mk96
GMATNinja
Luckisnoexcuse
can anyone throw some light on the construct of option C & E
is the construction of C better is the only thing which makes it the right option or option E has some grammer/ly mistake?
I don't think there are grammar errors, exactly, in (E), but it's a little bit illogical. This doesn't happen a whole lot on the GMAT, but the comma warps the meaning in (E):
Quote:
Kudzu, an Asian vine that has grown rampantly in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s to thwart soil erosion, has overrun many houses and countless acres of roadside.
(C) that has grown rampant in the southern United States since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
(E) growing rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
If we look very literally at (C), it's saying that the vine has grown rampant
in the time since it was introduced in the 1920s. That makes perfect sense, and the word "since" is a reference to time.
But as soon as we put the comma before "since" in (E), the word "since" takes on a different meaning. The phrase "since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart soil erosion" becomes a non-essential modifier -- and it seems to be giving us an explanation. "Since" now functions as a synonym for "because": "the vine growing rampantly in the southern US,
because it was introduced to thwart erosion, has overrun..."
That's not quite what we're trying to say here: the vine hasn't grown rampant
because it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart erosion -- it's just become rampant
in the time since the 1920s.
Nasty and subtle, no?
For more on the "rampant" vs. "rampantly" issue, see my explanation above:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/kudzu-an-asi ... l#p1854183GMAT Ninja- Can you please explain to me one small b/w option B and option C?
Why is rampant the correct usage here?
Isn't rampantly (adverb) modifies the grown (verb) aptly? Is the use of Rampantly incorrect? The official guide comments that "The adverbial clause since it was introduced in the 1920s should not be set off from has grown rampantly, which it modifies" in option B? Can you please explain to me why there is a need for that? Is it an essential modifier? If yes, how do we come to know about it?
Cheers! And thank you in advance.
You're absolutely right that rampantly seems logical here. That's not the problem with (B). The real issue is the way the meaning of "since" changes when it become part of a non-essential modifier. Consider an example:
Tim has been screaming at his children since they put detergent in the pancake batter this morning.
In this example, "since" seems to function as a time stamp, telling us
when Tim began screaming.
However, watch what happens if we put a comma before "since."
Tim has been screaming at his children, since they put detergent in the pancake batter this morning.
Now, "Tim has been screaming at his children," is cut off from the "since" modifier by a comma, and the pause makes it sound as though "since" is functioning as a synonym for "because," telling us
why Tim began screaming.
Either construction could work -- it's all context dependent.
Take another look at (B):
Quote:
Kudzu, an Asian vine that has grown rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s for thwarting soil erosion, has overrun many houses and countless acres of roadside.
Notice that this is more like the second example in which we have the initial clause set off from the "since" modifier with a comma. Again, the pause makes it seem as though "since" means "because," and is essentially telling why the first clause happened. But that meaning doesn't work here. The vine isn't growing out of control
because it was introduced in the 20's. Rather it
started growing out of control in the 20's. This is the meaning we get in (C), which has a construction similar to that of our first example above.
To summarize, because we want to communicate
when the growth happened, and not
why it happened, (C) is more logical than (B).
Takeaway: The rampant vs rampantly choice is a red herring in this question, and a good reminder that just because there is a difference between options, it doesn't mean that the difference is actually relevant, so make sure not to agonize too much over any supposed decision point. If one option is clearly superior to the other, use it. If not, look for other issues to attack.
Also, that comma thing is really, really subtle, and I can't think of many other official GMAT questions that torment test-takers over that particular issue. So don't lose too much sleep over it.
I hope that helps!