Hello Mahima1203
I have attempted this question and I have no issue saying that the question is totally garbage. There is no reason to practice such a question otherwise you will lose even your existing CR strategies. There is no logic in any of the answer choices of the question.
Read the stimulusMany non-profit companies pay their employees a wage significantly lower than the wage earned by employees doing comparable work in the for profit sector. A director of a non-profit company argued that the pay scale was justified because working at a non-profit company provides employees with valuable workplace experience.According to the director the for-profit companies did not provide employees with valuable workplace experience while non-profit companies do.
Two things can weaken the director's explanation:
1. An answer choice that proves that the for-profit companies also provide employees with valuable workplace experience.
2. An answer choice that proves that the director is mistaken and is in the wrong lead in his/her explanation and that the non-profit companies
did not provides employees with valuable workplace experience.
No answer choice is saying anything stated above hence there is no answer here. A good question could have been written based on this argument but the faulty answer choices spoil everything.
I hope that helps.
Mahima1203
Sajjad1994
Mahima1203
How is C weakening the argument? Please help!
Please read the OE in post below in the link.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/many-non-pro ... l#p1828569Good Luck!Yes, I read it. It says - "Choice C weakens the argument by showing that most employees already have experience, so the pay scale is not justified." They got experience by working in the non-profit company right? So, that means that non-profit company was helpful for them to get experience. Then how is it weakening? Could you please elaborate?