Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 17 Jul 2019, 04:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2014, 16:49
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.



-Emp. theft = lost revenue
-piece by piece consumption (slow)
C: losses are greatly overstated

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold --- strengthens; if workers are eating the damaged inventory there wouldn't be losses.
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees --- weakens; if employees eat candy that could be sold then there are losses b/c revenue is being lost as the quantities for sale are suppressed. Best so far!
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for. --- passage makes note of slow pace at which candy is eaten. Therefore, even if "select" employees are responsible for all of the damage they're not eating at a fast enough pace. Neither here nor there
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest. --- at busy season less inventory = greater losses. Strengthen!
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company. --- despite being a small portion it could still be a large portion of potential sales. Irrelevant.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 52
Schools: NTU '16
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2014, 23:32
How does A strengthen? Please explain. I believe A weakens
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Dec 2015
Posts: 16
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2016, 09:35
(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold - Strengthen's the argument
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees - Could be an answer
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for. - Strengthen's the argument
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest - Could be an answer
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company - Strengthen's the argument

Out of B and D, will go for B since D only talks about production outputs and effect of production outputs on sales has not been given in the argument.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4765
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2019, 17:57
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee   [#permalink] 04 Jan 2019, 17:57

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne