Totally understand! Sorry I wasn't as clear as I could have been. I did review the test yesterday, but just didn't think that listing every problem was something I should do. Overall, I think quant is "I know 40% of what I should know before I even think about tactics/organization," while Verbal, I believe, is very much at the point of just trying to hone in on certain problem types that are giving me a lot of trouble. Hopefully the below is what you're looking for:
Quant:
-Overall, I do not have the ability to correctly answer most of the quant questions I got wrong. I believe I need to review the basic math for a number of topics. It's even hard for me to explain where I went wrong, so sorry if this is still vague.
-I do not have the ability to answer data sufficiency questions. I guess every single one of them, so even for the ones I got right (3 in total), it feels pointless to count those. Even something so simple as divisibility and primes in a data sufficiency question stumps me
-For questions that required any algebraic translation, I was lost.
-For questions that involved algebraic equations, such as the quadratic equation, I couldn't solve
-Percentage questions that involved taking 60% of 40% and so on I feel like I could solve generally, but tactically I'm poor at putting those questions down on paper effectively
-The same goes for ratio questions, where I lose myself in the details and am not mapping them as well as I can
-Probability problems I'm poor at. E.g. "12 kids are selected in a class of 18 at random to do X activity, and there are 2/3 boys and 1/3 girls. What's the probability that the 12 kids selected will comprise 2/3 boys"
Overall, I believe I'm just still not confident enough with the basics to even think about how to tactically cover the quant portion of the test
Verbal:
-The sentence correction problems I got wrong had to do with modifiers, structure (so, syntax essentially), and I messed up a subject verb agreement. As an English major, that one was an embarrassing miss. I also got a pronoun one wrong that I think was a total fluke; it was a parallelism issue.
-The reading comprehension problems I got wrong were the "According to the passage, all of the following are true EXCEPT:" kind of questions. I have trouble narrowing those down sometimes, so I think a strategy may help there
-Also, the critical reasoning problems were also tough. Especially the ones that read like "Which of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the reasoning above?" I'm not sure how to practice those from a more strategic perspective. I end up guessing a lot of those.
-Another set of problems that kept annoying me were the ones that read like "It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following statements is true of..." Inference is tough for me, because that just leaves every answer to be vaguely right in my eyes. I don't have a decent tactic to tackle those just yet.
-Even the thesis-driven "The primary purpose of the passage is to" questions I got wrong as well more often than I thought.