Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:43 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
JaydeepPatadiya
Joined: 14 Nov 2022
Last visit: 23 Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [3]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Although some had accused Smith, the firm’s network manager, of negligence when the crucial data went missing, the CEO defused a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault.

A. a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
B. a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
C. a situation, which was quite tense, by stating publicly that Smith was not responsible for the debacle
D. a quite tense situation with a public statement about the debacle not being Smith’s fault
E. a quite tense situation by publicly stating the debacle not to have been Smith’s fault
GMATGuruNY
Sir, A very quick question. Normally, we use COMMA+VerbING as adverbial modifier but in choice B we use some extra words (i.e., by publicly). Why don't we use as usual like '',stating publicly that the debacle was not Smith’s fault''?
Thank you for your time..
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,795
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,795
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
Quote:
Although some had accused Smith, the firm’s network manager, of negligence when the crucial data went missing, the CEO defused a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault.

A. a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
B. a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
C. a situation, which was quite tense, by stating publicly that Smith was not responsible for the debacle
D. a quite tense situation with a public statement about the debacle not being Smith’s fault
E. a quite tense situation by publicly stating the debacle not to have been Smith’s fault
GMATGuruNY
Sir, A very quick question. Normally, we use COMMA+VerbING as adverbial modifier but in choice B we use some extra words (i.e., by publicly). Why don't we use as usual like '',stating publicly that the debacle was not Smith’s fault''?
Thank you for your time..

One possible reason:

As mentioned in my first post, by + VERBing cannot serve to modify a state-of-being such as was or were.

COMMA + VERBing, however, is not constrained in this way.
SC30 in the OG12:
Shields were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows.
Here, COMMA + protecting refers to were and to the subject of this verb -- shields -- conveying that the SHIELDS were PROTECTING warriors.

Your proposed revision:
a situation that was quite tense, stating publicly that the debacle was not Smith's fault
Here, COMMA + stating seems to refer to was and to the implied subject of this verb -- a situation -- conveying that a SITUATION was STATING publicly that the debacle was not Smith's fault.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
TheUltimateWinner
Quote:
Although some had accused Smith, the firm’s network manager, of negligence when the crucial data went missing, the CEO defused a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault.

A. a situation that was quite tense with her public statement that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
B. a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
C. a situation, which was quite tense, by stating publicly that Smith was not responsible for the debacle
D. a quite tense situation with a public statement about the debacle not being Smith’s fault
E. a quite tense situation by publicly stating the debacle not to have been Smith’s fault
GMATGuruNY
Sir, A very quick question. Normally, we use COMMA+VerbING as adverbial modifier but in choice B we use some extra words (i.e., by publicly). Why don't we use as usual like '',stating publicly that the debacle was not Smith’s fault''?
Thank you for your time..

One possible reason:

As mentioned in my first post, by + VERBing cannot serve to modify a state-of-being such as was or were.

COMMA + VERBing, however, is not constrained in this way.
SC30 in the OG12:
Shields were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows.
Here, COMMA + protecting refers to were and to the subject of this verb -- shields -- conveying that the SHIELDS were PROTECTING warriors.

Your proposed revision:
a situation that was quite tense, stating publicly that the debacle was not Smith's fault
Here, COMMA + stating seems to refer to was and to the implied subject of this verb -- a situation -- conveying that a SITUATION was STATING publicly that the debacle was not Smith's fault.
This meaning is nonsensical.
GMATGuruNY
Your explanation is awesome as usual. Thanks again with kudos, sir.
User avatar
JaydeepPatadiya
Joined: 14 Nov 2022
Last visit: 23 Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
3
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
JaydeepPatadiya
alicebling
Can someone please explain why a comma is needed in front of "by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault." Is it stil correct if the comma is removed?? Thank you!

I also have some what similar query. After comma "by publically stating that....." is an independent clause. I rejected this schoice because two independent clauses can not be connected by comma. I'd appreciate if experts can help here to understand why my reasoaning is incorrect.

Happy to help you with this.

Although some had accused Smith, the firm’s network manager, of negligence when the crucial data went missing, the CEO defused a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault.

1. The first takeaway is that the words "by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault" do not form an Independent Clause. This is just a prepositional phrase:
    Preposition: by
    Complete Object of Preposition: publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
    Main Object of Preposition "by": stating (verb-ing noun a.k.a. a gerund)

So, "by publicly stating something" is just a prepositional phrase in which:
    something = that the debacle was not Smith's fault

In order to improve your ability to distinguish between phrases and clauses, I strongly recommend you strengthen your basics of grammar and work on deriving the Sentence Structure of complex sentences.

2. Now, let's come to the question of the comma placed before this prepositional phrase "by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault".
This prepositional phrase modifies the verb "defused", telling us "how" the situation was defused. Now, the comma has been placed before 'by' only to make it clear that this prepositional phrase modifies 'defused' and nothing else in between.

This is normally done when the preceding object is especially long. The comma signifies the end of that object and the start of the next part of speech, in this case an adverb. This eliminates any possible ambiguity or unintended modification.


So, although this comma is not absolutely necessary here, it certainly makes the sentence more comprehensible.


I hope this helps improve your understanding of adverbial prepositional phrases.


Happy Learning.

Abhishek

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I considered "by publically stating..." as clause only because it has subject and verb pair but now I realize that its the part of entire object. Appreciate your time for the explanation. I am very happy after improving this aspect:-)
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal, GMATNinja karishma

Can you please explain the application of V-A-N rule in the answer choices?
User avatar
anshgupta_2
Joined: 26 Apr 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 209
Posts: 21
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
Would love it if an expert took a stab at all the options AndrewN GMATNinja egmat

Is 'a quite tense situation' necessarily wrong compared to 'a situation that was quite tense'?

Thanks in advance
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
jamalabdullah100
AjiteshArun
There are two problems in option E:

... a quite tense situation by publicly stating the debacle not to have been Smith’s fault.

1. A quite tense situation is not the right way to express that idea. For example:

She solved a question that was quite tough. ← This one is fine.
vs.
She solved a quite tough question. ← This is not correct.

He watched a movie that was quite long. ← This one is fine.
vs.
He watched a quite long movie. ← This is not correct.

2. Stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault is better (more direct) than stating the debacle not to have been Smith’s fault.

Why are the parts in bold not correct?


Quite cannot take that position in that structure. This is something that we'll have to remember.

a + quite + [adj] + [noun] ← This is not correct. We need to move that quite.

1. a quite tough question ← This is not correct.

2. a question that was/is quite tough ← This is fine.
3. quite a tough question ← This is fine.


AjiteshArun
Thanks for the nice explanation. I've a very little question based on your explanation.

If I say:
This one is a very hard question. Is it wrong? Should I say the following?
This one is very a hard question.

Or, is the highlighted part right? Should I say the following?
Quote:
I've a very little question based on your explanation.

I've very a little question based on your explanation.

Or, Is the rules only for the word quite?
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
gyanamaya
is the use "comma" ,before "by" in the correct option B necessary?
Is it necessary? Probably not... but that's not something you really need to worry about.

What matters is that (B) is the best option out of the five in this question. There are no black and white rules dictating when you should and should not use a comma to set off a modifier.

The first part of this post might also help, and if you want a totally excessive video on GMAT SC punctuation, you can find it here.
GMATNinja
Sir
How do we be sure that ''by publicly stating'' does not modify ''quite tense''?
Quote:
B. a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
User avatar
Ritwickhota
Joined: 09 Sep 2020
Last visit: 27 Feb 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 134
GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 2: 580 Q39 V30
GMAT 2: 580 Q39 V30
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

B. a situation that was quite tense, by publicly stating that the debacle was not Smith’s fault
I have a doubt here with the usage of the second "that" - Shouldn't 'that' have a noun to refer to? or is there another use case for the word?. Please help.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ritwickhota
I have a doubt here with the usage of the second "that" - Shouldn't 'that' have a noun to refer to? or is there another use case for the word?. Please help.
Hi Ritwickhota,

There are other ways to use that. For example, in "he said that the question was tough", we don't need to look for a noun for the that to point to.
   1   2   3   4   5 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts