Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 0812:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Sep 1001:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2107:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Posts: 15
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
35% (02:55) correct
65%
(02:49)
wrong
based on 7295
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an integer, and the sum of the 30 decimals is S. The estimated sum of the 30 decimals, E, is defined as follows. Each decimal in T whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer, and each decimal in T whose tenths digits is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer. If 1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even, which of the following is a possible value of E - S ?
I. -16
II. 6
III. 10
A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III
OG 2019 PS01648
I. -16
II. 6
III. 10
A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III
OG 2019 PS01648
If this question felt shaky,
try an adaptive mini quiz of similar problems in
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →. Free plan gives 5 questions per day.
shamanth25
This is how I would solve it:
Even tenth digit - Round up - 10 numbers
Odd tenth digit - Round down - 20 numbers
E - S can take many values so how do we figure which ones it cannot take? We need to find the range of E - S - the minimum value it can take and the maximum value it can take.
Minimum value of E - S => E is much less than S. How do we make E much less than S?
By doing 2 things:
1. When I round up, the difference between actual and estimate should be little. Say the numbers are something like 3.8999999 (very close to 3.9) and they will be rounded up to 4 i.e. the estimate gains 0.1 per number. Since there are 10 even tenth digit numbers, the estimate will be apprx .1*10 = 1 more than actual
2. When I round down, the difference between actual and estimate should be huge. Say the numbers are something like 3.999999 (very close to 4) and they will be rounded down to 3 i.e. the estimate loses apprx 1 per number. Since there are 20 such numbers, the estimate is 1*20 = 20 less than actual.
Overall, the estimate will be apprx 20 - 1 = 19 less than actual
E - S = -19
Maximum value of E - S => E is much greater than S. How do we make E much greater than S?
By doing 2 things:
1. When we round up, the difference between actual and estimate should be very high. Say the numbers are something like 3.000001 (very close to 3) and they will be rounded up to 4 i.e. the estimate gains 1 per number. Since there are 10 even tenth digit numbers, the estimate will be apprx 1*10 = 10 more than actual
2. When we round down, the difference between actual and estimate should be very little. Say the numbers are 3.1. They will be rounded down to 3 i.e. the estimate loses apprx 0.1 per number. Since there are 20 such numbers, the estimate is 0.1*20 = 2 less than actual.
Maximum value of E - S = 10 - 2 = 8
So 10 cannot be the value of E - S.
Discussed in my blog post here: https://anaprep.com/number-properties-m ... ategies-i/
_________________
-
Start FREE with selected GMAT/EA Content upon registration at anaprep.com
YouTube Channel: karishma.anaprep
Start FREE with selected GMAT/EA Content upon registration at anaprep.com
YouTube Channel: karishma.anaprep
RonPurewal
Expert
Tutor
Joined: 15 Nov 2013
Last visit: 12 Aug 2026
Posts: 252
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90 
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an integer, and the sum of the 30 decimals is S. The estimated sum of the 30 decimals, E, is defined as follows. Each decimal in T whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer, and each decimal in T whose tenths digits is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer. If 1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even, which of the following is a possible value of E - S ?
I. -16
II. 6
III. 10
A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III
Ok, so I don't normally post here, but one of my private tutoring students pointed me to this thread.
So yeah, there are a lot of words in this problem, and it looks complicated. And if you actually start thinking about "E" and "S" separately -- as most people on this thread seem to be doing -- then it becomes quite complicated indeed.
But ... we don't care about E, and we don't care about S. We care about E - S. That's a HUGE difference. (Analogy: I drive my car 54 miles. Do you know the starting odometer mileage? Nope. Do you know the ending odometer mileage? Nope. Do you know the difference between them? Yep, 54 miles.)
What affects E - S? To figure that out, temporarily forget that there are 30 numbers, and pretend there's just 1 number.
* If the number is rounded up, then E - S is positive. It's the amount by which the number is rounded up. (If you round 14.87 up to 15, then E - S is 0.13.)
* If the number is rounded down, then E - S is negative. It's the amount by which the number is rounded down. (If you round 14.77 down to 14, then E - S is -0.77.)
Thinking this way, we can see that it's a waste of time to consider the "integer part" at all. If you round 14.87 up to 15, or 99.87 up to 100, or anything point 87 up to the next integer, you're still looking at +0.13.
Now that we know that, things are more transparent.
* 10 numbers are rounded up.
The most by which they can be rounded up is just barely less than 1 each (if you start with x.00001 type thing).
The least by which they can be rounded up is just barely more than 0.1 each (if you start with x.89999 type thing).
* 20 numbers are rounded down.
The most by which they can be rounded down is just barely less than 1 each (if you start with x.99999 type thing).
The least by which they can be rounded down is 0.1 each (if you start with x.1).
To make E - S as big as possible, make the positive contributions as big as possible: 10 * (approximately +1) = approximately +10. Make the negative contributions as small as possible: 20 * -0.1 = -2. So, the maximum value of E - S is somewhere around 8.
To make E - S as small as possible, make the positive contributions as small as possible: 10 * (approximately 0.1) = approximately +1. Make the negative contributions as big as possible: 20 * (approximately 1) = approximately -20. So, the minimum value of E - S is somewhere around -19.
There you go.
The point here is that you should think about whatever the problem actually asks you for. In those terms, it sounds stupidly simple, but look at what's happening in this thread -- everyone is thinking separately about E and S, even though we only care about E - S. (Think about the odometer.) Oops.
