Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 00:52 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 00:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
JohnWycliffe
Joined: 03 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
20
 []
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 20
 []
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 367
Own Kudos:
2,622
 []
Given Kudos: 140
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 367
Kudos: 2,622
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Rocknrolla21
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 13 Aug 2021
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 227
Schools: NUS '23
Schools: NUS '23
Posts: 41
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnWycliffe, that's a brilliant score. Can you please share how you structured your preparation time, how many hours did you devote on an average per week?

Also, how many months did you spend preparing?

Thanks!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 39,369
Own Kudos:
76,735
 []
Given Kudos: 21,582
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,369
Kudos: 76,735
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Congrats and a great debrief. I probably would have written a very similar heading :-)
Still 99th percentile and I doubt it will keep you out of any program. Don't see how a 770 would make any difference, so would not think twice about it.


P.S. About why E is not the best answer, it is because of this: shows of all networks combined. GMAC cherishes scope and this is a great example of a harder question that makes the difference between right/wrong only with scope. We are not talking about all shows/all networks, only this one. It is a giveaway when something is out of scope. It is not logical but it is something one has to learn to get a high verbal score (GMAT quirks).
User avatar
LoneSurvivor
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 308
Kudos: 723
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnWycliffe

Pardon me, I am not a V45/47 Material but I would like to Discuss the Official CR Question you discussed,

Major Problem I see with E is , It states that although the projected profit will decrease because of increased Production Cost, Overall profit will still be greater than all the networks combined . But the Whole stimulus is Centred around Vidnet's Profit. E says although The overall profit will be greater than the other network profits combined but still its own profit which is Vidnet's profit will be less so E does not weaken the Argument.

On the other hand B weakens it somehow because If we replace the popular show with a ordinary show we may not be able to compensate the loss.

So I believe B is the correct answer.
User avatar
gmat1393
User avatar
Share GMAT Experience Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 647
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 647
Kudos: 2,374
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Congratulations JohnWycliffe on 760!!
Very good debrief

All the best for your apps
avatar
JohnWycliffe
Joined: 03 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LoneSurvivor
JohnWycliffe

Pardon me, I am not a V45/47 Material but I would like to Discuss the Official CR Question you discussed,

Major Problem I see with E is , It states that although the projected profit will decrease because of increased Production Cost, Overall profit will still be greater than all the networks combined . But the Whole stimulus is Centred around Vidnet's Profit. E says although The overall profit will be greater than the other network profits combined but still its own profit which is Vidnet's profit will be less so E does not weaken the Argument.

On the other hand B weakens it somehow because If we replace the popular show with a ordinary show we may not be able to compensate the loss.

So I believe B is the correct answer.

Yes, if E is true, Vidnets profits would decrease if it replaces Starlight with an average program with average popularity and production costs. Average popularity and production costs means average popularity and production costs across all networks.

Why? Because Starlight is more profitable than an average program with average popularity and production costs. It might not be more profitable than the average Vidnet program, but that's not what the argument proposes Vidnet be replaced by. Replacing a more profitable program with a less profitable program means Vidnet's profits will go down.
avatar
JohnWycliffe
Joined: 03 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
Congrats and a great debrief. I probably would have written a very similar heading :-)
Still 99th percentile and I doubt it will keep you out of any program. Don't see how a 770 would make any difference, so would not think twice about it.


P.S. About why E is not the best answer, it is because of this: shows of all networks combined. GMAC cherishes scope and this is a great example of a harder question that makes the difference between right/wrong only with scope. We are not talking about all shows/all networks, only this one. It is a giveaway when something is out of scope. It is not logical but it is something one has to learn to get a high verbal score (GMAT quirks).

We are talking about all networks. That's what the conclusion talks about when it suggests that Starlight be replaced with a show of average popularity and production costs. Average of what? Without specifying that Starlight be replaced by a show of what would be considered average popularity and production costs for Vidnet, the sentence by itself must be interpreted to talk about average popularity and production costs referenced vis a vis all television shows. That's what a show of average popularity is.

And E says, even if Starlight is less profitable than your average Vidnet show, it's still more profitable than your average show. Replacing it with the average show would make you less profitable.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 39,369
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21,582
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,369
Kudos: 76,735
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am sorry for diverting attention from the debrief :shh: Mia Culpa.

That should be the main point and in now way I was trying to say anything else, just was a bit overzealous and overhelpful :cool:
User avatar
freedom128
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Last visit: 01 Oct 2020
Posts: 943
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 402
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 943
Kudos: 1,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This story is compelling. CONGRATULATION for being a 99th percentile scorer. Which b-schools will you apply, sir?

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
JohnWycliffe
Joined: 03 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
20
 []
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 20
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChiranjeevSingh
Congratulations on the excellent score! :)

And wow for proving an official question wrong!! Can you share other official questions in which you have found the logic dicey or wrong? That'd be very helpful.

Also, if you have any other interesting observations from official questions, I'd be grateful if you can share them.

- CJ

Take this one:

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Quote:
Most bicycle helmets provide good protection for the top and back of the head, but little or no protection for the temple regions on the sides of the head. A study of head injuries resulting from bicycle accidents showed that a large proportion were caused by blows to the temple area. Therefore, if bicycle helmets protected this area, the risk of serious head injury in bicycle accidents would be greatly reduced, especially since ________.

(A) among the bicyclists included in the study's sample of head injuries, only a very small proportion had been wearing a helmet at the time of their accident

(B) even those bicyclists who regularly wear helmets have a poor understanding of the degree and kind of protection that helmets afford

(C) a helmet that included protection for the temples would have to be somewhat larger and heavier than current helmets

(D) the bone in the temple area is relatively thin and impacts in that area are thus very likely to cause brain injury

(E) bicyclists generally land on their arm or shoulder when they fall to the side, which reduces the likelihood of severe impacts on the side of the head

According to GMAT, the correct answer is D. It reasons that since the temple area is especially vulnerable, wearing bicycle helmets would greatly reduce injury there.

But it's harder to protect highly vulnerable areas. If the bones are in the temple area are espeically thin, then helmets might not be able greatly reduce the risk of head injury. A helmet might not be much help at all.

Rather if you land on your arm and dissipate some of the impact of the fall, as E suggests, helmets would be more useful in reducing your risk of serious head injury. Where the risk might have been 15% if you just land on your arm, it may be 0.1% if you wear a helmet and land on your arm, a nearly 100% decrease in risk.

If the force of the blow is decreased, armor would be more useful. Armor is more useful in protecting against low speed projectiles than high speed projectiles. Armor would be able to better protect the less vulnerable parts of your body than the more vulnerable parts of your body.
User avatar
ari.banerjee
Joined: 31 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Oct 2020
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 174
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V24
GMAT 2: 540 Q31 V34
GMAT 3: 590 Q36 V34
GMAT 4: 600 Q42 V30
GRE 1: Q159 V152
GPA: 4
GMAT 4: 600 Q42 V30
GRE 1: Q159 V152
Posts: 132
Kudos: 136
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnWycliffe
ChiranjeevSingh
Congratulations on the excellent score! :)

And wow for proving an official question wrong!! Can you share other official questions in which you have found the logic dicey or wrong? That'd be very helpful.

Also, if you have any other interesting observations from official questions, I'd be grateful if you can share them.

- CJ

Take this one:

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Quote:
Most bicycle helmets provide good protection for the top and back of the head, but little or no protection for the temple regions on the sides of the head. A study of head injuries resulting from bicycle accidents showed that a large proportion were caused by blows to the temple area. Therefore, if bicycle helmets protected this area, the risk of serious head injury in bicycle accidents would be greatly reduced, especially since ________.

(A) among the bicyclists included in the study's sample of head injuries, only a very small proportion had been wearing a helmet at the time of their accident

(B) even those bicyclists who regularly wear helmets have a poor understanding of the degree and kind of protection that helmets afford

(C) a helmet that included protection for the temples would have to be somewhat larger and heavier than current helmets

(D) the bone in the temple area is relatively thin and impacts in that area are thus very likely to cause brain injury

(E) bicyclists generally land on their arm or shoulder when they fall to the side, which reduces the likelihood of severe impacts on the side of the head

According to GMAT, the correct answer is D. It reasons that since the temple area is especially vulnerable, wearing bicycle helmets would greatly reduce injury there.

