Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
60% (01:29) correct
40%
(01:39)
wrong
based on 8402
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Partly as a result of Proposition 13, which severely limits property tax increases, California has come more and more to rely on personal income taxes for its revenues; income taxes have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002.
A) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
SC00150.02
A) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
SC00150.02
29 Apr 2020, 09:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
abhish27
Hi abhish27, whenever we are talking about a specific time (1962 and 2002 in this case), simple past tense (increased) should be used; not present perfect tense (have increased).
You can watch our video on Present Perfect Tense and also our video on Simple Past Tense
p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Simple Past and Present perfect tense, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
22 Jul 2020, 13:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello Everyone!
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
Partly as a result of Proposition 13, which severely limits property tax increases, California has come more and more to rely on personal income taxes for its revenues; income taxes have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002.
A) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
After a quick glance over the options, there are 2 key differences we can focus on:
1. have increased / increased (Verb Form)
2. to 48 percent / to being up to 48 percent / were up to 48 percent / were 48 percent (Idioms)
Since #1 on our list is an easy either/or split, let’s start there! No matter which one we choose, we’ll eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly. This is a matter of choosing the correct verb form for the sentence’s intended meaning:
have increased = the increase started in the past, and it is continuing to increase today
increased = the increase started in the past, and it stopped increasing at some later point in the past
Since the sentence is talking about an increase that occurred between 1962-2002, we need to choose the verb form that best conveys that:
A) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
We can eliminate options A, B, & C because the verb “have increased” doesn’t convey the intended meaning. Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let’s tackle #2 on our list. This is an idiom issue. The idiom we’re using here is “from X to Y.” Let’s see how our options handle this idiom:
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
This is INCORRECT because it doesn’t follow the “from X to Y” idiom structure.
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
This is CORRECT! It uses a clear verb form and idiom structure!
There you have it - option E is our winner! By focusing on the either/or split first, we were able to eliminate several options, leaving us plenty of time to focus on more complex issues!
Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
Partly as a result of Proposition 13, which severely limits property tax increases, California has come more and more to rely on personal income taxes for its revenues; income taxes have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002.
A) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
After a quick glance over the options, there are 2 key differences we can focus on:
1. have increased / increased (Verb Form)
2. to 48 percent / to being up to 48 percent / were up to 48 percent / were 48 percent (Idioms)
Since #1 on our list is an easy either/or split, let’s start there! No matter which one we choose, we’ll eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly. This is a matter of choosing the correct verb form for the sentence’s intended meaning:
have increased = the increase started in the past, and it is continuing to increase today
increased = the increase started in the past, and it stopped increasing at some later point in the past
Since the sentence is talking about an increase that occurred between 1962-2002, we need to choose the verb form that best conveys that:
A) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C) have increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
We can eliminate options A, B, & C because the verb “have increased” doesn’t convey the intended meaning. Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let’s tackle #2 on our list. This is an idiom issue. The idiom we’re using here is “from X to Y.” Let’s see how our options handle this idiom:
D) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
This is INCORRECT because it doesn’t follow the “from X to Y” idiom structure.
E) increased from 18 percent of the state's general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
This is CORRECT! It uses a clear verb form and idiom structure!
There you have it - option E is our winner! By focusing on the either/or split first, we were able to eliminate several options, leaving us plenty of time to focus on more complex issues!
Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
