Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:10 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Modifiers|   Pronouns|   Subject Verb Agreement|                  
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
burgeoning
Joined: 26 Jul 2015
Last visit: 15 Feb 2018
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vinod332002
Thanks for the reply, but I dont quite follow how "which" leads to an incorrect meaning in D - which modifies the word (noun) closest.. here cant farm equipment and land be what "which" refers to?
Hi Vinod, GMAT exhibits a preference for that, when the intent is to refer to a list (such as farm equipment and land in this case). Hence, in this sentence, which would refer to land only, and this is an issue here.

Quote:
Declining values for farm equipment and land, which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.
Actually there is another issue with this. As a matter of (what we call) writing preference, you would never find any correct sentence on GMAT where the clause ends in a preposition. So, the clause which farmers use as collateral to borrow against would not be correct, because this clause ends with a preposition against.
User avatar
abrakadabra21
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
218
 [6]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 251
Kudos: 218
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Declining values for farm equipment and land, the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through
the harvest season, is going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.


(D) which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, are
(E) the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, are

Declining values so it should be "are"

Ron explanation:-

one real problem with choice (d) is the modifier “to borrow against”, which ends with a preposition. modifiers are not allowed to end with prepositions.
this is a very common form in spoken language, but it's incorrect in the written language.
examples:

wrong: "the restaurant (that) we ate at on friday was crowded."
right: "the restaurant at which we ate on friday was crowded."

wrong: "the person joe spoke to yesterday told him that ..."
right: "the person to whom joe spoke yesterday told him that ..."

wrong: "now that i've moved, i need to find a new grocery store to shop at."
right: "now that i've moved, i need to find a new grocery store at which to shop.
User avatar
RMD007
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Status:Countdown Begins...
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
Posts: 236
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi sayantanc2k
I have few doubts and would be happy if you can clarify..
In the above sentence, I understand that, the collateral is defined for values (which are declining) of farm equipment and land, and the same acts as Resumptive Modifier. Please correct this, if it is wrong. I got the understanding about Resumtpive modifier from - a-group-of-paleontologists-recently-announced-that-a-site-in-89765.html#p1700111

Now, I found a similar post of Manhantten Verbal Legend - RON, which describes similar concept about concrete noun and abstract noun.(https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... tml#p35386)
The terminologies used in the post and mentioned for Resumptive modifier are similar and thus, I am not able to differentiate between two. Can you please explain this with few examples and also in a given sentence, how can I figure out that some term is a resumptive modifier or an abstract noun?

Thanks in Advance
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [15]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [15]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RMD007
Hi sayantanc2k
I have few doubts and would be happy if you can clarify..
In the above sentence, I understand that, the collateral is defined for values (which are declining) of farm equipment and land, and the same acts as Resumptive Modifier. Please correct this, if it is wrong. I got the understanding about Resumtpive modifier from - a-group-of-paleontologists-recently-announced-that-a-site-in-89765.html#p1700111

Now, I found a similar post of Manhantten Verbal Legend - RON, which describes similar concept about concrete noun and abstract noun.(https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... tml#p35386)
The terminologies used in the post and mentioned for Resumptive modifier are similar and thus, I am not able to differentiate between two. Can you please explain this with few examples and also in a given sentence, how can I figure out that some term is a resumptive modifier or an abstract noun?

Thanks in Advance

Understanding the difference between the following two types of modifiers would hopefully clarify your doubt:

1. Appositive modifier: A noun used to modify another noun:

Marc, my best FRIEND, will come tomorrow.
Here the noun "friend" modifies another noun "Marc" and hence is an appositive. (Also note that "my best" is an adjectival phrase that modifies the appositive "friend" in turn).
Now consider option E and compare with the above:
Declining values for farm equipment and land, THE COLLATERAL against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.
Here the noun "the collateral" modifies another noun phrase"farm equipment and land" and hence is an appositive. (Also note that "against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season" is a relative clause modifier that modifies the appositive"the collateral" in turn).

2. Absolute phrase modifier: A noun + noun modifier structure used to refer to a clause as a whole. (The following example is from Manhattan SC guide)

Scientists have found high levels of iridium in certain geological formations around the world, results that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago.
The underlined part above is the absolute phrase modifier (Noun = results, noun modifier = that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago). THe absolute phrase modifier modifies the whole clause.

2a. Resumptive modifier: A special case of Absolute phrase modifier - the noun within the absolute phrase is a repetition of another noun already used in the clause.
Scientists presented the results of their research , results that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago.
The underlined part above is the absolute phrase modifier (Noun = results, noun modifier: that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago). THe absolute phrase modifier modifies the whole clause. THe noun "results" is repeated.