But it's harder to protect highly vulnerable areas. If the bones are in the temple area are espeically thin, then helmets might not be able greatly reduce the risk of head injury. A helmet might not be much help at all.

Rather if you land on your arm and dissipate some of the impact of the fall, as E suggests, helmets would be more useful in reducing your risk of serious head injury. Where the risk might have been 15% if you just land on your arm, it may be 0.1% if you wear a helmet and land on your arm, a nearly 100% decrease in risk.

If the force of the blow is decreased, armor would be more useful. Armor is more useful in protecting against low speed projectiles than high speed projectiles. Armor would be able to better protect the less vulnerable parts of your body than the more vulnerable parts of your body.

Hi,

Congratulations on a great score. I consider myself slow as well so I am happy to see someone from my community do well haha

However, in the second example I think that you are missing the point. The question falls under what most logically completes the argument. The author is advocating for the use of helmets that protect the temple area. So logically an answer choice that adds to that theory would be correct. How does someone falling on their arm add to the remedy to the problem that the author is proposing? If the Bicyclists already land on their sides and arm then there is no need to wear protective head gear that will save them in case they fall. I think option E doesn't continue along the thought process of the Author.

Good luck on the applications! Have you decided on the schools yet?
avatar
JohnWycliffe
Joined: 03 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ari.banerjee
JohnWycliffe
ChiranjeevSingh
Congratulations on the excellent score! :)

And wow for proving an official question wrong!! Can you share other official questions in which you have found the logic dicey or wrong? That'd be very helpful.

Also, if you have any other interesting observations from official questions, I'd be grateful if you can share them.

- CJ

Take this one:

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Quote:
Most bicycle helmets provide good protection for the top and back of the head, but little or no protection for the temple regions on the sides of the head. A study of head injuries resulting from bicycle accidents showed that a large proportion were caused by blows to the temple area. Therefore, if bicycle helmets protected this area, the risk of serious head injury in bicycle accidents would be greatly reduced, especially since ________.

(A) among the bicyclists included in the study's sample of head injuries, only a very small proportion had been wearing a helmet at the time of their accident

(B) even those bicyclists who regularly wear helmets have a poor understanding of the degree and kind of protection that helmets afford

(C) a helmet that included protection for the temples would have to be somewhat larger and heavier than current helmets

(D) the bone in the temple area is relatively thin and impacts in that area are thus very likely to cause brain injury

(E) bicyclists generally land on their arm or shoulder when they fall to the side, which reduces the likelihood of severe impacts on the side of the head

According to GMAT, the correct answer is D. It reasons that since the temple area is especially vulnerable, wearing bicycle helmets would greatly reduce injury there.

But it's harder to protect highly vulnerable areas. If the bones are in the temple area are espeically thin, then helmets might not be able greatly reduce the risk of head injury. A helmet might not be much help at all.

Rather if you land on your arm and dissipate some of the impact of the fall, as E suggests, helmets would be more useful in reducing your risk of serious head injury. Where the risk might have been 15% if you just land on your arm, it may be 0.1% if you wear a helmet and land on your arm, a nearly 100% decrease in risk.

If the force of the blow is decreased, armor would be more useful. Armor is more useful in protecting against low speed projectiles than high speed projectiles. Armor would be able to better protect the less vulnerable parts of your body than the more vulnerable parts of your body.

Hi,

Congratulations on a great score. I consider myself slow as well so I am happy to see someone from my community do well haha

However, in the second example I think that you are missing the point. The question falls under what most logically completes the argument. The author is advocating for the use of helmets that protect the temple area. So logically an answer choice that adds to that theory would be correct. How does someone falling on their arm add to the remedy to the problem that the author is proposing? If the Bicyclists already land on their sides and arm then there is no need to wear protective head gear that will save them in case they fall. I think option E doesn't continue along the thought process of the Author.

Good luck on the applications! Have you decided on the schools yet?

Thank you for the congratulations. I think I might apply for the Master of Finance programs at MIT, Princeton, LSE, Columbia, and HEC and some places that might be willing to give me a full ride.

"Following the thought process of the author" may be the common sense approach, but I don't think it's the logical one. Saying that something will greatly reduce your risk of getting hurt especially because you are at more risk of getting hurt doesn't make sense to me. Air bags, helmets, and the like would be better able to protect you if you were less fragile, and they would be less able to protect you if you were more fragile.

Falling on your arm doesn't mean you don't hit your head. You can still hurt yourself. Reducing the impact on your head though makes it more likely for the helmet to absorb all the impact on your head.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
kavach
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2021
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 687
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.6
WE:Marketing (Hospitality and Tourism)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is great. Congrats man! It will be great if you could share how many hours did you devote per day for your prep.
User avatar
Hovkial
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 203
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 805
Kudos: 2,088
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnWycliffe

Great debrief. I especially appreciated the honesty and the detailing of the actual real world situation of the testtaker. Many would have us believe in a linear storyline where fantastic test prep materials helped them to touch the skies. We tend to ignore those who didn't fare as well, but are equally talented and worked off their behinds.

There are plenty of slow pokes and dim-witted folks out there who are brilliant thinkers, writers, teachers, academics, etc. etc.

As to the GMAT questions. They are of a special type and adhere to GMAT logic - not philosophical logic or mathematical logic or something else. In the examples you cited, the GMAT answers are correct as long as we take for given that we must use "GMAT logic". For example, this means that answers that make broad generalizations outside of the question are incorrect even though they may be argued to be correct from broader logical frameworks.

There is nothing overtly wrong with this GMAT logic. The exam is designed to test GMAT logical aptitude. And to do well on an aptitude test, one must understand the parameters of the test.

Clearly, you mastered this special form of logic. Your points though are interesting and deserve some contemplation. Cheers.

P.S. The points about GMAT logic also apply to the LSAT/GRE/TOEFL tests as well.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
2,011
 []
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,011
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnWycliffe

Congratulations for that great score...!!

Reading your debrief injected a new ray of hope for a slow pacer like me. Though there is not much about how you prepared but i can understand how difficult it is to read comprehend and then answer only to find the logic i applied is not correct.

Diverting from the topic, talking about the Vidnet-Starlight questions i was almost sure after reading it first time that i would have marked E under timed condition since it is constructed in that fashion. But reading till the point when 'all networks' just bumps from nowhere and it just crash lands you.

Quote:
The more viewers a television show attracts, the greater the advertising revenue the show generates. The television network Vidnet's most popular show, Starlight, currently earns the network's highest profits, but next year, because of unavoidable increases in production costs, its profits are projected to fall to below the average for Vidnet shows. Therefore, Vidnet would earn greater profits overall if it replaced Starlight with a show of average popularity and production costs.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The average profits of Vidnet shows have increased in each of the last three years.

B. Shows that occupy time slots immediately before and after very popular shows tend to have far more viewers that they otherwise would.

C. Starlight currently has the highest production costs of all Vidnet shows.

D. Last year Vidnet lost money on a weekly show that was substantially similar to Starlight and was broadcast on a different day from Starlight.

E. Even if, as a result of increased production costs, Starlight becomes less profitable than the average for Vidnet shows, it will still be more profitable than the average for television shows of all networks combined.

One thing i have noticed in all GMAT questions is that not only the logic (in CR particularly) is real world inspired that bounces right over your head(in cricketing terms - Ya i come from India with Hockey as its national game :tongue_opt2) but vocabulary is fiery also. All the answer choices are like galaxies each shining brightly and wrong answer - most brightly. A wrong galaxy would have a black hole and right one would lack one which we need to find(consider such a way of presenting my point as an aftereffect of dong GMAT RCs :) ).

So E is wrong since its scope covers all networks but for it to be right new assumptions are required to be made. On one instance i even thought of C being right but you know again i have to make an assumptions so it's wrong. Had it not been POE i would not have marked B as correct since i had hard time after reading it to justify it correct with similar reasoning you gave - not to mention that i had to make assumptions to convince myself(can't deny that still i don't have apprehensions :? ).

I have been reading that GMAT is all about logic and comprehension but consider the questions on mixtures specially Milk and Water. Just show the question to people from countryside and see the reaction on their faces - i mean who would pay for a 50% concentrated milk OR who's driving speed is constant in cities(traffic seems to be afraid of GMAT questions as well). Ya i comprehended the question well but can't digest the logic. But i guess i am going into a delusional :roll: world since it's only a GMAT question not the real world and for that matter i have to remain within the boundaries of urban landscape. Hahaha..!

I want to explain the reasoning i have for the bicycle-helmet question but now you can very guess what i would write. Right...!!!

BTW if you find bad English and logic in my writing do factor in that i am on my way to write GMAT still to conquer all the fronts of GMAT world.
avatar
omavsp
Joined: 20 Aug 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 193
Products:
Posts: 37
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amazing score! I hope that you get accepted to the school you desire.

Regarding the CR:

In my opinion, E doesn’t necessarily tell you that Var. will earn greater profits. In case its av. is greater than others, E means it wont.
For example:
Say starlight earns 12k, Var.’s average is 8k and and other network’s average is 6k. E tells you that starlight will be more profitable than 6k, and Var. lost 2k - which it can potentially earn from Var. average show (8k).

B tells you that other shows will suffer a decline if starlight is replaced with an Average (8k) Var. show.

It took me two good reads to understand it. It is definitely a hard one.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
JohnWycliffe
Joined: 03 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
20
 []
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 20
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
omavsp
Amazing score! I hope that you get accepted to the school you desire.

Regarding the CR:

In my opinion, E doesn’t necessarily tell you that Var. will earn greater profits. In case its av. is greater than others, E means it wont.
For example:
Say starlight earns 12k, Var.’s average is 8k and and other network’s average is 6k. E tells you that starlight will be more profitable than 6k, and Var. lost 2k - which it can potentially earn from Var. average show (8k).

B tells you that other shows will suffer a decline if starlight is replaced with an Average (8k) Var. show.

It took me two good reads to understand it. It is definitely a hard one.

Posted from my mobile device

Reading comments like this that address the Vidnet problem but don't address what I say about that problem is mildly frustrating with respect to my faith in humanity. I address these points in the OP and in subsequent posts. I don't really want to harp on this because its not the main point of the post so this will be the last time I am not able to resist:

In my view, the most accurate way to read the problem based on the way it is worded is:

X is the most popular show on Vidnet. But next year it will be less profitable than Y. Therefore, Vidnet would be more profitable if it replaced X with Z.

Which of the following most weakens the argument:

Option E. Even though X is less profitable than Y, X is more profitable than Z.
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 367
Own Kudos:
2,622
 []
Given Kudos: 140
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 367
Kudos: 2,622
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys, here's my attempt to explain what John has been trying to say.

Let's consider the below argument:

Joe is currently the highest scorer in ABC school. However, because of unfortunate circumstances, he is going to score next year below the average score for the students in ABC school. Therefore, ABC school can raise its average score by replacing Joe with a person who gets an average score.

My question here is: Is there any difference between the following two statements?
1. The ABC school can raise its overall average score by replacing Joe with a person who gets an average score.
2. The ABC school can raise its overall average score by replacing Joe with a person who gets a score that is average for the ABC school.

If you think there is a difference, you've understood the difference John was trying to highlight. When we just say 'average' without specifying 'average for the school or average for the city', we automatically mean 'average for all'. For example: If say X is the fastest runner, don't I mean that X is the fastest runner in the world? If I want to be specific, I should say that X is the fastest runner in the city or in the country. Without any such modifier 'X is the fastest runner' means 'fastest among all'.

Similarly, since the conclusion here says just 'average score' without specifying 'average for which category', it means 'average for all'. Thus, the conclusion suggests that we should replace Joe with a guy who gets an overall average score.

However, we just know that Joe is going to get less than the average for ABC school. He may still end up scoring higher than the 'overall average'. In such a case, it will not make any sense to replace Joe with a person who scores equal to the 'overall average'.

For this reason, option E in the original question weakens the argument and thus should be correct.

To make option E incorrect in the original argument, the conclusion needs to be altered to:

Therefore, Vidnet would earn greater profits overall if it replaced Starlight with a show of popularity and production costs average for Vidnet shows.

I hope it makes some sense.

- CJ
 1   2   
Moderator:
Founder
39369 posts