GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jul 2018, 01:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 205
Location: India
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2010, 10:15
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

59% (01:27) correct 41% (01:13) wrong based on 316 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Most Helpful Community Reply
6 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 323
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2010, 13:09
6
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
IMO.... D

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States. - Weakens

(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers. - Weakens

(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market. - Weakens

(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe. - Correct. As this statement has no effect on the conclusion of the stem. The conclusion is "the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better." This option only says the passengers have greater chance of accident in US. The reason could be anything!

(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents. - Weakens
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

General Discussion
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 48
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2010, 10:23
1
option D.
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 205
Location: India
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2010, 11:42
3
SudiptoGmat wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
Clearly explains that its not the belt but the habit of europeans. So out

(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
Clearly explains that its not the belt but the training which help them. So out

(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
If the car is more sturdy them chances of severe accident becomes less. so out

(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
Completely out of scope and doesnt explain why safety belt will not reduce the chances of severe accident

(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
So belt is not so effective as was thought to be so out


_________________

Cheers,
SD

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 186
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2010, 12:46
1
SudiptoGmat wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.weakens.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.weakens
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.does a sturdy construction ensure less severe injuries..Cant be sure acc to me..Best answer..
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.weakens
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.weaken.



the answer is C acc to me..from the passage any reason that strengthens or is neutral towards the conclusion is the answer..
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2010, 06:36
After going through the options, I have reduced my answer options to D and E.
Among these two, I would choose E. Because:

E mentiones that "States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average....... "
If we obsere the BOLD letter - Requiring - in the above statement, it is clear that the states have not yet implemented the rule but just conemplating of doing it so. And this options-E, as whole neither weaken not strengthen the argument, hnce the answer.

Coming to option D, it says that there are some other reasons(statistical) other than the lack of safetly belt to the severe accidents in US. In a way, it eakens the argument, hence its not the correct answed.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 212
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2010, 07:49
Sudipto...where did you get the question. Although I got the answer right (i.e. D), I was not sure about the argument after reading the choices.

I phrase argument like: More stringent safety belt designs would better protect passengers in US as already shown in Europe.
I thought there was a scope shift in 'different kind' to 'design'

After reading the answers I had to rephrase my argument: US needs more stringent rules to protect US passengers.
I am little unsure about all this.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 137
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Feb 2010, 03:54
D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.

the ans should be D since more number of injuries and severity of injury is completely different
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 26
Location: United States (KS)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.95
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2010, 14:23
D is my guess. . .statement indicates a greater chance of accident. . this is not relevent to the conclusion. . .does not strengthen or weaken
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 229
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2012, 07:14
I agree with the opinions of the most, i.e., D.
But, initially I overlooked the word EXCEPT in the question and struggled a lot. Need to read questions carefully... :roll:
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 May 2016
Posts: 121
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2016, 11:54
I have a doubt with E, argument says United States needs to adopt more stringent standards
why because in US passengers involved in auto mobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe
and in Europe require a different kind of safety belt.
What if same Europe is applied in states and injurious severity reduces.
to strengthen assumption is Europe seat belt is not able to reduce severity hence US need more standard.
PLease explain
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3686
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2016, 02:36
mbaprep2016 wrote:
I have a doubt with E, argument says United States needs to adopt more stringent standards
why because in US passengers involved in auto mobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe
and in Europe require a different kind of safety belt.
What if same Europe is applied in states and injurious severity reduces.
to strengthen assumption is Europe seat belt is not able to reduce severity hence US need more standard.
PLease explain


No, E says "States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents." This point itself makes doubt if the European safety belt was the only reason in reduction of injuries in Europe, as the same when applied to other nations didn't provide similar or near to similar results. Thus , it could happen that seat belt is not something that is causing severe accidents in US. hence, E is a weakener.
--
Hit Kudos if you like the answer.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1876
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2017, 22:15
abhimahna wrote:
mbaprep2016 wrote:
I have a doubt with E, argument says United States needs to adopt more stringent standards
why because in US passengers involved in auto mobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe
and in Europe require a different kind of safety belt.
What if same Europe is applied in states and injurious severity reduces.
to strengthen assumption is Europe seat belt is not able to reduce severity hence US need more standard.
PLease explain


No, E says "States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents." This point itself makes doubt if the European safety belt was the only reason in reduction of injuries in Europe, as the same when applied to other nations didn't provide similar or near to similar results. Thus , it could happen that seat belt is not something that is causing severe accidents in US. hence, E is a weakener.
--
Hit Kudos if you like the answer.


Is this a gmat-like question?
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1876
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2017, 22:17
mojorising800 wrote:
SudiptoGmat wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.weakens.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.weakens
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.does a sturdy construction ensure less severe injuries..Cant be sure acc to me..Best answer..
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.weakens
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.weaken.



the answer is C acc to me..from the passage any reason that strengthens or is neutral towards the conclusion is the answer..


I understand your thinkings, but D is actually the answer, not C.
First, D gives a statistic to support the conclusion, and hence D strengthens the argument.
Secondly, D does not give a reverse causal relationship. Even if there is a reverse causal relationship, D does not make much sense.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1876
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2017, 22:18
SudiptoGmat wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.


what is the source of this question? It looks like a sub-600
Re: In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in   [#permalink] 13 Nov 2017, 22:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.