GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Aug 2018, 00:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

#Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5120
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
#Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2015, 07:47
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:33) correct 62% (01:45) wrong based on 200 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach pier got sick from consuming locally fished hermit crabs, the Rotunda Beach city authorities posted signs cautioning against the consumption of the crabs. Tests revealed that the crabs were high in prestic acid, a dangerous chemical. But a marked decline in the number of goldfish found by the beach has led to the removal of the warning signs.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the removal of the signs?

A. Goldfish found off Rotunda Beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid.

B. The amount of prestic acid produced by an individual goldfish has a direct positive correlation with the density of the goldfish population in that goldfish’s immediate vicinity.

C. Goldfish consume various parasites that often contain prestic acid.

D. Rotunda Beach is notoriously polluted.

E. Goldfish would not be able to inhabit the waters off Rotunda Beach if those waters were not saturated with a precise mixture of acids, including prestic acid

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 878
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: #Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2015, 08:39
Please advise if ‘E’ is the answer.

Reduction of Goldfish led removal of the signs. That means reduction in Goldfish has something to do with the reduction in prestic acid. If Goldfish needs prestic acid for survival then reduction of it will lead to decline in Goldfish population. And when there is less prestic acid in water, crabs will also have less prestic acid and could be recommended for consumption. This is mentioned in choice ‘E’
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 610 Q50 V23
GPA: 3.82
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
#Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2015, 09:02
souvik101990 wrote:
After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach pier got sick from consuming locally fished hermit crabs, the Rotunda Beach city authorities posted signs cautioning against the consumption of the crabs. Tests revealed that the crabs were high in prestic acid, a dangerous chemical. But a marked decline in the number of goldfish found by the beach has led to the removal of the warning signs.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the removal of the signs?

A. Goldfish found off Rotunda Beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid.

B. The amount of prestic acid produced by an individual goldfish has a direct positive correlation with the density of the goldfish population in that goldfish’s immediate vicinity.

C. Goldfish consume various parasites that often contain prestic acid.

D. Rotunda Beach is notoriously polluted.

E. Goldfish would not be able to inhabit the waters off Rotunda Beach if those waters were not saturated with a precise mixture of acids, including prestic acid



according to me answer is



I was confused between E and B and A.

A. Goldfish found off Rotunda Beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid. Here, Goldfish OFF the beach not BY the beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid. So if the population has gone down. Crabs wont excrete but they would still contain prestic acid. So A is out

E. Goldfish would not be able to inhabit the waters off Rotunda Beach if those waters were not saturated with a precise mixture of acids, including prestic acid Hmm this one felt tricky. Okay suppose the mixture contains 5% P acid. Now, there is 4% P acid and G fish can't survive without 5% P acid, BUT Acid still remains in the water for the crabs to intake, hence E is out.

B. The amount of prestic acid produced by an individual goldfish has a direct positive correlation with the density of the goldfish population in that goldfish’s immediate vicinity. Now, if this correlation is correct, i.e. Amt of P acid ---> dependent on amt/density of pop of G fish, then Less G ---> Less P. So B seems legit

OA =
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Status: One Last Shot !!!
Joined: 04 May 2014
Posts: 245
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V32
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V35
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: #Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2015, 10:16
A. Goldfish found off Rotunda Beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid.
Its only telling us that Goldfish is on our side. It helps in reducing prestic acid's level in the crabs. But why should the warning signs be removed?

B. The amount of prestic acid produced by an individual goldfish has a direct positive correlation with the density of the goldfish population in that goldfish’s immediate vicinity.
This doesnt talk about crabs at all. Though Goldfish is important, we need to assure that crabs are not consumed. Doesn't help

C. Goldfish consume various parasites that often contain prestic acid.
This makes things worse! If this is the case, Goldfish can eat as many crabs as it wants now. As a result it should grow in number.

D. Rotunda Beach is notoriously polluted.
So what? Way out of scope!

E. Goldfish would not be able to inhabit the waters off Rotunda Beach if those waters were not saturated with a precise mixture of acids, including prestic acid
This makes sense.
Please note- precise mixture of acids is needed for the Goldfish to survive.
Now, Since the warning signs were put up, the levels of prestic acid must have gone up because of the unchallenged growth of crabs, thereby going beyond whats needed by our Goldfish. So, remove the warning so that the crabs are again hunted and level of prestic acid comes down.

Hence, ill go with E.

But hold on! We are saving Goldfish at the expense of our fishermen's health!! :o
_________________

One Kudos for an everlasting piece of knowledge is not a bad deal at all... :thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.
-Mark Twain

Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 750
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: #Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2015, 10:43
The argument: consuming hermit crabs makes people got sick => authorities posted warning sign
Hermit crab excrete prestic acid which is toxic to human
The conclusion: Decline number of GF found off the beach => remove sign of caution

Scope: Hermit crab, prestic acid need connect to reasons of decline of GF

souvik101990 wrote:
After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach pier got sick from consuming locally fished hermit crabs, the Rotunda Beach city authorities posted signs cautioning against the consumption of the crabs. Tests revealed that the crabs were high in prestic acid, a dangerous chemical. But a marked decline in the number of goldfish found by the beach has led to the removal of the warning signs.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the removal of the signs?

A. Goldfish found off Rotunda Beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid. => Reverse answer

B. The amount of prestic acid produced by an individual goldfish has a direct positive correlation with the density of the goldfish population in that goldfish’s immediate vicinity.
=> out of scope. We need about prestic acid of GF
C. Goldfish consume various parasites that often contain prestic acid.
=> Irrelevant
D. Rotunda Beach is notoriously polluted.
=> Irrelevant
E. Goldfish would not be able to inhabit the waters off Rotunda Beach if those waters were not saturated with a precise mixture of acids, including prestic acid
=> The most correct answer. Because GF cannot inhabit in the water off RB where certain mixture of acid restrain GF's population. Caution sign should be removed for people to fish the hermit crab

_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1162
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: #Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2015, 10:57
After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach pier got sick from consuming locally fished hermit crabs,

the Rotunda Beach city authorities posted signs cautioning against the consumption of the crabs.

Tests revealed that the crabs were high in prestic acid, a dangerous chemical.

But a marked decline in the number of goldfish found by the beach has led to the removal of the warning signs.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the removal of the signs?

A. Goldfish found off Rotunda Beach cause hermit crabs to excrete prestic acid.
(If Goldfish causes crabs to excrete acid then their present should reduce prestic acid and cause removal of warning signs.
but instead their absence seemingly resulted in the same. This further exacerbates the paradox adding more confusion.)


B. The amount of prestic acid produced by an individual goldfish has a direct positive correlation with the density of the goldfish population in that goldfish’s immediate vicinity.
(if goldfish population amount of prestic acid
then decline in gold population indicates decline in the amount of prestic acid.
that is the reason why warning signs against eating crabs is removed since the amount of prestic acid reduce considerably.
This explains the paradox)

C. Goldfish consume various parasites that often contain prestic acid.
this does not explain why it is acceptable to eat crabs now.

D. Rotunda Beach is notoriously polluted.
This does not provide any useful information.

E. Goldfish would not be able to live in the waters off Rotunda Beach if those waters were not saturated with a precise mixture of acids, including prestic acid
(This is a double negative.
This means that If those waters are saturated with mixture of acids including prestic acid then Gold fish can live in waters off Beach.
so if Gold fish is decreasing then those mixture of acids is decreasing in content.
but
mixture of acids is not the same as prestic acid as it is possible that the mixture of acids may not be as harmful as prestic acd.
since we don't have info whether mixture is as harmful or harmless compared to prestic acid, we cannot infer any info which relates this info to do with crabs infection and removal of warnings.)

_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 21
Re: #Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2017, 19:45
I think the confusion here is with the line "But a marked decline in the number of goldfish found by the beach has led to the removal of the warning signs." of the question.
What does "by the beach" stands for. Is it "near the beach in the water" or is it "lying dead in and around the beach".
The understanding of this will greatly impact the solution.
Re: #Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach &nbs [#permalink] 13 Dec 2017, 19:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

#Top150 CR: After a number of migrant fishermen at the Rotunda Beach

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.