GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2018, 11:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 755
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Sep 2017, 08:28
7
18
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:32) correct 37% (01:49) wrong based on 565 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

(A) Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.

(B) Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.

(C) Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.

(D) An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.

(E) Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.

Originally posted by TGC on 20 Jan 2013, 21:31.
Last edited by hazelnut on 10 Sep 2017, 08:28, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Jan 2013
Posts: 9
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2013, 13:03
5
2
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.
Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.
Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.
An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.
Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.

Because you are asked to weaken the author’s reasoning, and reasoning requires a conclusion, an argument will always be present. In order to maximize your
chances of success you must identify, isolate, and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument.

In this case

So the conclusion over here is the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answer choices impact the conclusion.

To weaken a conditional conclusion, attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for
the sufficient condition to occur.

The conditional statement over here is On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period
What if it is other way around, the school provided this extra recess period each day because the students were scoring high on state aptitude test.

Remember this for all weaken Questions:
The conclusion is the part of the argument that is most likely to be attacked, but the correct answer choice will not simply contradict the
conclusion. Instead, the correct answer will undermine the conclusion by showing that the conclusion fails to account for some element or possibility.
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Posts: 72
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2013, 11:43
targetgmatchotu wrote:
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.
Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.
Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.
An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.
Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.
Source: Veri Prep


our arguement presents a thought that higher scores are due to recess periods..option A weakens the arguement by crashing that point..@ targetgmat please make sure that you reread your post for some typos before you submit it..i had a problem in understanding the information in the stimulus especially on this part(state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period) regards chiccufrazer :-)

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: GMAT Streetfighter!!
Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 42
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2013, 00:14
2
1
I love these cause/effect arguments!

Recess w/unstructured play>>high scores on aptitude test.

Weaken the argument by proving that the reverse is true:

High scores on aptitude test>>Recess w/unstructured play


Answer choice A matches this perfectly..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 74
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2013, 20:49
Why cant it be C

Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.

If Malthus is already at peak, you cant do much to increase the scores. Please help clarify why this is not better than A?
_________________

One Last Shot

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1038
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2013, 22:26
4
surya167 wrote:
Why cant it be C

Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.

If Malthus is already at peak, you cant do much to increase the scores. Please help clarify why this is not better than A?


Hi surya

C: Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.
C only says Malthus already enjoys above average scores. "Above average" does not mean "at peak". Assume average score is 3 in score scale 1-5. What if Malthus average score is 4 <== clearly, 4 is above average. But Malthus still wants its average score to improve more.
Hence, C does not weaken the conclusion.

A: Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.
A mentions that extra unstructured recess is not the cause, but the result of high score performance. By showing the reverse relationship is TRUE, A weaken the cause & effect conclusion.

Hop it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 116
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2013, 21:48
TGC wrote:
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.
Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.
Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.
An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.
Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.
Source: Veri Prep


Hi,

I am not ashamed to say that the more i do CR, the more i need to practice.
However, let me add my 2 cents.

PREMISE: Schools providing extra recess period each day during which children ago unstructured play ===> score higher on state aptitude tests than schools that do not provide such a recess period.

CONCLUSION: The test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

PRE-THINKING:

1. The same trend will follow in future. i.e no obstruction will occur during implementation of the plan at Malthus Elementary.
2. Cause and effect: extra recess ===> higher state aptitude tests
3. The test score at Malthus Elementary school are representative to state aptitude test.( There is a difference in terms, maybe the test that Malthus Elementary have are internal tests)

CHOICES:
A) Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.

This weakens our assumption 2. This shows that until students score well they will not get extra unstructured recess period.
According to this option, the event will never occur. Because here, Effect Y occurs prior to Cause X, weakening the argument.

B) Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.

The comparison b.w various schools makes no sense, it actually strengthens the argument that the plan will be effective.

C) Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.

Malthus wants to improve the score. It already enjoys has no effect on the conclusion.We have to weaken the conclusion that something will obstruct it.

D) An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.

This is the tricky part. The argument already states that children go for unstructured play, and this unstructured play somewhere helps them to score better.
So, this option does not weaken the fact that unstructured play helps to score better.

E) Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.

Look at the word "formerly", the argument states that the extra recess is given on "daily basis".
Had the word "formerly" replaced with "daily", the argument would have weakened.

Therefore, i will go with A.

Thanks,
Jai
KUDOS if it HELPED..!!! :)
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 109
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2015, 15:05
A states the reverse cause-effect. I saw that right away. However, it's still true that the reward itself is the cause, as an incentive for students to do well. So, answer choice A is more or less neutral.

C states that students are already above average. Yes, adding the recess may help cause students' grades to increase, but the increase would have a smaller possible range than if the students' grades were average or below average. In fact, I would argue that there are diminishing returns as grades are already high, which is a reasonable assumption.

D is interesting because it seems to state the opposite claim of what was given in the passage. For example, Given: A causes B. Answer choice (which you must accept as true): A causes -B. But, that isn't necessarily the case here. Even if students study less, they are still experiencing better grades. Perhaps they are performing better because they are more energized, there's higher morale, etc.

A is marginally better than C, because A has the possibility of countering the conclusion's cause-effect assumption; whereas, C has the minimum possibility of no change in the students' grades. Therefore, A.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2654
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2016, 21:29
1
TGC wrote:
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.
Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.
Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.
An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.
Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.
Source: Veri Prep


this is a cause->effect type of question.
cause = extra recess period
effect = improved sores.

to weaken, we would need to provide evidence that:
1. recess period happened before the improvement of the scores
2. improved scores caused the extra recess period - students were given more free time because they already perform well
3. alternate cause.

A provides example for the second weakener. so A is the correct answer choice.
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 629
Location: India
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2016, 02:37
Thee focus in this question should be anything negative on unstructured recess period or improvement in score. Only choice A and C do that. But in C it is only said that switch to unstructured recess period is not as good as just an extra recess period but it may still be good. Choice A means the improvement is likely not because of unstructured recess period because the students were already good.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Holistic Solutions
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 19 Mar 2016
Posts: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT ToolKit User
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Sep 2017, 08:29
1
Quote:
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests than schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

A Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.
B Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.
C Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.
D An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.
E Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.

_________________

Please correct me in case I'm wrong; consider giving kudos, otherwise.


Originally posted by nazgull on 17 Jun 2017, 20:04.
Last edited by hazelnut on 10 Sep 2017, 08:29, edited 1 time in total.
Please search before posting.
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1315
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 08:26
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

(A) Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.

(B) Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess.

(C) Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question.

(D) An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests.

(E) Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess.

Solution: A

Begin this question as you would any Weaken question: locate the conclusion, negate it, and seek support for the negation. The negation here would be that Malthus might NOT benefit from an extra period, and while a number of answer choices raise that possibility, (A) does so most convincingly, stating that the extra period was not the cause of the increased scores but a reward FOR the increased scores – in other words, a benefit stemming from a result, not necessarily a cause.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 490
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2017, 08:05
Hello Experts,

Can anyone explain why E isnt correct? Below is my thought process

If M already had a extra recess but still didn't see higher score from students, then it is highly unlike that introducing the recess (again) will improve the students score

Rather M has to implement something else if it does want to increase the score of its students

Please let me know where I am going wrong

Thanks :-)
_________________

My journey From 410 to 700 :-)
Here's my experience when I faced a glitch in my GMAT Exam
Don't do this mistake when you give your GMATPrep Mock!
NEW GMATPrep software analysis by Bunuel

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2086
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2017, 04:32
On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day during which children are allowed unstructured play score higher on state aptitude tests that schools that do not provide such a recess period. Therefore, the test scores at Malthus Elementary would likely improve if the school adds a recess period of unstructured play.

Type - weaken
Boil it down - If Malthus Elementary adds a recess period of unstructured play , then the test scores at ME is likely to improve

(A) Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.- Correct - Reverse cause

(B) Schools that add an extra period of recess perform better than schools that merely switch from structured to unstructured recess. - Irrelevant

(C) Malthus already enjoys above average scores on the aptitude tests in question. - Incorrect - it does not mean that scores can't still improve

(D) An extra recess period allows students less time to study for their aptitude tests. - Incorrect - quantity of study time is less , but what about quality

(E) Malthus formerly had an extra period of recess. - Irrelevant

Answer A
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Jul 2017
Posts: 52
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.87
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2017, 12:23
(A) Nearly all of the schools providing the extra unstructured recess period provided it to reward students for their performance on the aptitude tests.

The argument assumes that having a recess period causes the increase in performance.
(A) shatters this cause and effect relationship by saying that it is not the recess period that causes an increase in performance.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1714
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2018, 19:52
It is quite strange for me. Many questions have similar patterns, but some have higher difficulty level than other questions.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin &nbs [#permalink] 25 Mar 2018, 19:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

On average, schools that provide an extra recess period each day durin

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.