Last visit was: 17 May 2026, 20:17 It is currently 17 May 2026, 20:17
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
605-655 (Medium)|   Weaken|               
avatar
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 01 Dec 2018, 17:10
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
could someone explain me why c is an strengthener? i was between C and D and my reasoning was the following:

C- if natives could easily replace manatee´s meat with seafood but they haven´t, the may hunt it because of a bond with that specific meat, so that even a good income will not make them to stop hunting.

D- I was really tempted, but then it though that the manatee´s survival could be unrelated with it´s habitat.
User avatar
dave13
User avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 15 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,082
Own Kudos:
1,140
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,082
Kudos: 1,140
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 11 Dec 2018, 08:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?

Endangered Animals are being hunted. The locals offered the hunter alernative income. Hunters would use boats and take tourists there. tourists are highly interested in seeing these animals. What is the main concern ? This plan wont be succssful

(A) Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees. In the argument it is is clearly mentioned " Tourist interest is high" hence out of scope.

(B) Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again. ( we are not concerned with recovery of species) out of scope.

(C) In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea. ( we are not concerned with replacement of meat. out of scope)

(D) There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees. ( not concerned with number of hunters)

(E) To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.

correct E option implies that this plan wont work. because hunters would have to use even larger boats to take tourists to fragile habitat.
User avatar
dave13
User avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 15 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,082
Own Kudos:
1,140
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,082
Kudos: 1,140
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 11 Dec 2018, 08:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikellaverde
could someone explain me why c is an strengthener? i was between C and D and my reasoning was the following:

C- if natives could easily replace manatee´s meat with seafood but they haven´t, the may hunt it because of a bond with that specific meat, so that even a good income will not make them to stop hunting.

D- I was really tempted, but then it though that the manatee´s survival could be unrelated with it´s habitat.
Show more

mikellaverde

C is out of scope, nowhere is mentioned replacement of meat. The main idea is hunters would use boats to take tourists to those areas. so you need to weaken that part of argument that is relevant to main idea.

D is out of scope as well. nowhere is mentioned number of hunters. Who cares how many hunters are available.

refer to my post above. hope it helps :)
avatar
TheUltimateWinner
avatar
Schools: Harvard '24 Judge '23 LBS '24 McCombs '24 Mendoza Tepper '24 Ross '24 Cox Marshall '24 Fisher Kelley '24 Jones McDonough '24 Owen '24 Terry BU Simon '24 Katz GWU Mason Babson Gabelli Foster '24 Goizueta '24 Scheller Stern '23 CBS '23 Booth '23 Haas '25 Wharton '25 Stanford '26 Johnson'23 Fuqua '23 Kellogg '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 INSEAD Aug 22 intake Olin '23 Said '23 Sloan '23 Carey Arizona "22 Yale '23 UC Davis Madison '23 Anderson '23 Carroll Carlson '23 Darden '23
Posts: 2,465
Kudos: 2,470
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 12 Dec 2018, 13:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?

(A) Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.

(B) Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.

(C) In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.

(D) There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.

(E) To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.
Show more

Hi MartyMurray,
I'm trying to figure out whole thing of this CR, but I'm fail to find out the following things.

Q1: What is/are the plan(s) here?
Q2: How E is the correct choice? Could you explain elaborately, please?
Thanks__
User avatar
blitzkriegxX
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2018
Last visit: 28 May 2019
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
255
Given Kudos: 329
Location: Bouvet Island
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V30
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V31
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 490 Q39 V18
GPA: 4
GMAT 4: 490 Q39 V18
Posts: 89
Kudos: 255
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 20 Jan 2019, 02:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AsadAbu

Hi MartyMurray,
I'm trying to figure out whole thing of this CR, but I'm fail to find out the following things.

Q1: What is/are the plan(s) here?
Q2: How E is the correct choice? Could you explain elaborately, please?
Thanks__
Show more

Hey AsadAbu!
Hope you dont mind me pitching in!

Quote:
Q1: What is/are the plan(s) here?
Show more
    - In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat.
    - The hunters have an expert knowledge about these mammals and their habitat. Keeping this in mind, the conservationists plan isto convince the hunters to take tourists on boat rides to show the tourists these manatees (since the hunters already know well about the manatees and their habitat).
    - Tourist interest to see the manatees is high.
    - The plan's goal :
    a) Give hunters a good income
    b) Help the manatees survival.

Quote:
Q2: How E is the correct choice? Could you explain elaborately, please?
Show more
Notice the words "fragile" , "many more trips" in option E.
So by having to switch to big boats and having do many more of these trips to the manatees fragile habitat, they are essentially ruining or damaging the habitat. This weakens the argument.


Extra on Option A -

Remember that many = 3,4,5,6.. to ALL!
And also we have a nice premise saying "tourist interest is high".
So "many" might be 3 or 4 or 5.... or ALL.
Here since we have that nice premise, It is best to avoid this option by assuming that "many" means something not very high.

Hope this helps! :)
User avatar
TarunTilokani
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 25 Jul 2020
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
199
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Posts: 50
Kudos: 199
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 06 Jun 2019, 10:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We are told by the author that the manatee is an endangered species which continues to be hunted for its meat. To help preserve this animal, the plan is to convert the hunters into tourist guides who could guide the tourists, who are already highly interested in viewing the manatees, to the habitats of the manatees. This will help achieve the twin goals of protecting the manatees as well as ensuring a steady source of income for the former hunters. We need to find something that will counter the desirable goals of the plan.

1)We are already told in the passage that ‘tourist interest is high’. So this will clearly contradict the information in the passage.

2)This may end up strengthening the argument.

3)Even if the local people could replace manatee meat with other sources, there is nothing to suggest that they will be making this substitution.

4)Even if there is a shortage of manatee hunters, the authorities can always hire other people as guides.

5)CORRECT - If the guides have to make many more trips to the manatee habitats, which are already fragile, then the trips might put the manatees into further danger. Secondly, since the hunters have to use far larger boats, it may not be an economical deal for them to leave their current occupation of hunting and become tourist guides.

TAKEAWAY: IN CR ARGUMENTS THE FACTS CAN'T BE CHALLENGED. This is a classic argument in which most people end up marking answer choice A. The Author has already mentioned in the argument that the tourist interest is high..
User avatar
BooRadley
User avatar
Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Last visit: 23 May 2021
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
143
Given Kudos: 64
Location: India
Posts: 58
Kudos: 143
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 18 Mar 2020, 01:43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ron Purewal's super helpful reply on MGMAT forum:

we're looking to WEAKEN THE CONCLUSION.

the CONCLUSION is
"the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival"

therefore, we can WEAKEN THE CONCLUSION by showing either
* that the plan will NOT give the hunters a good income, or
* that the plan will act to ENDANGER the manatees' survival.

--

the correct answer should be (e).
if the hunters would have to "would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do", then the manatees' survival is being placed at increased risk. note especially the pointed use of the adjective "fragile".

(a) is irrelevant.
it doesn't matter that MANY tourists are uninterested and/or unwilling to pay for the tours, since the passage has already guaranteed us that "tourist interest is high".
MANY just means that we can find a bunch of tourists who aren't interested. this doesn't, at all, weaken the conclusion that tourist interest is high.
analogy:
if i determine that, in some area, local interest in eating cheeseburgers is high, then i should probably open a burger joint (if there isn't already one open) in that area. if i find "many" people in the area that don't eat cheeseburgers, that doesn't impact my existing statement that local interest in eating the burgers is high - again, we don't need everyone to be on board.
User avatar
avigutman
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,285
Own Kudos:
916
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,285
Kudos: 916
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 13 Oct 2021, 14:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
roch1991
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2021
Last visit: 02 Mar 2023
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 7
Kudos: 3
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 14 Dec 2021, 22:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?

(A) Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.

(B) Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.

(C) In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.

(D) There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.

(E) To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.
Show more


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The controversy of Option A and why Option E is correct



Let us assume there are 10000 tourists and 8000 don't care about the manatees, 1000 are undecided, like 'yeah, whatever man!!' and the remaining 1000 are really interested. The author says that the interest of these 1000 people is high enough for his the plan to proceed. He doesn't care about the rest for his plan and we shouldn't too.

So we don't care about the people who are not interested. The premise says that the interest is high and this is a fact. Don't try and question the premise. So Option A is not controversial or 'breaking the premise' as some in the discussion are suggesting ; Option A is more 'out of scope or irrelevant' as far as this question is concerned as the sample space we are concerned about are the people who are interested in the manatees in the first place.

In weakening questions we should rather be trying to weaken the conclusion that the author draws from these facts or premises using new information if available.

So in this question it is given that tourist interest is high and the author concludes that his plan will achieve twin goals. Look for statements which might suggest that these twin goals might not get achieved.

Option E captures the essence beautifully. It makes us question whether the hunters can really get good income when they need to make large initial investments in buying larger boats just to maintain their current income and whether manatee's survival can be ensured when more trips are being made to their 'fragile' environment !!
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 703
Own Kudos:
214
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 703
Kudos: 214
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 25 Nov 2023, 21:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding the argument -
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Fact
Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Plan to "take tourists on boat rides to see manatees."
Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival. - Conclusion. Two goals: "giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival."

Option Elimination -

(A) Some tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees. - "Some" can be at least 2 or 2%. Ok. So, say 98% are still interested. The conclusion is still valid. Distortion.

(B) Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again. - Scope of our argument is to weaken the plan's success - what plan? Hunters take tourists. For what? To earn more and also save Manatees. So this option says, "Recovery would enable some hunting." Does this hypothetical is linked to our scope? No. Out of scope.

(C) In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea. - at best, a strengthener.

(D) There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees. - Even better. The supply of hunters is less, and demand is more. They can make good money, which is the objective. At best, a strengthener.

(E) To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do. - First, even to make the current income (we aren't talking about more), they need bigger boats and, even then, to make more trips, which eventually impacts the fragile habitat of manatees, thus further harming them. So, the Manatees get harmed even if they make more trips in the future; the tourists may not see manatees, which eventually means future business loss. It's a loss-loss scenario. Weakener, we need.
User avatar
VasundharaS
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2020
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
GPA: 8.07
Posts: 28
Kudos: 6
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 21 May 2025, 06:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For D - doesnt it mean that mantae hunters arent enough because not that many people are willing to be former hunters and thus hunting will continue too?

@ChrisLele
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
70,924
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,924
 [1]
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 27 May 2025, 09:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VasundharaS
For D - doesnt it mean that mantae hunters arent enough because not that many people are willing to be former hunters and thus hunting will continue too?
Show more
(D) just means that the demand for boat rides would exceed the supply (not enough guides to fill demand).

If supply exceeded demand, that would be a cause for concern. In that case, we'd expect some hunters to remain hunters because there's a lack of demand for their services as guides. But as long as supply exceeds demand, there's nothing stopping the hunters from switching jobs (from hunting to guiding). From that perspective, (D) would actually be evidence that the plan will succeed.

To your point, one possible interpretation of (D) is that the hunters don't want to switch jobs, but that isn't something we can assume. In short, (D) might cast doubt on the plan, but it's more likely that it's evidence that the plan will succeed.

Choice (E) is a better bet. It gives us a specific flaw in the plan, without leaving any room for interpretation: the boat rides would be harmful to the manatees’ fragile habitat, and that could very well negate the positive effect of switching from hunting to guiding.
User avatar
Phoenixboy
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2025
Last visit: 23 Mar 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, h 04 Jan 2026, 09:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise 1: The manatees are endangered marine mammal in parts of Caribbean.


Premise 2: The manatees have long been hunted for its meat.


Premise 3: Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees (PLAN).


Premise 4: Tourist interest is high.


Premise 5: So the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.


(A) Some tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees. (The action of ‘some’ is not compelling to cast doubt on the success of the plan. Moreover, this statement is counter to the premise provided in the stimulus. Out of scope/ Irrelevant - ELIMINATE)


(B) Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again. (This suggest that the plan will be atleast partially successful. Opposite answer/ Strengthener- ELIMINATE)


(C) In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea. (This provides one reasons why the plan may work out. Opposite answer/ Strengthener- ELIMINATE)


(D) There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees. (This provides one reasons why the plan may work out. The logical consequence of this statement is that there will be plenty of work for the hunters. Opposite answer/ Strengthener- ELIMINATE)

(E) To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do. (This option provides a reason casting doubt on the success of the proposed plan. If manatee hunter’s who switch to guiding tourist will have to use far larger boats and make many more trip, than they currently do, gives plausible reason why the plan will not reach its goal. Note: In making the plan, the author assumes that the plan is full proof and airtight– that is there is no variable that the author has failed to consider in the construction of the plan, that would, if true, ruin/hurt the plan.)



alimad
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?

(A) Some tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.

(B) Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.

(C) In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.

(D) There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.

(E) To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.


Show SpoilerOld version of option A
(A) Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.

Every tricky question should trigger a follow up quiz. Build that habit with GMAT Club Forum Quiz →.
Show more
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
AbhishekP220108
575 posts
bhanu29
368 posts