AbdurRakib
In early Mesopotamian civilization, castor oil served
not only as a laxative, but also a skin-softening lotion and it was a construction lubricant for sliding giant stone blocks over wooden rollers.
A. not only as a laxative, but also a skin-softening lotion and it was a construction
B. as not only a laxative, but also a skin-softening lotion, and it was a construction
C. not only as a laxative but also as a skin-softening lotion and as a construction
aditliverpoolfc
the word *it* in both A and B is ambiguous right ?
Hi
aditliverpoolfc - Although I understand why you think that there may be
pronoun ambiguity in A and B—no, in B, there is no ambiguity, and in A,
I would be very hesitant to eliminate on the basis of pronoun ambiguity.
AS is a preposition in both instances, "used to refer to the function or character that ... something has:
Oxford Online Dictionary, HERE• Option B is grammatically correct and has no pronoun ambiguity issuesB) [C]astor oil served AS not only a laxative, but also a skin-softening lotion, and it was a construction[/u] lubricant for sliding giant stone blocks over wooden rollers.
CASTOR OIL-- served AS
----------[not only]
--------
a laxative----------[but also]
--------
a skin-softening lotion, AND
IT-- was
-------
a construction lubricantIt logically refers back to
castor oil in part because
castor oil and
it are parallel subjects of two independent clauses,
and in part because meaning is clear from context:
Mesopotamians used castor oil for three things.
• Option A? Eliminate because it ruins Not only as X but also as YI would not use pronoun ambiguity to eliminate A.
I would leave pronoun ambiguity as a last decision point
unless the question explicitly tests pronoun ambiguity.
A) Castor oil served not only
as a laxative, but also [
_____] a skin-softening lotion and it was a construction lubricant . . .
In A's structure, AS is not repeated.
The word
as should be repeated in the highlighted area.
This rule is subtle.
It is tested more frequently than I would have expected.
Not only X but also Y is a parallelism marker.
Lingo: the words are a correlative conjunction.
Correlative conjunctions are words that come in pairs; that conjoin; and that mark parallelism.
The moment we add a preposition, for example, to one element,
we must add that preposition to the other element.
There are two ways to "attach" the preposition to both elements.
We need the the preposition AS to "distribute" to both elements:
1) Put the preposition
outside the [not only X but also Y] structure
In this approach, the word
as "WILL distribute" to both terms [in the reader's mind]
AS(not only X. . . but also Y)
(If this were Quant, and AS were a variable, this way, "as" is factored out but applies to both terms):
p(a + b)2) Put the preposition inside the [not only . . . but also] structure TWO times
In this approach, the word
as "has been distributed" to both terms [the reader can see that AS is attached to each term]
Not only
AS X but also
AS Y
(If this were Quant, this way, "as" has been "multiplied" by each term:
(ap + bp)Correct: Not only
as X but also
as Y
Correct:
As not only X but also Y
Wrong: Not only as X but also Y
Wrong: As not only X but also as Y
mikemcgarry has an excellent post on parallelism and correlative conjunctions,
HERE.
Option A incorrectly uses the first wrong example.
Castor oil served not only as a laxative, but also __:(

___ a skin-softening lotio
Wrong.
Correction: Castor oil served not only as a laxative, but also
as a skin-softening lotion.
Option C has this correct structure.
• Option A - "it was" compared to C? Option A losesSuppose that we did not catch the parallelism error in A.
Maybe we notice that the "it was" is weird,
not because we think that the pronoun is logically confusing,
but because the sentence discusses three functions that
castor oil played but for reasons unknown sticks in an "it was" clause
rather than what should be just the third element in a list.
Move on. Compare to (C).
Is there
any doubt that C is better than A?
I would not use up precious time trying to find
very particular grammar errors in each option before I moved to the next option.
If I cannot find an obvious error (such as may be the case in B), I move on.
Of the next three options, C is the best by far.
Now I compare B to C. No contest.
If I had not seen the error in A, I would use the same process
as what I just described. (A) versus (C)? C wins.
• Option A: Pronoun ambiguity?Although I would rather not get into this area, I will try to answer.
I guess I would say that
• IF we did not catch the incorrect structure of
not only as X but also Y , and
• IF it were not obvious that C is superior to A, then
• eliminate A because the pronoun IT could be clearer.
The subject is castor oil. What follows describes the ways in which castor oil was used.
The preposition AS has these direct objects: laxative and lotion.
They describe functions of castor oil.
Logically, there is no reason to suppose that "construction lubricant"
is different from laxative or lotion; that is, construction lubricant is yet another function that castor oil had.
Laxative and
lotion are objects of prepositions that describe the subject
castor oil.Why would IT suddenly refer to the object of a proposition rather than the subject?
The argument is not airtight, but I would not eliminate option A on the basis
of pronoun ambiguity. YMMV.
The GMAC will tolerate quite a bit of pronoun ambiguity. The pronoun IT is not ideal in A, but I would use pronoun ambiguity as a last resort.
Hope that helps.