Drilling
Ding. And all schools say that they cannot provide post-ding evaluation. To be honest, I think they have to provide feedback. At the end of the day the application fee is $250, it'sy a huge cost (given if you apply to 5-6 schools). So it is not fair not to provide a feedback. $250 only for reviewing your application and getting a ding. I really want to know why I got dinged. Based on what? I start believing admissions process is more subjective.
What are you talking about my fellow Canadian? They don't have to provide you anything. Where does it say anything like that? You're paying to get into the school and you either do or do not get in. They don't owe you anything more than a response regardless of how much it costs. Obviously the process is subjective. They're calling the shots, it's their game that you're trying to play.
I think the answer to your problem is where admission consultants come in and you get to shell out even more money. Kinda sad but the entire process is a business. That's why schools will almost always tell you to apply, they want your money and have a high number of rejections.
I still wish that they provided some sort of feedback, such as GMAT too low, GPA too low, not enough experience, too much experience, not enough extra curricular etc... My admission consultant told me that my main issue was my age (33), and I can't do anything about it. I actually asked the MIT people about it and they said it wasn't an issue. They even said that my profile was great for MIT and encouraged me to apply. Well, they didn't even give me a interview.
PS This is just my post ding whining. I'll get over it.