lstudentd
(2) bunuel said for statement 2 above that -1 < x < 1, so we have a NO answer.
But my question is, the stem asks if x<1 or x>9, so doesn't this answer yes x<1?
That post isn't correct; you are right that Statement 2 gives us a 'yes' answer to the question.
lstudentd
On a separate thread, bunuel answered regarding statement 1
(1) bunuel said x < -2 or x > 2. If x = -5, then answer is YES but if and x = 5, the answer is NO. Not sufficient
But my question is if x < -2, then it's definitely less than 1 also so it's that enough to be sufficient? Why do we need to consider two cases shared in the example above of if x= -5 then yes but if x = 5, then no?
From Statement 1, all you know about x is that it is some unknown number that is not between -2 and 2. The question then becomes (at least if we're trying to get a 'yes' answer to the question) : from that information alone, can you be sure that the value of x is not between 1 and 9? And you can't be sure, because if x is not between -2 and 2, then x can still be, say, 5, and then x is between 1 and 9, but x can also be -1000, and then x is not between 1 and 9.
If instead Statement 1 told us "x < -2", then it would certainly be sufficient alone, because it would then be impossible that x is equal to a number somewhere between 1 and 9.