Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:42 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [17]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [17]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
targetbusiness
Joined: 06 Mar 2017
Last visit: 24 Feb 2021
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 330
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Posts: 177
Kudos: 396
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
soumya170293
E looks more concise and better contender to be the potential answer .

But I 've a doubt

the number of guests - who express /es -- Because 'The number of' is always singular opposed to ' A number of ' which is always plural .
Hi soumya170293, whether it should be express or expresses, depends on what who is modifying: if who is modifying guests, then the correct verb is express; if who is modifying the number, then the correct verb is expresses.

From the intended meaning of the sentence, it is quite clear that the ultimate goal of is to reduce the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service.

So, reduce which guests?

Answer: Those who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service.

Hence, who is intended to modify guests. Hence, the correct verb is express.
avatar
AkashM
Joined: 28 Jul 2019
Last visit: 03 Jun 2021
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 102
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,

If I have understood correctly, using with as a conjunction or with + participle phrase to describe an action is in poor style according to GMAT. But the OA does just that.

Going along with the same approach, isn't C a right choice. Why is it wrong to reduce the level of dissatisfaction instead of the number of guests who are feeling dissatisfied.

Have I got this wrong?

Please help.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AkashM
Hi experts,

If I have understood correctly, using with as a conjunction or with + participle phrase to describe an action is in poor style according to GMAT. But the OA does just that.

Going along with the same approach, isn't C a right choice. Why is it wrong to reduce the level of dissatisfaction instead of the number of guests who are feeling dissatisfied.

Have I got this wrong?

Please help.
Sadly, as I say all the time, there are very few concrete, black and white grammar "rules" that you can blindly apply to GMAT SC. Just because ", with..." doesn't work in some incorrect answer choices doesn't mean that it's always wrong. And if you wanted to eliminate (E) JUST because it uses ", with", you'd have to eliminate (C) as well -- it also uses a ", with" construction (the addition of the modifier "ultimately" doesn't change the function of the "with").

Reducing the LEVEL of dissatisfaction among guests would make some sense... but that's not what we have in (C). Instead, we have, "... the goal to reduce expressions of overall dissatisfaction by the guests with the hotel service."

  • You can reduce a LEVEL of dissatisfaction, but it's illogical to reduce the "expressions" themselves. We don't have that problem in choice (E), so that's one vote against (C).
  • Also, "... by the guests with the hotel service" is a bit confusing -- "with the hotel service" seems like it could modify "guests" here, and that wouldn't make any sense. The intended meaning is clearer in choice (E).
  • Lastly, "ultimately with the goal" modifies the preceding clause ("The tourism commission has conducted surveys..."). But what would it mean to "conduct ultimately"? Does it mean it's the final time they'll ever conduct a survey? It's far more logical for "ultimate" to describe the "goal."

So if you compare all the logical problems in (C), to the more coherent meaning in (E), it's clear that (E) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
doublewhammy
Joined: 17 Feb 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2023
Posts: 142
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Posts: 142
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
does "expressing" in option "a" act as a gerund? Which noun does it modify? also, since there is no "to be" verb it can't act as a verb
It seems expressing is acting like a verb, can we eliminate a on basis of this fact?
User avatar
goaltop30mba
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2025
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 407
Posts: 188
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Experts, please help.

Lots of great explanations, however there is something that I need to understand.

Goal already means “purpose” , so using “goal” and “to” together creates redundancy?

The original sentence would mean the same if I say — “the tourism commission conducted surveys to reduce the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service.”

Also, shouldn’t it be hotels’ services(plural of service) ??

AjiteshArun GMATNinja

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
INSEADIESE
Experts, please help.

Lots of great explanations, however there is something that I need to understand.

Goal already means “purpose” , so using “goal” and “to” together creates redundancy?

The original sentence would mean the same if I say — “the tourism commission conducted surveys to reduce the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service.”

Also, shouldn’t it be hotels’ services(plural of service) ??

