IanStewart wrote:
fskilnik wrote:
This is a delicate issue (I have already exchanged posts with other experts on this matter) because "each statement alone is sufficient to answer the question asked" does NOT guarantee, by itself, that the unique answers obtained in each statement must be the same. I mean, logically speaking, there is not such a restriction.
There is such a restriction, and for a good logical reason. Imagine the following DS question:
What is the value of x?
1. Either x=3 or x=4
2. Either x=5 or x=6
What is the answer to this DS question?
The example shown does not apply. All the issue is related to a DS question in which the right answer is (D). It´s not the case here, because each statement alone is NOT sufficient to answer the question asked (in a unique way).
IanStewart wrote:
It would be perfectly reasonable to say "using both statements, no value of x exists, so I've answered the question and the answer is C". But it would be just as reasonable to say "using both statements, I can't solve the question because no value of x exists, so the answer is E". There is no logically correct answer to this question.
According to DS rules, when it is questioned "what is the value of x?" , we must consider a statement sufficient if, and only if, the statement gives us only one answer, in this case, a unique numerical answer.
If each one alone is not sufficient, THEN AND ONLY THEN we must consider both statements together and, in your scenario, the fact that there is no value of x that satisfies both statements together implies that the problem must be considered wrong, in other words, it is not well-stated, in other words, there is no answer. Not C, Not E, Not A, Not B and Not D.
IanStewart wrote:
So it always must be true in any DS question that the two statements are logically consistent - it needs to be possible for both statements to be true simultaneously, since sometimes test takers will combine the statements.
Yes, this is a nice argument for the "elegancy" I mentioned. Unfortunately it is a strong argument but, IN MY OPINION, not a "smocking gun". Please respect that.
I repeat: I wish I had a conclusive remark to save the day or, of course, I would like YOU to have one. Till now, I couldn´t have one that would close the matter according to MY level of rigor, so to speak.
IanStewart wrote:
If the statements are not consistent, then you can have situations where a question has two perfectly justifiable 'correct' answers, which is obviously something that can't happen on the GMAT.
In the case in which (D) is the right answer, we would have finished the problem before any logical trouble starts. But, again, I agree your vision is the nicer, because if we agree on your terms, alternative choice (D) does not have a "special treatment". In terms of "symmetry beauty", the Oscar goes to your argument. No doubt!
Well, nice discussion Ian. It´s a pleasure to see you are still active!
Kind Regards,
Fabio.