daagh
Even though the homogeneity of the genetic record of the world's population, which is said to be consistent between individuals to one part in ten thousand, has been explained by environmental factors, it may be equally accounted for by the theory of convergent evolution.
(A) Even though the homogeneity of the genetic record of the world's population, which is said to be consistent between individuals to one part in ten thousand, has been explained by environmental factors, it may be equally accounted for by the theory of convergent evolution.
(B) Although said to be consistent between individuals to one part in ten thousand, the homogeneity of the genetic record of the world's population has been explained by environmental factors and may be equally accounted for by the theory of convergent evolution.
(C) Equally accounted for by the theory of convergent evolution, the homogeneity of the genetic record of the world's population, which is said to be consistent between individuals to one part in ten thousand, has been explained by environmental factors.
(D) Consistent between individuals to one part in ten thousand, the homogeneity of the genetic record of the world's population, even though explained by environmental factors, but is accounted for by the theory of convergent evolution.
(E) While the homogeneity of the genetic record of the world's population is said to be consistent between individuals to one part in ten thousand, it has been explained by environmental factors, and may be equally accounted for by the theory of convergent evolution.
ExplanationCreating a filter: we can take our time reading the somewhat lengthy underlined sentence. Assuming we identify no error, we can move on to choice (B).
Finding objective defects: choice (B) distorts the intended meaning. The "consistent to one part in ten thousand" part is not being disputed, as (B) implies; it's just providing information about the subject the imaginary author is discussing. Choice (C) also distorts the point. The "convergent evolution" piece is the point of the sentence, but (C) sticks it at the beginning as if that point were a given. The main point of a sentence should, generally, reside in its independent clause. Choice (C) is out. Choice (D) more or less expresses the intended meaning, but it has a grammatical error; the insertion of the conjunction "but" makes it a non-sentence because it creates a clause that has a verb, "is accounted for," with no grammatical subject. Choice (D) is out. Choice (E) distorts the intended meaning in a way similar to (B). The correct answer is (A).