Focus!
This idea is even more important on data sufficiency problems. (If a data sufficiency problem asks for something minus something else, and you try to find the individual values of "something" and "something else" rather than just finding the difference, you're practically certain to get the problem wrong, even if your math is all correct.)
--
Ron Purewal
ManhattanGMAT
Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
I. -16
II. 6
III. 10
A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III
Ok, so I don't normally post here, but one of my private tutoring students pointed me to this thread.
So yeah, there are a lot of words in this problem, and it looks complicated. And if you actually start thinking about "E" and "S" separately -- as most people on this thread seem to be doing -- then it becomes quite complicated indeed.
But ... we don't care about E, and we don't care about S. We care about E - S. That's a HUGE difference. (Analogy: I drive my car 54 miles. Do you know the starting odometer mileage? Nope. Do you know the ending odometer mileage? Nope. Do you know the difference between them? Yep, 54 miles.)
What affects E - S? To figure that out, temporarily forget that there are 30 numbers, and pretend there's just 1 number.
* If the number is rounded up, then E - S is positive. It's the amount by which the number is rounded up. (If you round 14.87 up to 15, then E - S is 0.13.)
* If the number is rounded down, then E - S is negative. It's the amount by which the number is rounded down. (If you round 14.77 down to 14, then E - S is -0.77.)
Thinking this way, we can see that it's a waste of time to consider the "integer part" at all. If you round 14.87 up to 15, or 99.87 up to 100, or anything point 87 up to the next integer, you're still looking at +0.13.
Now that we know that, things are more transparent.
* 10 numbers are rounded up.
The most by which they can be rounded up is just barely less than 1 each (if you start with x.00001 type thing).
The least by which they can be rounded up is just barely more than 0.1 each (if you start with x.89999 type thing).
* 20 numbers are rounded down.
The most by which they can be rounded down is just barely less than 1 each (if you start with x.99999 type thing).
The least by which they can be rounded down is 0.1 each (if you start with x.1).
To make E - S as big as possible, make the positive contributions as big as possible: 10 * (approximately +1) = approximately +10. Make the negative contributions as small as possible: 20 * -0.1 = -2. So, the maximum value of E - S is somewhere around 8.
To make E - S as small as possible, make the positive contributions as small as possible: 10 * (approximately 0.1) = approximately +1. Make the negative contributions as big as possible: 20 * (approximately 1) = approximately -20. So, the minimum value of E - S is somewhere around -19.
There you go.
The point here is that you should think about whatever the problem actually asks you for. In those terms, it sounds stupidly simple, but look at what's happening in this thread -- everyone is thinking separately about E and S, even though we only care about E - S. (Think about the odometer.) Oops.
Focus!
This idea is even more important on data sufficiency problems. (If a data sufficiency problem asks for something minus something else, and you try to find the individual values of "something" and "something else" rather than just finding the difference, you're practically certain to get the problem wrong, even if your math is all correct.)
--
Ron Purewal
ManhattanGMAT
Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
IMO, the best solution is shown by M Dabral of GMAT Quantum in one of its video explanations.
Here is the link: https://www.gmatquantum.com/og13/218-pro ... ition.html
Although NOT most of GMAT Quantum's video explanations/solutions are up to the par, I found that this one along with some others (e.g., PS 178) is the best video explanation floating out there in the internet.
Here is the link: https://www.gmatquantum.com/og13/218-pro ... ition.html
Although NOT most of GMAT Quantum's video explanations/solutions are up to the par, I found that this one along with some others (e.g., PS 178) is the best video explanation floating out there in the internet.
souvik101990
Expert
Alum
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 15 Aug 2026
Posts: 4,309
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert reply
Assume T = (1.a, 1.b,...etc) All units equal 1.xx.
E = 40 (due to rounding of ten even and 20 odd)
S max = 30 + 10(.8) + 20(.9) = 56
S min = 30 + 10(.2) + 20(.1) = 34
E-S min = 40 - 56 = -16
E-S max = 40 - 34 = 6
Thus, the min/max of E is -16 and 6, so I , II apply.
For (III. 10) to be true, S min/max in our equation above needs to equal 30. This is impossible since the question states T consists of 30 positive decimals. Therefore eliminate III.
_________________
E = 40 (due to rounding of ten even and 20 odd)
S max = 30 + 10(.8) + 20(.9) = 56
S min = 30 + 10(.2) + 20(.1) = 34
E-S min = 40 - 56 = -16
E-S max = 40 - 34 = 6
Thus, the min/max of E is -16 and 6, so I , II apply.
For (III. 10) to be true, S min/max in our equation above needs to equal 30. This is impossible since the question states T consists of 30 positive decimals. Therefore eliminate III.
_________________
My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants
My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates
My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?
My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online
My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates
My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?
My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online
JeffTargetTestPrep
Expert
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,973
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert reply
Posts: 2,973
shamanth25
When reading through this question, notice that we are asked which of the following is a POSSIBLE value of E – S. This tells us that we will not be looking for a definite answer here.
We are given that list T has 30 decimals, and that the sum of this list is S.
Next we are given that each decimal whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer and each decimal whose tenths digit is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer.
We are next given that E is the sum of these resulting integers.
Finally, we are given that 1/3 of the decimals in list T have a tenths digit that is even. This this means that 2/3 have a tenths digit that is odd. This means we have 10 decimals with an even tenths digit and 20 decimals with an odd tenths digit.
This is very helpful because we are going to use all this information to create a RANGE of values. We will calculate both the maximum value of E – S and the minimum value of E – S.
Another way to say this is that we want the maximum value of the sum of our estimated value in list T minus the sum of the actual values in list T and also the minimum value of the sum of the estimate values in list T minus the sum of the actual values in list T. Thus, we need to determine the largest estimated values and the smallest estimated values for the decimals in list T.
To do this, let’s go back to some given information:
Each decimal whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer.
Each decimal whose tenths digit is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer.
Let’s first compute the maximum estimated values for the decimals in list T. To get this, we want our 10 decimals with an even tenths digit to be rounded UP as MUCH as possible and we want our 20 decimals with an odds tenths digit to be rounded DOWN as LITTLE as possible. Thus, we can use decimals of 1.2 (for the even tenths place) and 1.1 (for the odd tenths place). Let’s first calculate S, or the sum of the 30 decimals. We know we have 10 decimals of 1.2 and 20 decimals of 1.1, so we can say:
S = 10(1.2) + 20(1.1) = 12 + 22 = 34
Now we can round up 1.2 to the nearest integer and round down 1.1. We see that 1.2 rounded up to the nearest integer is 2, and 1.1 rounded down to the nearest integer is 1. So now we can calculate E, or the sum of the resulting integers. We can say:
E = 10(2) + 20(1) = 20 + 20 = 40
Thus, the maximum value of E – S, in this case, is 40 – 34 = 6.
Let’s next compute the minimum estimated values for the decimals in list T. To get this we want our 10 decimals with an even tenths digit to be rounded UP as LITTLE as possible and we want out 20 decimals with an odds tenths digit to be rounded DOWN as MUCH as possible. Thus, we can use decimals of 1.8 (for the even tenths place) and 1.9 (for the odd tenths place). Let’s first calculate S, or the sum of the 30 decimals. We know we have 10 decimals of 1.2 and 20 decimals of 1.1, so we can say:
S = 10(1.8) + 20(1.9) = 18 + 38 = 56
Now we can round up 1.8 to the nearest integer and round down 1.9 to the nearest integer. 1.8 rounded up to the nearest integer is 2, and 1.9 rounded down to the nearest integer is 1. So now we can calculate E, or the sum of the resulting integers, so we can say:
E = 10(2) + 20(1) = 20 + 20 = 40
Thus, the minimum value of E – S, in this case, is 40 – 56 = -16.
Thus, the possible range of E – S is between -16 and 6, inclusive. We see that I and II fall within this range.
The answer is B.
_________________
Jeffrey Miller | Head of GMAT Instruction |
[email protected]
See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews
Schools: INSEAD Jan '15
Posts: 4
I found the responses in this question very helpful, but I think I found another way to explain it that I can understand better... hopefully someone finds this useful someday.
**
As the question ask for the difference between S and E, the actual "integer" portions are negligible as they will cancel each other out in the minus (-) operation (e.g. 15.9 - 15 = 0.9) . If it helps in understanding, we can also assume that all numbers in the list T are 0.xxxx (as the minus operation cancels the "integer" portion anyway).
Let's recap:
S = Real sum
E = Estimated sum, 10 are rounded up, 20 are rounded down
We can also first establish that there is only one value of E, as we are given in the question that 10 of them WILL be rounded up, and 20 WILL be rounded down. There is no Emax or Emin. To solve for E and assuming that numbers in list T are 0.xxx as per above point,
E = 10 x (T values rounded up) + 20 x (T values rounded down)
= 10 x (0.2) + 20 x (0.9) --> doesnt matter what the values are, they can be any even / odd combinations at the tenth
= 10 x (1) + 20 x (0), after performing round up/down operations
= 10
There are however Smax and Smin, as these are possible ranges prior to the round up/down operations.
Smax = 10 x (maximum even tenth) + 20 x (maximum odd tenth)
= 10 x (0.8) + 20 x (0.9)
= 8 + 18
= 26
Smin = 10 x (minimum even tenth) + 20 x (minimum odd tenth)
= 10 x (0.2) + 20 x (0.1)
= 2 + 2
= 4
The largest range of E - S is therefore
E - Smin = 10 - 4
= -6
The lowest range of E - S is therefore
E - Smax = 10 - 26
= -16
Unlike some contributions here, I found it absolutely necessary to solve for E and S. The previous solution by RonPurewal looks sound, but when you look closer, it assumes that E - S = (10 round up values - 20 round down values), which is not true, and therefore the answers are not exactly to the range given by the question. The full algebraic equation of his solution should have been:
- Largest range of E - S = (10x round up + 20x round down) - (10x Minimum round up + 20x minimum round down)
- Lowest range of E - S = (10x round up + 20x round down) - (10x Maximum round up + 20x maximum round down)
Essentially calling for the need to resolve for E and S individually, eventually.
I apolgise if I sound rude - its 130am in the morning and I had just spent an hour just analyzing just this question alone, and my heart hurts! Irregardless, I have learn plenty just by analyzing everyone's solution to help me arrive to this way of looking into this problem. Many thanks!
**
As the question ask for the difference between S and E, the actual "integer" portions are negligible as they will cancel each other out in the minus (-) operation (e.g. 15.9 - 15 = 0.9) . If it helps in understanding, we can also assume that all numbers in the list T are 0.xxxx (as the minus operation cancels the "integer" portion anyway).
Let's recap:
S = Real sum
E = Estimated sum, 10 are rounded up, 20 are rounded down
We can also first establish that there is only one value of E, as we are given in the question that 10 of them WILL be rounded up, and 20 WILL be rounded down. There is no Emax or Emin. To solve for E and assuming that numbers in list T are 0.xxx as per above point,
E = 10 x (T values rounded up) + 20 x (T values rounded down)
= 10 x (0.2) + 20 x (0.9) --> doesnt matter what the values are, they can be any even / odd combinations at the tenth
= 10 x (1) + 20 x (0), after performing round up/down operations
= 10
There are however Smax and Smin, as these are possible ranges prior to the round up/down operations.
Smax = 10 x (maximum even tenth) + 20 x (maximum odd tenth)
= 10 x (0.8) + 20 x (0.9)
= 8 + 18
= 26
Smin = 10 x (minimum even tenth) + 20 x (minimum odd tenth)
= 10 x (0.2) + 20 x (0.1)
= 2 + 2
= 4
The largest range of E - S is therefore
E - Smin = 10 - 4
= -6
The lowest range of E - S is therefore
E - Smax = 10 - 26
= -16
Unlike some contributions here, I found it absolutely necessary to solve for E and S. The previous solution by RonPurewal looks sound, but when you look closer, it assumes that E - S = (10 round up values - 20 round down values), which is not true, and therefore the answers are not exactly to the range given by the question. The full algebraic equation of his solution should have been:
- Largest range of E - S = (10x round up + 20x round down) - (10x Minimum round up + 20x minimum round down)
- Lowest range of E - S = (10x round up + 20x round down) - (10x Maximum round up + 20x maximum round down)
Essentially calling for the need to resolve for E and S individually, eventually.
I apolgise if I sound rude - its 130am in the morning and I had just spent an hour just analyzing just this question alone, and my heart hurts! Irregardless, I have learn plenty just by analyzing everyone's solution to help me arrive to this way of looking into this problem. Many thanks!
Posts: 6,727
shamanth25
Given: 10 of the values must have an EVEN tenths digit, and the remaining 20 values must have an ODD tenths digit.
Let's try to determine the MAXIMUM value of E - S and the MINIMUM value of E - S
Once we do that, we'll know the range of possible values of E - S
IMPORTANT: To make things easier, let's consider decimals in the form 0.something
MAXIMUM value of E - S
In order to MAXIMIZE the value of E - S, we must MINIMIZE the value of S
We can do this by making the decimals with an ODD tenths digit 0.1, and by making the decimals with an EVEN tenths digit 0.01
So List T consists of twenty 0.1's and ten 0.01's
This means S = 20(0.1) + 10(0.01) = 2.1
When we complete our ROUNDING, we get: twenty 0's and ten 1's
So, E = 20(0) + 10(1) = 10
So, the MAXIMUM value of E - S = 10 - 2.1 = 7.9
MINIMUM value of E - S
In order to MINIMIZE the value of E - S, we must MAXIMIZE the value of S
We can do this by making the decimals with an ODD tenths digit 0.99999..., and by making the decimals with an EVEN tenths digit 0.89999...
So List T consists of twenty 0.9999....'s and ten 0.89999....'s
This means S ≈ 20(1) + 10(0.9) ≈ 29
ASIDE: We need not get super crazy about how many 9's we add to our decimals. Let's just look for an APPROXIMATE value.
When we complete our ROUNDING, we get: twenty 0's and ten 1's
So, E = 20(0) + 10(1) = 10
So, the MINIMUM value of E - S = 10 - 29 = -19
So, the value of E - S can range from (approximately) -19 to 7.9
Since -16 and 6 fall within this range, the correct answer is B
Cheers,
Brent
I have not gone through the entire thread and would explain you the best way I can...
Since I am not aware what has been explained earlier, the way and solution I am giving may be NEW or already discussed..
1) there are 30 decimals, NONE of them is an INTEGER..
2) decimals with even TENTHS is moved to upper integer..
which means any decimal .2,.4,.6,.8 moves to 1..
3) decimals with odd TENTHS is moved to lower integer..
which means any decimal .1,.3,.5,.7,.9 moves down to 0..
4) We are NOT concerned with what is to LEFT of decimal as that will get cancelled out in E-S
5) 10 are moving up (1/3 rd even decimals), whereas the other 20 move down
In such Qs, the best way is to look at the least and max values..
so lets take the smallest and biggest even and odd decimals..
EVEN--
smallest-0.2
EFFECT= 10 is moving up But in actual .2*10=2 is already moved up in S..
so effect on E-S= 10-2= +8
Largest-0.8
EFFECT= 10 is moving up But in actual .8*10=8 is already moved up in S..
so effect on E-S= 10-8= +2
ODD--
smallest-0.1
EFFECT= .1*20= 2moved down= -2
Largest-0.9
EFFECT= 0.9*20= 18 moved down = -18..
so now we can take combinations of effect of even and effect of moving down..
even= +2 and +8
odd= -2 and -18..
least (opposite effect)= -18+2=-16
biggest effect= 8-2=6..
so E-S will lie between -16 and 6, both inclusive..
so 10 is not possible
ans B
Hope it helps
_________________
Since I am not aware what has been explained earlier, the way and solution I am giving may be NEW or already discussed..
Lets first take the INFO from the Q--
1) there are 30 decimals, NONE of them is an INTEGER..
2) decimals with even TENTHS is moved to upper integer..
which means any decimal .2,.4,.6,.8 moves to 1..
3) decimals with odd TENTHS is moved to lower integer..
which means any decimal .1,.3,.5,.7,.9 moves down to 0..
4) We are NOT concerned with what is to LEFT of decimal as that will get cancelled out in E-S
5) 10 are moving up (1/3 rd even decimals), whereas the other 20 move down
SOLUTION-
In such Qs, the best way is to look at the least and max values..
so lets take the smallest and biggest even and odd decimals..
EVEN--
smallest-0.2
EFFECT= 10 is moving up But in actual .2*10=2 is already moved up in S..
so effect on E-S= 10-2= +8
Largest-0.8
EFFECT= 10 is moving up But in actual .8*10=8 is already moved up in S..
so effect on E-S= 10-8= +2
ODD--
smallest-0.1
EFFECT= .1*20= 2moved down= -2
Largest-0.9
EFFECT= 0.9*20= 18 moved down = -18..
so now we can take combinations of effect of even and effect of moving down..
even= +2 and +8
odd= -2 and -18..
least (opposite effect)= -18+2=-16
biggest effect= 8-2=6..
so E-S will lie between -16 and 6, both inclusive..
so 10 is not possible
ans B
Hope it helps
_________________
MartyTargetTestPrep
Expert
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,471
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,471
Key point:
1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even.
There are 30 decimals in T. So 10 have even tenths digits and ten have odd tenths digits.
Notice:
When you round down one of the decimals, you are reducing E. So you are reducing E - S.
When you round up one of the decimals, you are increasing E. So you are increasing E - S.
So according to the question we will be rounding up and increasing E ten times and rounding down and reducing E 20 times.
Possible even decimals are .2, .4, .6 and .8. So rounding up adds .8, .6, .4 or .2.
Possible odd decimals are .1, .3, .5, .7 and .9. So rounding down subtracts .1, .3, .5, .7 or .9.
So really the question is can (10 values from the adds list) - (20 values from the subtracts list) equal one of the given answers.
Check the values:
I. -16 is pretty low. So to get it we need to do some serious subtraction and not much addition.
Let's try minimizing E by minimizing the addition, by choosing the smallest number from the adds list, and maximizing the subtraction, by choosing the largest number from the subtracts list.
(10 x .2) - (20 x .9) = 2 - 18 = -16
Value I works.
II. 6 is between -16 and 10. So I am going to skip it for now. If 10 works, I think 6 is going to as well.
III. 10 is pretty high. So let's maximize the addition and minimize the subtraction.
(10 x .8) - (20 x .1) = 8 - 2 = 6.
So 10 does not work, but 6 does.
The correct answer is .
_________________
1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even.
There are 30 decimals in T. So 10 have even tenths digits and ten have odd tenths digits.
Notice:
When you round down one of the decimals, you are reducing E. So you are reducing E - S.
When you round up one of the decimals, you are increasing E. So you are increasing E - S.
So according to the question we will be rounding up and increasing E ten times and rounding down and reducing E 20 times.
Possible even decimals are .2, .4, .6 and .8. So rounding up adds .8, .6, .4 or .2.
Possible odd decimals are .1, .3, .5, .7 and .9. So rounding down subtracts .1, .3, .5, .7 or .9.
So really the question is can (10 values from the adds list) - (20 values from the subtracts list) equal one of the given answers.
Check the values:
I. -16 is pretty low. So to get it we need to do some serious subtraction and not much addition.
Let's try minimizing E by minimizing the addition, by choosing the smallest number from the adds list, and maximizing the subtraction, by choosing the largest number from the subtracts list.
(10 x .2) - (20 x .9) = 2 - 18 = -16
Value I works.
II. 6 is between -16 and 10. So I am going to skip it for now. If 10 works, I think 6 is going to as well.
III. 10 is pretty high. So let's maximize the addition and minimize the subtraction.
(10 x .8) - (20 x .1) = 8 - 2 = 6.
So 10 does not work, but 6 does.
The correct answer is .
_________________
Marty Murray | Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews
shamanth25
Official Explanation:
Since 1/3 of the 30 decimals in T have an even tenths digit, it follows that 1/3*(30)=10 decimals in T have an even tenths digit. Let \(T_E\) represent the list of these 10 decimals, let \(S_E\) represent the sum of all 10 decimals in \(T_E\), and let \(E_E\) represent the estimated sum of all 10 decimals in \(T_E\) after rounding. The remaining 20 decimals in T have an odd tenths digit. Let \(T_O\) represent the list of these 20 remaining decimals, let \(S_O\) represent the sum of all 20 decimals in \(T_O\), and let \(E_O\) represent the estimated sum of all 20 decimals in \(T_O\) after rounding. Note that \(E = E_E + E_O\) and \(S = S_E + S_O\) and hence \(E − S = (E_E + E_O) − (S_E + S_O) = (E_E − S_E) + (E_O − S_O)\).
The least values of \(E_E − S_E\) occur at the extreme where each decimal in TE has tenths digit 8. Here, the difference between the rounded integer and the original decimal is greater than 0.1. (For example, the difference between the integer 15 and 14.899 that has been rounded to 15 is 0.101.) Hence, \(E_E − S_E > 10(0.1) = 1\). The greatest values of \(E_E − S_E\) occur at the other extreme, where each decimal in \(T_E\) has tenths digit 0. Here, the difference between the rounded integer and the original decimal is less than 1. (For example, the difference between the integer 15 and 14.001 that has been rounded to 15 is 0.999.) Hence, EE − SE < 10(1) = 10. Thus, \(1 < E_E − S_E < 10\).
Similarly, the least values of EO − SO occur at the extreme where each decimal in TO has tenths digit 9. Here, the difference between the rounded integer and the original decimal is greater than −1. (For example, the difference between the integer 14 and 14.999 that has been rounded to 14 is −0.999.) Hence EO − SO > 20(−1) = −20. The greatest values of EO − SO occur at the other extreme where each decimal in TO has tenths digit 1. Here, the difference between the rounded integer and the original decimal is less than or equal to −0.1. (For example, the difference between the integer 14 and 14.1 that has been rounded to 14 is −0.1.) Hence, \(E_O − S_O ≤ 20(−0.1) = −2\). Thus, \(−20 < E_O − S_O ≤ −2\).
Adding the inequalities \(1 < E_E − S_E < 10\) and \(−20 < E_O − S_O ≤ −2\) gives \(−19 < (E_E − S_E) + (E_O − S_O) < 8\). Therefore, \(−19 < (E_E + E_O) − (S_E + S_O) < 8\) and \(−19 < E − S < 8\). Thus, of the values −16, 6, and 10 for E − S, only −16 and 6 are possible.
Note that if T contains 10 repetitions of the decimal 1.8 and 20 repetitions of the decimal 1.9, \(S = 10(1.8) + 20(1.9) = 18 + 38 = 56\), \(E = 10(2) + 20(1) = 40\), and \(E − S = 40 − 56 = −16\). Also, if T contains 10 repetitions of the decimal 1.2 and 20 repetitions of the decimal 1.1, \(S = 10(1.2) + 20(1.1) = 12 + 22 = 34\), \(E = 10(2) + 20(1) = 40\), and \(E − S = 40 − 34 = 6\).
Answer: B.
_________________
New to the GMAT Club?
- • Questions: Question Bank | Bunuel's Signature Collection
• Tests: GMAT Club Tests | Forum Quiz
• Guides: Quantitative | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension | Ultimate Quant Guide | All You Need for Quant
• Rules: Quantitative | Verbal
Posts: 4,849
The list T consists of 30 positive decimals, of which 10 decimals (1/3rd of the 30 decimals) have their tenths place as an even digit and the remaining 20 decimals (remaining 2/3rd of the 30 decimals) have their tenths place as an odd digit.
Let us recall that, if the general representation of a decimal is
0.pqrst…….,
p = tenths place, q = hundredths place, r = thousandths place and so on.
Note: Remember that the decimal can also be 1.pqrst or 2.pqrst and so on.
In our case, we will have to focus on the tenth’s place because it is based on this that we are rounding off the decimal, either to a higher integral value or to a lower integral value.
For example, if the decimal is 0.2qrst…, then this has to be rounded up to the next higher integer that is 1; if the decimal is 1.2qrst…., then this has to be rounded up to the next higher integer, 2; and so on. I hope this is clear.
Similarly, if the decimal is 0.1qrst….., then this has to be rounded down to the next lower integer, which in this case is obviously ZERO; if the decimal is 1.1qrst…., then this has to be rounded down to the next lower integer, 1; and so on. I hope this is clear as well.
Now, let us address the actual problem at hand. Since we are trying to find out the impossible values of E-S, which is a difference of two sums, it is a good idea to find out the range of values that E-S can possibly take, which will help us figure out which value is not possible.
The minimum value of E-S can be obtained by making E as small as possible while making S as big as possible. S can be made as large as possible by taking the tenth’s place as a bigger digit like 8 or 9 and the contrary is true to make is as small as possible.
The following tables should make it clearer:
Kindly go through the pic attached.
Let us compute all possible values of S and E from the table above by taking different combinations:
If S = 0.1 +2 = 2.1 and E = 10 + 0 = 10, then E-S = 8.
If S= 0.1 + 19.8 = 19.9 and E = 10 + 0, then, E –S = -9.9
If S = 8.9 + 2 = 11.9 and E = 10 +0 = 10, then, E – S = -1.9
If S = 8.9 + 19.8 = 28.7 and E = 10 + 0, then E = -18.7
Therefore, the range of values is between -18 and 8. Hence, 10 is not a possible value for E-S.
An important point that you have to note here is the fact that I have taken the smallest possible positive decimal in 0.01 and therefore, with decimals like 1.01 or 1.21, the upper range of 8 will only reduce, but will never increase beyond 8 and hence, we can safely say that 10 is definitely not a possible option
Option B is the answer.
Let us recall that, if the general representation of a decimal is
0.pqrst…….,
p = tenths place, q = hundredths place, r = thousandths place and so on.
Note: Remember that the decimal can also be 1.pqrst or 2.pqrst and so on.
In our case, we will have to focus on the tenth’s place because it is based on this that we are rounding off the decimal, either to a higher integral value or to a lower integral value.
For example, if the decimal is 0.2qrst…, then this has to be rounded up to the next higher integer that is 1; if the decimal is 1.2qrst…., then this has to be rounded up to the next higher integer, 2; and so on. I hope this is clear.
Similarly, if the decimal is 0.1qrst….., then this has to be rounded down to the next lower integer, which in this case is obviously ZERO; if the decimal is 1.1qrst…., then this has to be rounded down to the next lower integer, 1; and so on. I hope this is clear as well.
Now, let us address the actual problem at hand. Since we are trying to find out the impossible values of E-S, which is a difference of two sums, it is a good idea to find out the range of values that E-S can possibly take, which will help us figure out which value is not possible.
The minimum value of E-S can be obtained by making E as small as possible while making S as big as possible. S can be made as large as possible by taking the tenth’s place as a bigger digit like 8 or 9 and the contrary is true to make is as small as possible.
The following tables should make it clearer:
Kindly go through the pic attached.
Let us compute all possible values of S and E from the table above by taking different combinations:
If S = 0.1 +2 = 2.1 and E = 10 + 0 = 10, then E-S = 8.
If S= 0.1 + 19.8 = 19.9 and E = 10 + 0, then, E –S = -9.9
If S = 8.9 + 2 = 11.9 and E = 10 +0 = 10, then, E – S = -1.9
If S = 8.9 + 19.8 = 28.7 and E = 10 + 0, then E = -18.7
Therefore, the range of values is between -18 and 8. Hence, 10 is not a possible value for E-S.
An important point that you have to note here is the fact that I have taken the smallest possible positive decimal in 0.01 and therefore, with decimals like 1.01 or 1.21, the upper range of 8 will only reduce, but will never increase beyond 8 and hence, we can safely say that 10 is definitely not a possible option
Option B is the answer.
Attachments
File comment: tenth digit is odd
2.JPG [ 96.87 KiB | Viewed 72720 times ]
File comment: Tenth digit is even
1.JPG [ 60.27 KiB | Viewed 72724 times ]
avigutman
Expert
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 27 Jun 2026
Posts: 1,285
Location: Canada
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert reply
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
General Discussion
vinayvedula
Joined: 10 Jan 2014
Last visit: 26 Jul 2014
Posts: 4
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT Date: 12-06-2014
GPA: 3.61
WE:Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 4
The two extremes can be calculated as:
1. Highest tenths place 0.9 and 0.8
so E = S +(10*0.2 - 20*0.9) >>>> Change from 0.1 to 1 is 0.2(increase) & 0.9 to 0 is 0.9(decreased)
= S +(2-18)
E-S = -16
2. Lowest tenths place 0.1 & 0.2 >>>> Change from 0.2 to 1 is 0.8 & 0.1 to 0 is 0.1
so E = S+(10*0.8 - 20*.2)
E -S = (8-2)
E-S = 6
Hence answer is B!!
1. Highest tenths place 0.9 and 0.8
so E = S +(10*0.2 - 20*0.9) >>>> Change from 0.1 to 1 is 0.2(increase) & 0.9 to 0 is 0.9(decreased)
= S +(2-18)
E-S = -16
2. Lowest tenths place 0.1 & 0.2 >>>> Change from 0.2 to 1 is 0.8 & 0.1 to 0 is 0.1
so E = S+(10*0.8 - 20*.2)
E -S = (8-2)
E-S = 6
Hence answer is B!!
shamanth25
At first glance question may look difficult but in reality it can be solved in 2 mins ..
\(E_m_a_x = S + ( 20*(-0.1) + 10*0.8) = S+6\) so E-S=6
\(E_m_i_n = S + ( 20*(-0.9) + 10*0.2) = S-16\) so E-S=-16
Answer B.
BrainLab
Current Student
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 26 Jan 2025
Posts: 341
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: WHU MBA"20 (A$)
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.7
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
We have whole numbers in the answer choices, so we don't need to go through all the 3,0000001 cases.. We limit here to the tenth !
Round Up -Even
Max: 3,2 --> 4 so we get 0,8*10=8
Min: 3,8 --> 4 so we get 0,2*10=2
Round down - Odd
Max: 3,9 --> 3 so we get -0,9*20=-18
Min: 3,1 --> 3 so we get -0,1*20=-2
Now we can manipulate those numbers:
I. -16 --> -18 + 2 = -16 OK
II. 6 --> -2 + 8 = 6 OK
III. 10 X You can not get 10 because the max positive Value is 8, Hence, correct answer is (B)
Round Up -Even
Max: 3,2 --> 4 so we get 0,8*10=8
Min: 3,8 --> 4 so we get 0,2*10=2
Round down - Odd
Max: 3,9 --> 3 so we get -0,9*20=-18
Min: 3,1 --> 3 so we get -0,1*20=-2
Now we can manipulate those numbers:
I. -16 --> -18 + 2 = -16 OK
II. 6 --> -2 + 8 = 6 OK
III. 10 X You can not get 10 because the max positive Value is 8, Hence, correct answer is (B)
Note that the only thing that effects the difference E-S are the possible values of E, as S is the set of stationary fixed values. Thus, the max and min value changes of E are all that we care about.
Max
If the true number, S, of even tenths decimals end in X.0000000001, the even decimals in E would get rounded up to effectively +1 more, or +1*10=+10 away from the true value of S.
If the true number, S, of odd tenths decimals end in X.100000, the odd decimals in E would each lose -.1, or -0.1*20= -2 from the true value of S.
Net max value for E-S = 8
Min
If the true number, S, of even tenths decimals end in X..89999999, the even decimals in E would get rounded up to effectively +0.1 more, or +0.1*10=+1 away from the true value of S.
If the true number, S, of odd tenths decimals end in X.999999999, the odd decimals in E would each effectively move -1, or -1*20= -20 from the true value of S.
Net min value of E-S = -19
Thus, the possible range of E-S values is -19 to 8.
Max
If the true number, S, of even tenths decimals end in X.0000000001, the even decimals in E would get rounded up to effectively +1 more, or +1*10=+10 away from the true value of S.
If the true number, S, of odd tenths decimals end in X.100000, the odd decimals in E would each lose -.1, or -0.1*20= -2 from the true value of S.
Net max value for E-S = 8
Min
If the true number, S, of even tenths decimals end in X..89999999, the even decimals in E would get rounded up to effectively +0.1 more, or +0.1*10=+1 away from the true value of S.
If the true number, S, of odd tenths decimals end in X.999999999, the odd decimals in E would each effectively move -1, or -1*20= -20 from the true value of S.
Net min value of E-S = -19
Thus, the possible range of E-S values is -19 to 8.
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,315
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Dont know what's the issue here but I can see atleast 3 good solutions with Karishma's the best one , IMO
Refer to the posts : https://gmatclub.com/forum/list-t-consis ... l#p1081121
Ron Purewal's: https://gmatclub.com/forum/list-t-consis ... l#p1292975
https://gmatclub.com/forum/list-t-consis ... l#p1090856
The concepts tested here are max/min , rounding of decimals and number properties (odd/even). All these word problems become complicated when you do not break the problem down into manageable chunks.
To make the calculations simpler, you can assume that the decimals are
0.1 and 0.2 such that 0.2 0.2 0.2 .... 10 times and 0.1 0.1 0.1 .....20 times.
Thus, S = 0.2*10+0.1*20 = 4 and E = 1*10+0 = 10. Thus, E-S = 6. You will see that this is the most you will get for E-S.
Now, consider the other end of the spectrum: 0.8 0.8 0.8 ....10 times and 0.9 0.9 0.9 ...20 times
Thus, S = 0.8*10+20*0.9 = 26 and E = 1*10+0=10, Thus E-S = -16. Whatever values you play with, you will never get to 10.
Look at the solutions above and let me know if you still have questions. If you do, mention the doubt/question as well.
Hope this helps.
Refer to the posts : https://gmatclub.com/forum/list-t-consis ... l#p1081121
Ron Purewal's: https://gmatclub.com/forum/list-t-consis ... l#p1292975
https://gmatclub.com/forum/list-t-consis ... l#p1090856
The concepts tested here are max/min , rounding of decimals and number properties (odd/even). All these word problems become complicated when you do not break the problem down into manageable chunks.
To make the calculations simpler, you can assume that the decimals are
0.1 and 0.2 such that 0.2 0.2 0.2 .... 10 times and 0.1 0.1 0.1 .....20 times.
Thus, S = 0.2*10+0.1*20 = 4 and E = 1*10+0 = 10. Thus, E-S = 6. You will see that this is the most you will get for E-S.
Now, consider the other end of the spectrum: 0.8 0.8 0.8 ....10 times and 0.9 0.9 0.9 ...20 times
Thus, S = 0.8*10+20*0.9 = 26 and E = 1*10+0=10, Thus E-S = -16. Whatever values you play with, you will never get to 10.
Look at the solutions above and let me know if you still have questions. If you do, mention the doubt/question as well.
Hope this helps.
n1+n2+n3...n30 = S
Estimated Value = E
*To maximize one quantity, minimize the others
To minimize one quantity, maximize the others*
(E-S) max occurs when gain from rounding off is maximum . Therefore we assume each even number in Set T to have tenths digit as 2. And we minimize the loss from rounding off by assuming odd numbers in set T to have tenths digit 1. Therefore gain = (0.8*10) & loss = (0.1*20). Therefore 8-2 = 6
So option II is possible whereas option III is not.
(E-S)min occurs when you reverse the conditions , i.e. minimise gain and maximise loss. Therefore even digits have tenths digit 8 whereas odd numbers have tenths digit 9. Therefore gain = (0.2*10) & loss = (0.9*20). Therefore 2-18 = -16
So option I is feasible.
Estimated Value = E
*To maximize one quantity, minimize the others
To minimize one quantity, maximize the others*
(E-S) max occurs when gain from rounding off is maximum . Therefore we assume each even number in Set T to have tenths digit as 2. And we minimize the loss from rounding off by assuming odd numbers in set T to have tenths digit 1. Therefore gain = (0.8*10) & loss = (0.1*20). Therefore 8-2 = 6
So option II is possible whereas option III is not.
(E-S)min occurs when you reverse the conditions , i.e. minimise gain and maximise loss. Therefore even digits have tenths digit 8 whereas odd numbers have tenths digit 9. Therefore gain = (0.2*10) & loss = (0.9*20). Therefore 2-18 = -16
So option I is feasible.
Posts: 577
shamanth25
1.Consider the extreme cases so that you know the maximum and minimum values possible and therefore can find the range. of E-S.
2. In the case of the tenths digits even, maximum of just less than 10 can be gained.
3. In the case of tenths digits odd, maximum of just less than 20 can be lost i.e, -20
4. E-S can be in the range from just numerically less than -20 to just less than 10.
So B is the answer
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Moderator:
Announcements
Tuck at Dartmouth
AI at Dartmouth Tuck: How the School Is Preparing Leaders for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.