GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Aug 2018, 16:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5121
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2017, 14:25
21
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (01:18) correct 39% (01:43) wrong based on 882 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 150: Sentence Correction

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.

(A) the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

(B) the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

(C) that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to

(D) in the northeastern United States, sandpipers' vanishing due to residential and industrial development and to changes in

(E) in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers' vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

_________________
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1905
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2017, 14:27
6
3
The GMAT usually doesn't get poetic like this, and it’s one of the very few metaphors I’ve ever seen on official SC questions. Like any other GMAT SC question that uses “like”, we need two nouns that are logically comparable – and the tricky part here is deciding which of the metaphorical comparisons is actually “logically comparable.”

We covered some similar issues in our YouTube webinar on comparisons, so head on over there if you prefer your explanations in video form.

Quote:
(A) the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

The comparison here is shaky, but I’m not 100% sure that it’s absolutely wrong. Is there any reason why we can’t compare “the grassy field and old pastures” with “the sandpipers”, since both are vanishing? I guess not. So we can tolerate the comparison, even though there are better versions below.

The bigger problem: “the sandpipers vanishing… is a result…” The sandpipers (plural!) are the subject; vanishing is just an adjective. So the subject-verb agreement is wrong here. (If you think this “sounds OK”, you’re not wrong. The subject-verb agreement would be OK if “sandpipers” was possessive, because then “vanishing” would be the subject. But that’s not what’s actually happening here.)

So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

Not bad, the comparison is clarified somewhat by the use of “the bird itself”: that phrase is nicely comparable to “the grassy fields and old pastures”, since both are disappearing.

The parallelism also works well later in the sentence: “the bird itself is vanishing… as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in….” That’s great: the bird is vanishing as a result of X and of Y. Keep (B).

Quote:
(C) that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to

This isn’t a total disaster, but it’s not great, either. “Like the grassy fields and old pastures…, that the birds themselves are vanishing... is due to… development and changes…” In this particular use of “that”, the word basically means “the fact that.” So we’re literally comparing “the grassy fields and old pastures” to “the fact that the birds are vanishing.”

That doesn’t make any sense at all: we could compare the fields and pastures to the birds, and then say that all three of those things are vanishing. But we can’t compare the fields and pastures to the fact that the birds are vanishing.

So we can eliminate (C), too.

Quote:
(D) in the northeastern United States, sandpipers' vanishing due to residential and industrial development and to changes in

A lot of this is pretty clunky, but the real problem is that the grassy fields and old pastures are compared to “sandpipers’ vanishing.” And that doesn’t make sense: we’re literally comparing fields and pastures to “vanishing” – and not to the sandpipers themselves.

Plus, (D) doesn’t actually have an independent clause, which means that it isn’t a proper sentence. So (D) is gone.

Quote:
(E) in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers' vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

(E) has exactly the same issues as (D): the comparison is nonsense, and the sentence isn’t actually a real sentence, since it lacks an independent clause. So (B) is the best we can do.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 37
Location: Viet Nam
WE: General Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2017, 21:31
1
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.

A out because : (1) S-V agreement, "the sandpipers" is plural then usage of verb "is" is wrong; (2) meaning: "the sandpipers" cannot be "result of..." since vanishing aren't acting like a gerund.
C, D and E out because of wrong grammatical construction.

Hence B correct.

(A) the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

(B) the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in - Correct

(C) that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to

(D) in the northeastern United States, sandpipers' vanishing due to residential and industrial development and to changes in

(E) in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers' vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

_________________

+1 kudos if you find my posts helpful

Manager
Status: Aiming MBA!!
Joined: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 137
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.75
WE: Web Development (Consulting)
QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2017, 23:56
Quote:
The GMAT usually doesn't get poetic like this, and it’s one of the very few metaphors I’ve ever seen on official SC questions. Like any other GMAT SC question that uses “like”, we need two nouns that are logically comparable – and the tricky part here is deciding which of the metaphorical comparisons is actually “logically comparable.”

We covered some similar issues in our YouTube webinar on comparisons, so head on over there if you prefer your explanations in video form.

Quote:
(A) the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

The comparison here is shaky, but I’m not 100% sure that it’s absolutely wrong. Is there any reason why we can’t compare “the grassy field and old pastures” with “the sandpipers”, since both are vanishing? I guess not. So we can tolerate the comparison, even though there are better versions below.

The bigger problem: “the sandpipers vanishing… is a result…” The sandpipers (plural!) are the subject; vanishing is just an adjective. So the subject-verb agreement is wrong here. (If you think this “sounds OK”, you’re not wrong. The subject-verb agreement would be OK if “sandpipers” was possessive, because then “vanishing” would be the subject. But that’s not what’s actually happening here.)

So (A) is out.

Hi GMATNinja,

Wonderful Explanation for such a great official question!

But, I have one question regarding one of the points in your explanation for A. As per my understanding, even if the Subject Verb agreement was correct in option A, that is,

the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States are a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
Then also, this option would be incorrect as the meaning then implied is Non-sensical. It says that the sandpipers themselves are the result of residential and industrial development.

Can you please review and let me know if I am thinking correctly.

Thanks.
-Varun
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 48
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2017, 07:30
IMO B

A -- SV disagreement
C-- Comparison issue
D & E -- sentence structure issue
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 530
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2017, 05:54
GMATNinja wrote:
The GMAT usually doesn't get poetic like this, and it’s one of the very few metaphors I’ve ever seen on official SC questions. Like any other GMAT SC question that uses “like”, we need two nouns that are logically comparable – and the tricky part here is deciding which of the metaphorical comparisons is actually “logically comparable.”

We covered some similar issues in our YouTube webinar on comparisons, so head on over there if you prefer your explanations in video form.

Quote:
(A) the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

The comparison here is shaky, but I’m not 100% sure that it’s absolutely wrong. Is there any reason why we can’t compare “the grassy field and old pastures” with “the sandpipers”, since both are vanishing? I guess not. So we can tolerate the comparison, even though there are better versions below.

The bigger problem: “the sandpipers vanishing… is a result…” The sandpipers (plural!) are the subject; vanishing is just an adjective. So the subject-verb agreement is wrong here. (If you think this “sounds OK”, you’re not wrong. The subject-verb agreement would be OK if “sandpipers” was possessive, because then “vanishing” would be the subject. But that’s not what’s actually happening here.)

So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

Not bad, the comparison is clarified somewhat by the use of “the bird itself”: that phrase is nicely comparable to “the grassy fields and old pastures”, since both are disappearing.

The parallelism also works well later in the sentence: “the bird itself is vanishing… as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in….” That’s great: the bird is vanishing as a result of X and of Y. Keep (B).

Quote:
(C) that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to

This isn’t a total disaster, but it’s not great, either. “Like the grassy fields and old pastures…, that the birds themselves are vanishing... is due to… development and changes…” In this particular use of “that”, the word basically means “the fact that.” So we’re literally comparing “the grassy fields and old pastures” to “the fact that the birds are vanishing.”

That doesn’t make any sense at all: we could compare the fields and pastures to the birds, and then say that all three of those things are vanishing. But we can’t compare the fields and pastures to the fact that the birds are vanishing.

So we can eliminate (C), too.

Quote:
(D) in the northeastern United States, sandpipers' vanishing due to residential and industrial development and to changes in

A lot of this is pretty clunky, but the real problem is that the grassy fields and old pastures are compared to “sandpipers’ vanishing.” And that doesn’t make sense: we’re literally comparing fields and pastures to “vanishing” – and not to the sandpipers themselves.

Plus, (D) doesn’t actually have an independent clause, which means that it isn’t a proper sentence. So (D) is gone.

Quote:
(E) in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers' vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

(E) has exactly the same issues as (D): the comparison is nonsense, and the sentence isn’t actually a real sentence, since it lacks an independent clause. So (B) is the best we can do.

Thanks for the explanation
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 13
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V25
QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2017, 07:57
I don't get it! Why can't "vanishing" act as gerund here and make -through the use of "is"- SV thus correct?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1905
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2017, 21:32
1
drexxie wrote:
I don't get it! Why can't "vanishing" act as gerund here and make -through the use of "is"- SV thus correct?

In (D), "vanishing" does act as a gerund, so the subject-verb agreement is fine -- but the comparison doesn't make sense, as described here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/qotd-like-th ... l#p1956891

In (A), the construction is a little bit different: "Like the grassy fields and old pastures...., the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of..." I suppose you could argue that "vanishing" is the subject, but then what is "sandpipers" doing there? For "vanishing" to become the subject, "sandpipers" would need to be possessive, and that would require an apostrophe. And even if "vanishing" is the subject in (A), the comparison doesn't make sense: we're not comparing the grassy fields and old pastures to the act of vanishing.

I hope this helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 13
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V25
QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2017, 09:42
GMATNinja wrote:
drexxie wrote:
I don't get it! Why can't "vanishing" act as gerund here and make -through the use of "is"- SV thus correct?

In (D), "vanishing" does act as a gerund, so the subject-verb agreement is fine -- but the comparison doesn't make sense, as described here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/qotd-like-th ... l#p1956891

In (A), the construction is a little bit different: "Like the grassy fields and old pastures...., the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of..." I suppose you could argue that "vanishing" is the subject, but then what is "sandpipers" doing there? For "vanishing" to become the subject, "sandpipers" would need to be possessive, and that would require an apostrophe. And even if "vanishing" is the subject in (A), the comparison doesn't make sense: we're not comparing the grassy fields and old pastures to the act of vanishing.

I hope this helps!

Thanks! Now it's clear to me!
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 112
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.34
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2018, 23:45
GMATNinja
Can we eliminate (C) and (D) relatively quick on the basis of "due to"?
I learned that "due to" is followed by a subject/a noun and cannot be followed by a clause.
Manager
Joined: 01 May 2016
Posts: 83
Location: United States
GPA: 3.8
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2018, 06:43
We generally compare only apples with apples and oranges with oranges in comparison. So how can grassy fields and old pastures {which are related to grass) can be compared with the bird?
_________________

TD

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1905
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2018, 14:02
1
lary301254M7 wrote:
GMATNinja
Can we eliminate (C) and (D) relatively quick on the basis of "due to"?
I learned that "due to" is followed by a subject/a noun and cannot be followed by a clause.

The important thing to know about "due to" is that the phrase "due to ________" must modify a noun, and not a verb or verb phrase. It's a little bit rough around the edges, but there's a lengthy Q&A session about "due to" in this post: https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-chat- ... l#p1883212. Check that out, and see if it answers your question?

Tridhipal wrote:
We generally compare only apples with apples and oranges with oranges in comparison. So how can grassy fields and old pastures {which are related to grass) can be compared with the bird?

This is a rare case in which the comparison is somewhat metaphorical, and that can be perfectly acceptable. Check out the full explanation here, especially the part under answer choice (B).

I hope this helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Re: QOTD: Like the grassy fields and old pastures &nbs [#permalink] 10 May 2018, 14:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.