Abstract noun is something else altogether and bears no relation with the above discussion. A noun that cannot be touched, but can only be felt is an abstract noun. Examples: love, faith, trust, pain etc. (You may go through any high school grammar book to recapitulate the different types of nouns).

Please note that the noun within the absolute phrase modifier (or resumptive modifier) need not be an abstract noun -
After decades of hard work, the workers built the monument, the monument that we all have read about in the history book.
The noun within the resumptive modifier ("The monument") is NOT an abstract noun, but a common noun.


Please let me know if you still have doubts.
User avatar
AR15J
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Last visit: 15 May 2024
Posts: 214
Own Kudos:
161
 [1]
Given Kudos: 145
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 214
Kudos: 161
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
RMD007
Hi sayantanc2k
I have few doubts and would be happy if you can clarify..
In the above sentence, I understand that, the collateral is defined for values (which are declining) of farm equipment and land, and the same acts as Resumptive Modifier. Please correct this, if it is wrong. I got the understanding about Resumtpive modifier from - https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-group-of-pa ... l#p1700111

Now, I found a similar post of Manhantten Verbal Legend - RON, which describes similar concept about concrete noun and abstract noun.(https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... tml#p35386)
The terminologies used in the post and mentioned for Resumptive modifier are similar and thus, I am not able to differentiate between two. Can you please explain this with few examples and also in a given sentence, how can I figure out that some term is a resumptive modifier or an abstract noun?

Thanks in Advance

Understanding the difference between the following two types of modifiers would hopefully clarify your doubt:

1. Appositive modifier: A noun used to modify another noun:

Marc, my best FRIEND, will come tomorrow.
Here the noun "friend" modifies another noun "Marc" and hence is an appositive. (Also note that "my best" is an adjectival phrase that modifies the appositive "friend" in turn).
Now consider option E and compare with the above:
Declining values for farm equipment and land, THE COLLATERAL against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.
Here the noun "the collateral" modifies another noun phrase"farm equipment and land" and hence is an appositive. (Also note that "against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season" is a relative clause modifier that modifies the appositive"the collateral" in turn).

2. Absolute phrase modifier: A noun + noun modifier structure used to refer to a clause as a whole. (The following example is from Manhattan SC guide)

Scientists have found high levels of iridium in certain geological formations around the world, results that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago.
The underlined part above is the absolute phrase modifier (Noun = results, noun modifier = that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago). THe absolute phrase modifier modifies the whole clause.

2a. Resumptive modifier: A special case of Absolute phrase modifier - the noun within the absolute phrase is a repetition of another noun already used in the clause.
Scientists presented the results of their research , results that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago.
The underlined part above is the absolute phrase modifier (Noun = results, noun modifier: that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago). THe absolute phrase modifier modifies the whole clause. THe noun "results" is repeated.

Abstract noun is something else altogether and bears no relation with the above discussion. A noun that cannot be touched, but can only be felt is an abstract noun. Examples: love, faith, trust, pain etc. (You may go through any high school grammar book to recapitulate the different types of nouns).

Please note that the noun within the absolute phrase modifier (or resumptive modifier) need not be an abstract noun -
After decades of hard work, the workers built the monument, the monument that we all have read about in the history book.
The noun within the resumptive modifier ("The monument") is NOT an abstract noun, but a common noun.


Please let me know if you still have doubts.


Thanks for wonderful explanation. I had a similar doubt.

1. Can resumptive modifier refer to other type of the noun (other than abstract).?

I gave her a squared bowl, a bowl that can only be found in Russia. ---is it the correct usage of resumptive modifier?

2.In the below sentence, can we say that modifier -- a consultant in los angeles-- is an appositive modifier?

I went to the bar with john smith, a consultant in los angeles.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AR15J
sayantanc2k
RMD007
Hi sayantanc2k
I have few doubts and would be happy if you can clarify..
In the above sentence, I understand that, the collateral is defined for values (which are declining) of farm equipment and land, and the same acts as Resumptive Modifier. Please correct this, if it is wrong. I got the understanding about Resumtpive modifier from - a-group-of-paleontologists-recently-announced-that-a-site-in-89765.html#p1700111

Now, I found a similar post of Manhantten Verbal Legend - RON, which describes similar concept about concrete noun and abstract noun.(https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... tml#p35386)
The terminologies used in the post and mentioned for Resumptive modifier are similar and thus, I am not able to differentiate between two. Can you please explain this with few examples and also in a given sentence, how can I figure out that some term is a resumptive modifier or an abstract noun?

Thanks in Advance

Understanding the difference between the following two types of modifiers would hopefully clarify your doubt:

1. Appositive modifier: A noun used to modify another noun:

Marc, my best FRIEND, will come tomorrow.
Here the noun "friend" modifies another noun "Marc" and hence is an appositive. (Also note that "my best" is an adjectival phrase that modifies the appositive "friend" in turn).
Now consider option E and compare with the above:
Declining values for farm equipment and land, THE COLLATERAL against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.
Here the noun "the collateral" modifies another noun phrase"farm equipment and land" and hence is an appositive. (Also note that "against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season" is a relative clause modifier that modifies the appositive"the collateral" in turn).

2. Absolute phrase modifier: A noun + noun modifier structure used to refer to a clause as a whole. (The following example is from Manhattan SC guide)

Scientists have found high levels of iridium in certain geological formations around the world, results that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago.
The underlined part above is the absolute phrase modifier (Noun = results, noun modifier = that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago). THe absolute phrase modifier modifies the whole clause.

2a. Resumptive modifier: A special case of Absolute phrase modifier - the noun within the absolute phrase is a repetition of another noun already used in the clause.
Scientists presented the results of their research , results that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago.
The underlined part above is the absolute phrase modifier (Noun = results, noun modifier: that suggest the cataclysmic impact of a meteor millions of years ago). THe absolute phrase modifier modifies the whole clause. THe noun "results" is repeated.

Abstract noun is something else altogether and bears no relation with the above discussion. A noun that cannot be touched, but can only be felt is an abstract noun. Examples: love, faith, trust, pain etc. (You may go through any high school grammar book to recapitulate the different types of nouns).

Please note that the noun within the absolute phrase modifier (or resumptive modifier) need not be an abstract noun -
After decades of hard work, the workers built the monument, the monument that we all have read about in the history book.
The noun within the resumptive modifier ("The monument") is NOT an abstract noun, but a common noun.


Please let me know if you still have doubts.


Thanks for wonderful explanation. I had a similar doubt.

1. Can resumptive modifier refer to other type of the noun (other than abstract).?

I gave her a squared bowl, a bowl that can only be found in Russia. ---is it the correct usage of resumptive modifier?

2.In the below sentence, can we say that modifier -- a consultant in los angeles-- is an appositive modifier?

I went to the bar with john smith, a consultant in los angeles.

------------

+1 Kudos if you like the post :)

1. Yes, your understating is correct. Resumptive modifiers are not limited to just abstract nouns.
2. Yes, your understanding is correct . It is an appositive - the noun "consultant" modifies another noun "John Smith".
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,159
 [1]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,064
Kudos: 2,159
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Experts,

Please throw some light on my below doubts:

Declining values for farm equipment and land, which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.

1. In the above sentence, what does "which" modify? A. Declining values B. Farm equipment AND land C. Land (only) -- Please explain!
2. In the above sentence, what might be other issues present?

3. Can "which" refer back to 2 things separated by "and" in a sentence? Example: Coca Cola and Thumbs Up, which are produced by Coke, have same taste. --> is the usage of which correct here?

Regards
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [8]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [8]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatexam439
Hello Experts,

Please throw some light on my below doubts:

Declining values for farm equipment and land, which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.

1. In the above sentence, what does "which" modify? A. Declining values B. Farm equipment AND land C. Land (only) -- Please explain!
2. In the above sentence, what might be other issues present?

3. Can "which" refer back to 2 things separated by "and" in a sentence? Example: Coca Cola and Thumbs Up, which are produced by Coke, have same taste. --> is the usage of which correct here?

Regards
Dear gmatexam439,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

The word "which" is a relative pronoun. It always starts a particular kind of noun-modifying dependent clause, known as a relative clause. Because "which" is a pronoun, its antecedent is a noun, the target noun modified by the relative clause. Typically, this is the noun that the clause touches.

In this sentence, here's just the independent clause:
Declining values for farm equipment and land are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.
That's a 100% perfect sentence by itself, grammatically & logically correct, but it doesn't tell the whole story. If we think about the economics of the situation, we may wonder what the value of "farm equipment and land" has to do with loans & credit.

The noun-modifying clause beginning with "which" provides this additional information. This clause follows the parallel nouns "farm equipment and land" and modifies these nouns: these nouns therefore are the antecedent of the pronoun "which."

These two nouns are mentioned together, "farm equipment and land," and the sentence makes no attempt to distinguish them, so it is fair to say that the "which" clause must modify both of them. To some extent, the answer to this question has zero impact on the grammar of the sentence.

Declining values for farm equipment and land, which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.

This is a good sentence. The language in the "which" clause is a little causal and a little loose with prepositions. The construction "to get through" is colloquial, not formal. A more formal, well-written version might be:

1) Declining values for farm equipment and land, collateral against which farmers borrow to survive until the harvest season, are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.

2) Traditionally, each spring, farmers use farm equipment and land as collateral against which to borrow, to sustain themselves until the harvest, but this year, the declining values of these assets are going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit for these loans.

I don't know whether either one of these is the "best" way to convey this information, but these are certainly more academic and formal than the original version.

The pronoun "which" certainly can refer to two or more nouns in parallel, as can "who" and "that" and most other relative pronouns. For clarity, I would say:
Coca Cola and Thumbs Up, both of which are produced by Coke, have same taste.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Manat
Joined: 11 Jun 2018
Last visit: 22 Feb 2020
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
GMAT 1: 500 Q39 V21
GMAT 1: 500 Q39 V21
Posts: 121
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
confused between option D & E. Please help!
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [4]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manat
confused between option D & E. Please help!
The use of both borrow against and use as introduces redundancy.

... use as collateral to borrow against...

If someone borrows against X, he or she is using it as collateral.
avatar
gcantre3
Joined: 18 Sep 2018
Last visit: 21 Sep 2019
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How can "which" be used without a comma preceding it on the gmat? Also, If you use ",which" on the other answer choices, ",which" is ambiguous. "Which" could modify either land or equipment. The Gmat Test writers slacked off on this question.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gcantre3
How can "which" be used without a comma preceding it on the gmat?
Hi gcantre3, I am assuming you are referring to option E here.

Well, one would expect a comma before which on GMAT. However, there is an important exception to this: whenever which appears as part of prepositional phrase (against which in this case), there would not be a comma before which.

For example, following sentence is correct:

This is the car in which the perpetrators arrived at the crime scene.

Again, which appears as part of prepositional phrase (in which in this case); hence, there would not be a comma before which.
User avatar
PrashantK0099
Joined: 09 Sep 2020
Last visit: 27 Oct 2020
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Posts: 64
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Dear Ashish Sir,

Thanks for your wonderful explanation for option D ,

I am little Confuse in E,

"the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season are"

is the usage of which is correct because Which is succeded without a comma, such usage is fine?
because I have not seen sentences from GMAT where which is used without a comma.

Please clarify?


EducationAisle
sahilchaudhary

Hi Ashish,

Please explain why is D incorrect and E correct.
Couple of issues with D:

a) At the very least, "which" is ambiguous, since it is not clear whether "which" is modifying "land" or "equipment and land". In fact, for the most part, "which" is not likely to ever modify a "list" ("equipment and land" in this case).

b) "which farmers use as collateral to borrow against" does not conform with GMAT‘s stylistic preference. Modifier clauses (especially relative clauses) should not end with a preposition. Here, this clause ends in a preposition "against".
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PrashantK0099

I am little Confuse in E,

"the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season are"

is the usage of which is correct because Which is succeded without a comma, such usage is fine?
because I have not seen sentences from GMAT where which is used without a comma.

Please clarify?
Hi Prashant, you are right. Whenever which is present in a sentence, we would typically expect a comma before which.

A notable exception to this is when which is a part of prepositional phrase (against which in this sentence). In that case, there should be no comma before which.

For example:

This is the house in which two people live.

Again, notice that which is a part of prepositional phrase in which. Hence, there is no comma before which.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Declining values for farm equipment and land, the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, is going to force many lenders to tighten or deny credit this spring.

(A) the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, is
(B) which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, is
(C) the collateral which is borrowed against by farmers to get through the harvest season, is
(D) which farmers use as collateral to borrow against to get through the harvest season, are
(E) the collateral against which farmers borrow to get through the harvest season, are
Request Expert Reply:

I don't know how do someone convinced that 'Declining values for farm equipment..' has not been used as 'gerund'. Is it the reason that we need to have a 'doer' after the first COMMA but unfortunately there is no 'doer-subject' after the first comma?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
I don't know how do someone convinced that 'Declining values for farm equipment..' has not been used as 'gerund'. Is it the reason that we need to have a 'doer' after the first COMMA but unfortunately there is no 'doer-subject' after the first comma?
"Declining" modifies "values." There's no other logical interpretation of what's said. So, "declining" cannot be a gerund or the sentence subject.
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts