While industry insiders insist that fish farming takes a burden off

Question

While industry insiders insist that fish farming takes a burden off wild fish stocks, outside experts have suggested that actually the farms  do more harm than help, by increasing the spread of diseases, of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems .

(A) do more harm than help, by increasing the spread of diseases, of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

(B) do more harm than they help, by increasing the spread of diseases, the spread of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

(C) harm rather than help, increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

(D) are harming rather than helping, increase both the spread of diseases and parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

(E) are harming rather than helping, increase both the spread of diseases, parasites such as sea lice, and, astronomically, the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

Source: TTP Beta Testing

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Nope.

The funny thing is that A is, with a few minor edits, pretty much straight of an article on fish. So the writer of the article also thought A to be correct.

kassim · Answer

Unfortunately, I went with A as well,

D & E: Are harming as the action is going on now. Wrong.

B: Eliminated from the reasons, "do more harm than  they  help" 
 "increasing the spread of diseases, the spread of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing" Not parallel.

Got lost between A & C

rajpalwindersmvdu · Answer

What's the final answer

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Look at the following in the original version.

the farms  do more harm than help

Also, what about this?

by increasing the spread of diseases, parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

Compare it with the following. What's different?

increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

Also, C is written to look wrong in isolation. So reading it in the context of the entire sentence is helpful.

While industry insiders insist that fish farming takes a burden off wild fish stocks, outside experts have suggested that actually the farms harm rather than help, increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems.

aishwarya4391 · Answer

Ans :- The right answer set justifies the 2 sets of parallelism being tested in the given question
Points to note :-

Parallelism markers :-  rather than   ;  and ,  than 
In the original text of the question, its important to note that the elements compared in the "-- and --" phrase are not parallel - "by increasing the spread of diseases, parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems"
Issue:- "by increasing the spread of" can be repeated across parasites but cannot be used with astronomically increasing the level of pollution.

Option C corrects the error. Also   harm rather than help   is parallel

sobby · Answer

Selected correct answer on llism...
 MartyMurray  --just want to know apart from llism , can we delete D and E because of subjunctive mood(suggested....)..

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

That question is interesting, and the answer is no.

"experts have suggested that" in this context is not part of a command type sentence.

"experts have suggested that" in this context means something along the lines of "experts have indicated that" or "experts have offered for consideration the idea that".

So "that" does not have to be followed by the subjunctive. Rather "that" begins a noun clause, which is the object of "have suggested". The following is therefore fine as it is.

Experts have suggested   that the farms are harming rather than helping.

sobby · Answer

Thanks Marty for pointing out ..hoping GMAC will test this concept at 750 level questions... :p :

RMD007 · Answer

Options other than C are wrong in couple of ways.

A. do more harm than help, by increasing the spread of diseases, parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems
speed of diseases compared with parasites

B. do more harm than they help, by increasing the spread of diseases, the spread of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystem.

A & B -->by is not required here as "comma + ing" modifier already modifies the clause before comma.

C. harm rather than help, increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

D. are harming rather than helping, increase both the spread of diseases and parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

E. are harming rather than helping, increase both the spread of diseases, parasites such as sea lice, and, astronomically, the level of pollution in wild ecosystem

D & E --> To whom are they harming or helping??

daagh · Answer

C. harm rather than help, increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

For a discussion on C, the OA, how many factors are there in the modifying clause "increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems"? In other words, is "the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice" one factor or two factors? If there are two factors, the modifying clause is a three-factor list and you don't require the 'and' between one and two. On the contrary, if both the factors are nested one into one, then you will not require the comma after lice since, in a two-factor list, a comma is not used. What is the OE, please?

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

The first two factors are nested into one.

I thought the comma before "and astronomically" to be optional. So I added put a comma there for clarity.

Will edit it out. The feedback is much appreciated.

Nightmare007 · Answer

The final answer is C for me.
after ', ' 'by' is redundant .
B/w A and C (only parallel options) C is better than A

GMATisLovE · Answer

Although I agree with C being the best answer, but it changes the meaning conveyed by the original sentence.  "harm rather than help"  do not mean the same as  "more harm than help" .

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

The idea that the correct answer to a Sentence Correction question has to convey the meaning conveyed by the original version is a myth.

The correct answer is simply the answer that has no, or at least the fewest or least egregious, errors and issues.

Consider the following. If the original is flawed, it may convey a nonsensical meaning. Clearly then, there is no reason to expect that the correct answer will always convey the meaning conveyed by the original.

Johnsonfuckthegmat · Answer

1) "do more harm than help" is not parallel here.
We say "do harm to" or "do good to", here harm and good are nouns. 
But we never say " do help to" ( unless when you want to make an emphasis) , 
so the more parallel structure here should be " do more harm than good".

to sum up, when using the structure of "do more X than Y", both "do X" and "do Y'' should be able to work alone. So, A and B are out.

2) the meaning and structure: 
According to outside experts, the farms do two things:
-----first) they do harm rather than help
-----second) they increase the spread of some bad things.
These two are definitely not unrelated: The second one tells us how they harm. 
So the best way to convey this is to make"harm" the main verb and to make " increase......" a modifier, just as option C does.

Besides, one sentence can not have two main verbs without a conjunction
say: " X is doing..., do......." 
this structure is not OK. Thus, D and E are out

not a native English speaker, so plz correct my analysis if it is wrong : )

gmatexam439 · Answer

While industry insiders insist that fish farming takes a burden off wild fish stocks, outside experts have suggested that actually the farms  do more harm than help, by increasing the spread of diseases, of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems .

A. do more harm than help,  by   increasing the spread of  diseases, of  parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems - 1. There should be a "and" in place of the comma 2. by is wrongly used

B. do more harm than  they help,  by increasing the spread of  diseases, the spread of parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems - 1. they is wrongly used 2. by is wrongly used 3. There should be a "and" in place of the comma

C. harm rather than help, increasing the spread of diseases and that of parasites such as sea lice and astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems - Correct

D. are harming rather than helping,  increase both the spread of diseases and parasites such as sea lice, and astronomically  increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems - Not a parallel structure

E. are harming rather than helping, increase both the spread of  diseases, parasites  such as sea lice, and, astronomically, the level of pollution in wild ecosystems -  1. There should be a "and" in place of the comma

abhi2707 · Answer

OA is between A and C

A: 
1. 'do more harm than good' is a standard English phrase. 'do more harm than help' in the given context looks ok. Pl correct me.
2. by Verb1-ing.......and Verb2-ing is setting the parallelism
3. spreading of disease,  (Is ellipsis applicable here?)  of parasites such as XYZ. 
4. 'spreading of disease, of parasites such as XYZ' : The example XYZ may be trouble creator. As disease seems to have been compared with parasites....a common example (XYZ) has been shared

C: Sets the tone perfectly.

I chose A because it seemed like a concise version of C.

Pl clarify

Thanks

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

"Do more harm than help" does not make sense.

"Do harm" is idiomatically correct. "Do good" is idiomatically correct. However, "do help" is not, at least not in this context.

Since the "do" in "do more harm than help" is understood to work with not only "harm" but also "help," we have "do help," which in this context is not idiomatically correct and does not make sense.

(A) is a trap choice. It seems to be logical, and sounds parallel, but is actually illogical.

Here's what the list in (A) is essentially:

by increasing x, y, and increasing z

Notice, "increasing" appears in the first and last elements of the list but not in the second. So, the list does not make sense, as it says, essentially, by increasing x, by y, and by increasing z, or

by  increasing the spread of diseases,  by  of parasites such as sea lice, and  by  astronomically increasing the level of pollution in wild ecosystems

dcummins · Answer

Am I correct in saying that in (A) and (B) ", by increasing " shouldn't be separated by a comma. The correct construction should be to attach "increasing..." onto the previous clause by itself, so "increasing" clearly modifies "harm"?

marty could you please clarify this and other reasons why (B) may be incorrect?

marty  could you please clarify this and other reasons why (B) may be incorrect?

While industry insiders insist that fish farming takes a burden off

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

While industry insiders insist that fish farming takes a burden off

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards