TheUltimateWinner
Thanks Mr. Abhishek, I thought so like you but the issue is here...
if the example is:
To drink without me blah blah blah would .....^^ It seems that ''to drink'' is the subject but my brain still not convinced to announce ''to drink'' as a subject! If the sentence is something like below then it could make sense to me..
To drink something without me blah blah blah would .....^^ In this example, ''to drink something'' could be the subject. Am I missing anything, here?
Hello
TheUltimateWinner,
Thank you for the follow-up. Please allow me to chime in.
I personally feel that longer sentences broaden the scope of confusion. I rather like to take simpler, smaller sentences to understand the underlying principle behind any usage.
So let's do the same. The most simple and very common sentence to look at it is:
To err is human. I am sure there is no doubt in your mind about the subject in this sentence. So, the principle gets established here that a "to verb" phrase CAN certainly be used as a subject.
Your concern is more regarding the detail, not really the principle. What I mean is that "To drink" is a legit phrase that can act as a subject. Now, it is really a matter of adding detail if you want to add "something" after this phrase to provide specific details. Moreover, it is the nature of the word "drink" also in this context that may require specifications. But this is all detail. The principle again is that a "to verb" phrase can act as a subject. Therefore, Choice B does have a subject.
Let's analyze
Choice B purely from the Subject-Verb-Object perspective. It says:
To proceed without the presence of a definite plan for upcoming labor negotiations would surely have proven disastrous in the face of the skilled and resolute opposition.Basically, the choice says that "To proceed without a plan would have proven disastrous". So, this version does have the subject.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha