p = (0,100] i.e. it is a positive value that is more than 0 but less than 100. So, 100 units = distance between 0 (not inclusive) and 100 (inclusive).
If we were to be pedantic and divide p in 100 units, then shouldn't the 1st unit = (0,1] i.e. the distance between 0 (not inclusive) and 1 (inclusive) is 1 unit, while the 2nd unit = (1,2] and so on, the 100th unit = (99,100].
So, if p = (3,4) then isn't the distance between 3 (not inclusive) and 4 (not inclusive) < 1 unit? For it to be 1 unit, either of 3 or 4 needs to be inclusive.
Let's say distance between (3,4) is 1 unit. Then, the distance between (0,1) = 1 unit = (1,2) = ..... = (99,100). In all these cases the positive integers aren't considered, so 100 integers are missing in the total 100 units. Won't that mean that either our definition of 1 unit is wrong, or we need to increase the denominator by some value as 100 units doesn't include all possible outcomes of p (positive integers are missing).
Bunuel
MissionAdmit
Between 3.1 and 3.99 there are 99 units not 100. P does not include value of extremities 3 and 4. Can you please help me understand this
Where do 3.1 and 3.99 come from? Why 3.1? Why not 3.0000001 or 3.000000000000000000000000001? Anyway, it's as simple as this, the distance between 3 and 4 is 1 unit and the distance between 0 and 100 is 100 units, so P = 1/100.