether the meaning is the same as it was in the original sentence. And it isn't illogical for either the clown, the grifter, or both to have unsettling mannerisms.

Since every answer choice is both logical and unambiguous with regard to the owner of the unsettling mannerisms, this was a false decision point designed to distract from the fundamental tense issues that only E was able to fully solve.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2017, 10:43
1
Top Contributor
The OA is debatable. The unsettling mannerism is the characteristic of the grifter as per the original but choice E says that it is the characteristic of both the grifter and clown. Clowns are more of jesters with pranks rather than confidence tricksters. I think it is more sensible to think the original text way rather than as in E. Of course, the tense form is better in E with the use the present perfect to tally with its marker ' ever since'.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 18
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2017, 08:51
daagh wrote:
The OA is debatable. The unsettling mannerism is the characteristic of the grifter as per the original but choice E says that it is the characteristic of both the grifter and clown. Clowns are more of jesters with pranks rather than confidence tricksters. I think it is more sensible to think the original text way rather than as in E. Of course, the tense form is better in E with the use the present perfect to tally with its marker ' ever since'.



"The child was frightened by the clown and the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried ever since that the two will reappear."


I think the author is trying to use an elliptical construction, omitting the second "by" in...


"The child was frightened by the clown and by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried ever since that the two will reappear."
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2017, 09:19
Top Contributor
The point is who or what does the phrase ' who had unsettling mesmerisms' modify. If it is only modifying the grifter, then the correct way is the original way where the grifter is mentioned first along with its modifier, but the clown is simply stated barely. E is faulting on that .
An OG example of this point can be seen in the following topic
https://gmatclub.com/forum/published-in ... 49209.html
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 18
The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2017, 12:43
daagh wrote:
The point is who or what does the phrase ' who had unsettling mesmerisms' modify. If it is only modifying the grifter, then the correct way is the original way where the grifter is mentioned first along with its modifier, but the clown is simply stated barely. E is faulting on that .
An OG example of this point can be seen in the following topic
https://gmatclub.com/forum/published-in ... 49209.html


"The child was frightened by the clown and by the grifter, who had a number of unsettling mannerisms, and has been worried ever since that the two will reappear."



This sentence is correct because the relative clause "who had a number of unsettling mannerisms" modifies the noun immediately preceding the comma.



I agree with you that answer choice E, as written, is confusing because one could view the "clown and grifter" as a compound object. Ellipses should really only be used conservatively and when they don't cause confusion.

Just my opinion. I'm not claiming to be Ernest Hemingway.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 45
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: Healthcare, International Business
Schools: Queen's MBA'20
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.19
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2018, 06:49
ever since that the two will re appear - indicate use of present perfect tense . therefore has been in E is rightly used
ans E
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin &nbs [#permalink] 03 Apr 2018, 06:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The child was frightened by the grifter, who had a number of unsettlin

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.