AjiteshArun GMATNinja
Hi INSEADIESE,

1. This is not that to (to has a number of uses, and it does not always mean "in order to"). Here are a couple of quick examples in which goal is immediately followed by to:
a. It was his goal to hit six boundaries in one over. ← "To hit six boundaries in one over was his goal"
b. ... communicate their goal to the rest of the company during... ← "communicate X to Y"

2. This particular service is a non-count noun. If we were looking at ~types of work, we could certainly go with services ("the company offers multiple services"), but when we're looking at just "serving" customers (esp. hospitality/retail), service is non-count.
c. The service at the restaurant was great! ← This is the kind of service that we are looking at in this question.
d. The services at the restaurant were great! ← This is a completely different service.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
does "expressing" in option "a" act as a gerund? Which noun does it modify? also, since there is no "to be" verb it can't act as a verb
It seems expressing is acting like a verb, can we eliminate a on basis of this fact?
Interesting question, but there are better reasons to eliminate (A) here. To see how the phrase, "end up + -ing" works, consider a simpler example:

    If Tim remains their legal guardian, his kids will surely end up becoming sugar-addicted zombies.

Here "will... end up" seems to function as the main verb of that second clause. "Becoming" certainly isn't a verb, but whether we call it a gerund that functions as an object for "end up" or a participle that functions as an adverb isn't important here. All we care about is that there's no good reason to argue that the construction is wrong.

Now take another look at (A):

    The tourism commission has conducted surveys of hotels in the most popular resorts, with the ultimate goal of reducing the guests who end up expressing overall dissatisfaction with the service in the hotels.

The phrase "who end up expressing" is functioning as a modifier for "the guests." Within the modifier, "who" is the subject, and "end up" is the verb. I wouldn't worry too much about what to call "expressing," but there's no reason to believe it's an error.

It's more useful to recognize that "reducing the guests" is illogical. Are they making the guests physically smaller? It makes far more sense to write that they're reducing the number of guests. Because (A) has a nonsensical meaning, it's out.

Put another way, if a sentence is illogical, there's no reason to agonize over the grammar. So if you're unsure about one element of a sentence, look for others you're more confident about.

I hope that helps!
avatar
skycastle19
Joined: 22 Dec 2018
Last visit: 29 Jan 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja,

Could you please help explain (B)? I still had troubles understanding the difference in meaning between "the ultimate goal of reducing the number of guests" and "the goal to ultimately reduce the number of guests."

Thank you!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [7]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
skycastle19
Hi GMATNinja,

Could you please help explain (B)? I still had troubles understanding the difference in meaning between "the ultimate goal of reducing the number of guests" and "the goal to ultimately reduce the number of guests."

Thank you!
The difference between the two phrases comes down to what "ultimate" or "ultimately" is modifying. "Ultimate" means "final," so the "ultimate goal" would be the final goal. That makes perfect sense in this context. Maybe there are intermediate goals along the way, and the final one is to limit the number of unhappy guests. This is what we have in (E).

In the phrase "the goal to ultimately reduce," "ultimately" appears to modify "reduce." Now the meaning is a little muddier. Does the phrase mean to finally reduce, as though they'd been trying to reduce the number of unhappy guests for some time? Does the phrase suggest that there have been multiple reductions and this is the last one? Neither interpretation is as clear or logical as the "ultimate goal." That's enough to kill (B).

However, if you were still on the fence, (B) also contains the phrase, "guests who end up expressing overall dissatisfaction." The "end up" seems problematic. So the guests don't express their dissatisfaction at the time of their stay, but "end up" expressing dissatisfaction later? Wouldn't it be more clearer to just say that they're trying to reduce the number of guests who express dissatisfaction in general? Again, this is the construction we get in (E), so we have two pretty good reasons to eliminate (B).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
800GMAT2019
Joined: 01 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 May 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 201
Products:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anyone else find use of word "ultimate" somewhat redundant? "ultimate goal" should just be "goal" in my opinion.

(E) with the ultimate goal of reducing the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
800GMAT2019
Anyone else find use of word "ultimate" somewhat redundant? "ultimate goal" should just be "goal" in my opinion.

(E) with the ultimate goal of reducing the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service
Hi 800GMAT2019,

Maybe, but I think it's a common way to say that there may be other objectives here, but this is the main (final) goal.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The tourism commission has conducted surveys of hotels in the most popular resorts, with the ultimate goal of reducing the guests who end up expressing overall dissatisfaction with the service in the hotels.

(A) with the ultimate goal of reducing the guests who end up expressing overall dissatisfaction with the service in the hotels

(B) with the goal to ultimately reduce the number of guests who end up expressing overall dissatisfaction with the hotels' service

(C) ultimately with the goal to reduce expressions of overall dissatisfaction by the guests with the hotel service

(D) in an ultimate attempt to reduce the number of guests that ends up expressing overall dissatisfaction with the hotels' service

(E) with the ultimate goal of reducing the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels' service

Request Expert Reply:
Hi Honorable Experts,
MartyTargetTestPrep, GMATNinja, GMATGuruNY, AjiteshArun, VeritasPrepHailey, AnthonyRitz, BrightOutlookJenn, DmitryFarber,
Quote:
(E) The tourism commission has conducted surveys of hotels in the most popular resorts, with the ultimate goal of reducing the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels' service.
In choice E, it seems that The tourism commission is reducing the number of guests NOT directly reducing the guests. But, 'dissatisfaction' is shown by 'guests' NOT 'the number of guests'. It is absurd to see that 'dissatisfaction' is cause by 'guests' but we're NOT reducing 'guests'-we're reducing 'number'! Isn't it weird?
Thanks__
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi TheUltimateWinner,

Who refers to guests, not the number of guests:

... the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction...

One way to confirm that is to look at express, which is a plural verb. The number is singular, and we would have used a singular verb like expresses with it. Here's another quick example:

... reduce the number of accidents that involve large vehicles... ← This is ~ "bring down the number of {accidents of a particular type}".
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
Hi TheUltimateWinner,

Who refers to guests, not the number of guests:

... the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction...

One way to confirm that is to look at express, which is a plural verb. The number is singular, and we would have used a singular verb like expresses with it. Here's another quick example:

... reduce the number of accidents that involve large vehicles... ← This is ~ "bring down the number of {accidents of a particular type}".
AjiteshArun
Could you check question again-I've edited that part. Actually, my question was something different!
Thanks__
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [3]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
AjiteshArun
Could you check question again-I've edited that part. Actually, my question was something different!
Thanks__
Hi TheUltimateWinner,

I understand that you feel E sounds a little strange, but I'm not able to see why. Let's take another look at the example in my previous post:

... reduce the number of accidents that involve large vehicles... ~ reduce [the number of {accidents that involve large vehicles}]

If we're looking at reduce accidents vs. reduce the number of accidents, I'd say that both are possible. But between reduce guests and reduce the number of guests, I'd go for reduce the number of guests, because I don't think I've ever heard "reduce guests" before.

... reducing the number of guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service ~ reducing [the number of {guests who express overall dissatisfaction with the hotels’ service}]

I understand that I may not have answered your question. This is the sort of thing that I would anyway advise you to get a second opinion on, so you may have to tag everyone again. My apologies for that.
User avatar
vatsal323
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 09 Oct 2020
Last visit: 08 Jun 2022
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While I agree that E is the most appropriate answer here, the option should have said 'hotels' services' instead of 'hotels' service'. Because we are talking about multiple hotels and each of them provide their own kind of service. It can't be that all hotels are providing the same service. Is this line of thinking correct?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vatsal323
While I agree that E is the most appropriate answer here, the option should have said 'hotels' services' instead of 'hotels' service'. Because we are talking about multiple hotels and each of them provide their own kind of service. It can't be that all hotels are providing the same service. Is this line of thinking correct?
Hi vatsal323,

This particular service is a non-count noun. If we were looking at ~types of work, we could certainly go with services ("the company offers multiple services"), but when we're looking at just "serving" customers (esp. hospitality/retail), service is non-count.

1. The service at the restaurant was great! ← This is the kind of service that we are looking at in this question.

2. The services at the restaurant were great! ← This is a completely different service.

3. The services at the restaurants were great! ← This is like (2).
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts